資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.116.45.207)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
職前生物教師科學態度的研究
書刊名:
師大學報
作者:
鄭湧涇
/
周雪美
出版日期:
1990
卷期:
35
頁次:
頁249-270
主題關鍵詞:
生物教師
;
科學態度
;
職前
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
8
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:31
本研究發展並效化「科學態度測驗」(SAT)用以探索我國中等學校職前生物教師之科學態度素養發展狀況。SAT的發展,是以經鑑別之「科學態度組成因素表」為命題之概念依據;初稿完成後,經修訂、試訂、再修訂後,進行施測和效化分析。 研究結果顯示,SAT「內部均質性信度」(以Cronbach α表示)為0.69,「穩定係數」為0.78。SAT分數與TOSA及BISI分數之間的相關分別為0.84和0.60,「同時效度」與「概念效度」的考驗結果均十分滿意。資料分析顯示SAT為一適切、可信、可靠的生物教師科學態度屬性的評鑑工具。 全體樣本SAT分數的平均數為31.71,標準差為4.36。四個年級樣本SAT分數之間的差易經變異數分析的結果,顯示並無顯著差異存在;而事後比較(Duncan方法)的結果則顯示,三年級樣本的SAT得分顯著高於一年級(P<0.05)
以文找文
In this study, the Scientific Attitude Test (SAT) was developed and validated. The con-struction of the items was based upon an identified list of scientific attitude components. The instrument was pilot-tried, revised, and finally validated through exploring the possession of scientific attitudes by the students of the biology teacher education program. The analysis of data indicated that the internal consistency reliability of the SAT scores was 0.69, a moderate value which is similar to those reported in the literature. The stability coefficient was 0.78. The correlations between SAT and TOSA and BISI scores were 0.84 and 0.60 respectively. Further data analysis provided relatively satisfactory support of the concur-rent and consturct validity of the SAT. The mean and the standard deviation of the SAT scores for the entire subjects were 31.71 and 4.36. There were no statistically significant differences in SAT scores among the four grade levels in the analysis of variance. However, it was found that the juniors scored signifi-cantly higher in SAT than the freshmen (p<0.05) when further comparisons between each pair of means were made.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Campbell, J. R.(1977)。Science teachers' flexibility。JRST,14(6),525-532。
2.
DeRose, J. V.、Lockard, J. D.、Paddy, L. G.(1979)。The teacher is the key: A report on three NSF studies。The Science Teacher,46(4),31-37。
3.
Kerr, Donna H.(1983)。Teaching Competence and Teacher Education in the United States。Teachers College Record,84(3),525-552。
4.
Mechling, Kenneth R.(1975)。The Preparation of Junior High Science Teachers: By Default or by Design?。School Science and Mathematics,75(5),395-398。
5.
Shymansky, James A.(1978)。Assessing Teacher Performance in the Classroom: Pattern Analysis Applied to Interaction Data。Studies in Educational Evaluation,4(2),99-106。
6.
Aiken, K. R. Jr.、Aiken, D. R.(1969)。Recent research on attitude concerning science。Science Education,58(4),295-305。
7.
Billeh, V. Y.、Zakhariades, G. A.(1975)。The development and application of a scale for measuring scientific attitude。Science Education,59(2),155-165。
8.
Kozlow, M. J.、Nay, M. A.(1976)。An approach to measuring scientific attitudes。Science Education,60(2),146-172。
9.
盧欽銘(19770200)。科學性向與科學態度的分析研究報告。科學教育,6,24-30。
延伸查詢
10.
Gauld, C. F.、Hukins, A. A.(1980)。Scientific attitudes A review。Studies in Science Education,7(1),129-161。
11.
Champagne, A. B.、Horning, L. E.(1987)。Issues of Science teacher quality, supply, and demand。Science Education,71(1),57-76。
12.
Diederich, P. B.(1967)。Components of the Scientific Attitude。The Science Teacher,34(2),23-24。
13.
高師物理系科教研究小組(19800400)。國中物理教師科學態度研究。科學教育,34,68-74。
延伸查詢
14.
Haney, R. E.(1964)。The development of scientific attitudes。The Science Teacher,31(12),33-35。
15.
鍾秀景(19790400)。我國中等學校學生科學態度評量之研究。教育學院學報,4,左325-350。
延伸查詢
16.
Shymansky, James A.、Penick, John、Good, Ronald G.、Matthews, Charles C.(1975)。Using macroanalytic techniques to study teacher behavior patterns。Journal of Research in Sdence Teaching,12(3),221-227。
17.
Kahle, Jane Butler、Yager, Robert E.(1981)。Current Indicators for the Discipline of Science Education。Science Education,65(1),25-31。
18.
Blank, R. K.(1988)。Improving research on teacher quality in science and math: Report of a symposium of scientists, educators, and researchers。JRST,25(3),217-224。
19.
Cronbach, L. J.、Meehl, P. E.(1955)。Construct validity in psychological test。Psychological Bulletin,52(4),281-302。
20.
Gauld, C. F.(1981)。The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal。Science Education,66(1),109-121。
21.
Heiss, E. D.(1958)。Helping students develop a scientific attitude。The Science Teacher,25,371-373。
22.
Mechling, K. R.、Stedman, C. H.、Donnellan, K. M.(1982)。Preparing and certifying science teachers: A NSTA report。Science & Children,20(2),5-14。
23.
Morris, V.(1972)。A minimum competency program for the preparation and support of innovative secondary school science teachers。Science Education,56(4),547-555。
24.
National Science Teacher Association(1984)。Recommended Standards for the Preparation and Certification of Secondary School Teachers of Science: A NSTA Position Statement。The Science Teacher,51(9),57-62。
25.
Penick, J. E.、Shymansky, J. A.、Matthews, C. C.、Good, R. G.(1976)。Studying the effects of two quantitative defined teaching strategies on student behavior in elementary school science using macroanalytic techniques。JRST,13(4),289-296。
26.
Gardner, P. L.(1975)。Attitudes to Science : A Review。Studies in Science Education,2(1),1-41。
27.
Campbell, Donald T.、Fiske, Donald W.(1959)。Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix。Psychological Bulletin,56(2),81-105。
28.
Cronbach, Lee J.(1951)。Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests。Psychometrika,16(3),297-334。
會議論文
1.
許榮富、趙金祁、吳永吉(1986)。國中學生科學態度成就分析。中華民國74年度科學教育學術研討會。國科會。185-219。
延伸查詢
2.
鄭湧涇、周美雪、張麗珠(1989)。職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。257-283。
延伸查詢
3.
鄭湧涇(1987)。生物教師必備教學能力研究。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。1-25。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
鄭湧涇(1988)。生物師資養成過程中,教學能力發展之研究(II):對科學的本質的了解和生物探討技能 (計畫編號:NSC76-0111-S003-31)。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
潘正安(1984)。國中學生科學態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
National Commission for Excellence in Teacher Education(1985)。A Call for Change in Teacher Education。Washingtion, D.C.:American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。
2.
Borg, W. R.、Gall, M. D.(1979)。Educational Research: An Introduction。New York:Longman。
3.
Isaac, S.、Michael, W. B.(1983)。Handbook in Research and Evaluation for Education and the Behavioral Science。San Diego. CA:Edits Publishers。
4.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education(1969)。Recommended Standards for Teacher Education: The Accreditation of Basic and Advanced Preparation Programs for Proffessional School Personnel。Washington, D.C.:AACTE。
5.
Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and education。NY:McGraw-Hill。
6.
National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education(1983)。Educating Americans for the 21st Century: A plan of action for improving math, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995。Washington, D.C.。
圖書論文
1.
Bethel, L. J.(1985)。Is there a shortage of science and math teachers? Are new teachers being prepared to enter the profession?。Research within reach : science education : a research-guided response to the concerns of educators。Washington, D.C.:NSTA。
2.
Lunetta, V. N.、Yager, R. E.(1983)。New directions in science teacher education。Preservice and Inservice Training of Science Teachers。Balaban Inter-national Science Services。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
高中生對機率學習的態度問卷之編製與研究
2.
國小學童「科學態度」及「對科學的態度」之研究--以植物的生長教學活動為例
3.
小學自然的科學態度之研究
4.
國中生物教師教學內容知識的詮釋性研究
5.
中等學校生物教師教學能力之研究
6.
職前與在職生物教師科學態度之研究
7.
職前與在職生物教師的生物教材有關能力研究
8.
職前生物教師的生物探討技能
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code