:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為什麼要上辯論課呢?
書刊名:英語教學
作者:何慧玲
出版日期:1993
卷期:18:2=70
頁次:頁16-27
主題關鍵詞:辯論課
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
期刊論文
1.Hample, D.(1988)。Argument: Public and private, social and cognitive。Journal of the American Forensic Association,25(1),13-19。  new window
2.Colbert, K. R.、Biggers, T.(1985)。Why should we support debate?。Journal of the American Forensic Association,21(4),237-240。  new window
3.Colbert, K. R.(1993)。The effects of debate participation on argumentativeness and verbal aggression。Communication Education,42(3),206-214。  new window
4.Huseman, R. C.、Goodman, D. M.(1976)。Editor's Comer: BYD congressional questionnaire。Journal of the American Association,12(4),226。  new window
5.Jensen, J. V.(1992)。Values and practices in Asian argumentation。Argumentation and Advocacy,28(4),153-166。  new window
6.Rancer, A. S.、Kosberg, R. L.、Baukus, R. A.(1992)。Beliefs about Arguing as predictors of Trait Argumentativeness: Implications for Training in Argument and Conflict Management。Communication Education,41(4),375-387。  new window
7.Garrett, M. M.(1993)。Classical Chinese conceptions of argumentation and persuasion。Argumentation and Advocacy,29(3),105-115。  new window
8.Pollock, A.(1982)。The relationship of a background in scholastic forensics to effective communication in the legislative assembly。Speaker and Gavel,19,17。  new window
9.Semlak, W. D.、Shields, D.(1977)。The effect of debate training on students participation in bicentennial youth debates。Journal of the American Forensic Association,13(4),194-196。  new window
圖書
1.(1960)。100 of 160 leaders began careers as student debaters。Freedom and Union。  new window
圖書論文
1.Infante, D. A.(1987)。Aggressiveness。Personality and Interpersonal Communication。Newbuiy Park, CA:Sage Publication。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE