資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.129.39.152)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
中美日在臺企業經營目標、組織結構及競爭策略之比較研究
書刊名:
臺大管理論叢
作者:
吳萬益
作者(外文):
Wu, Wann-yih
出版日期:
1994
卷期:
5:2
頁次:
頁83-114
主題關鍵詞:
競爭優勢
;
目標任務
;
組織結構
;
競爭策略
;
Competitive advantages
;
Missions objectives
;
Organizational structures
;
Competitive strategies
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:0
點閱:61
國際化與自由化為現代企業經營發展之重要趨勢,而近年來國際保護主義之盛行及地區性聯盟之成立均迫使企業前往海外投資,以減經關稅或非關稅障礙所帶來的壓力。然而,投資於國外之企業,面對不同之政經情勢,文化背景及法令限制時,其經營管理之模式必然與國內企業有所不同。國內企業之經營管理多半以學習美日兩國之經驗為主。因此,在國內企業邁向國際化的過程中,若能先行瞭解美日兩國在台企業在企業文化、管理風格、組織結構及經營績效等方面之特性,必能有所借鏡,進而使企業國際化成功之機率大為增加。 透過中美日企業經營者訪談及問卷調查,本研究之結論如下: 一、中美日企業在公司目標、組織結構、競爭策略與經營績效等構面因素上具有顯著之差異。 二、在公司目標方面,日本企業重視員工之培訓與組織之發展,美國企業重視短期之利潤目標。在組織結構方面,美國企業之授權及正式化程度遠較日本及台灣企業為高。在經替策略方面,美國企業普遍重視產品差異化及成本領導策略,日本企業與台灣企業較重視製程創新策略及產品發展策略。 三、採用製程創新及產品差異化策略之廠商較強調組織發展及成長兩目標,且重視所屬產業的發展潛力。採行成本領導策略的廠商則較重視成長目標,且其組織的正式化及標準化程度較高。
以文找文
Internationalization and liberalization of business activities have become two of the most significant phenomena for the successful operations of contemporary enterprises. Recently, the prevalence of national protectionism and the establishment of regional eco-nomic communities, have further enhanced many companies to engage in overseas in-vestments so that the tariff and non-tariff barriers of the products could be reduced or eliminated. Yet, firms operate in different countries with different political, legal, economic, and social cultural environments might have different management styles and strategic operating patterns. Traditionally, the Japanese and the U.S. management patterns are two of the most important reference models for the operations of domestic enterprises. Thus, to promote the success of business internationalization activities, it would be very helpful for the domestic firms in Taiwan to evaluate the similarities and differences of the characteristics of business operations for the U.S. and the Japanese firms, especially on management styles, organizational structures, competitive strategies, and business performances. Through a series of personal interview and mail survey, this study concluded the following findings: (1) Finns with different investment origins ( i.e., Taiwanese, American, and Japa-nese firms) tended to operate differently on constructs of corporate objectives, organiza-tional structures, competitive strategies, and management performances. (2) For corporate objectives, Japanese firms tended to emphasize organizational development objectives through educating and activating human resources, while Ameri-can firms favor financial objective such as improving cash flow and profitability. For organizational structures, American firms achieved higher levels of delegation authority and operation formalization than those of Japanese and Taiwanese firms. For compete-tive strategies, American firms tended to emphasize product differentiation and cost leadership strategies while Japanese firms favor process innovation and product differ-entiation strategies. (3) Firms selecting process innovation and product development strategies tended to emphasize both organizational development and sales growth objectives. These firms tended to be very sensitive on the potentials of industry development. In addition, firms adopting cost leadership strategies tended to emphasize sales growth objectives. These firms seemed to exercise higher levels of formalization and standardization of business activities.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Dalton, Dan R.(1980)。Organizational Structure and Performance: A Critical Review。Academy of Management Review,5(1),49-64。
2.
Dess, G. G.(1987)。Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry。Strategic Management Journal,8,259-277。
3.
Gates, Stephen R.、Egelhoff, William G.(1986)。Centralization in Headquarter-Subsidiary Relationship。Joumal of International Business Studies,1986(Summer),72-92。
4.
Kotabe, Masaaki、Omura, Glenn S.(1989)。Sourcing Strategies of European and Japanese Multinationals: A Comparison。Journal of International Business Studies,20,113-130。
5.
Kotabe, Masaaki、Omura, Glenn S.、Duhan, Dale F.(1991)。The Perceived Veracity of PIMS Strategy Principles in Japan: An Empirical Inquiry。Journal of Marketing,55,26-41。
6.
Miller, Danny(1987)。The Structureand Environmental Correlations of Business Strategy。Strategic Management Journal,8(1),55-77。
7.
Pearce, John A. II、Robbins, D. Keith、Robinson, Richard B. JR.(1987)。The Impact of Grand Strategy and Planning Formality on Financial Performance。Strategic Management Journal,8(1),125-134。
8.
McDaniel, Stephen W.、Kolari, James W.(19871000)。Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic Typology。Journal of Marketing,51(4),19-30。
9.
Miller, Danny、Friesen, Peter H.(1978)。Archetypes of Strategy Formulation。Management Science,24(9),921-933。
10.
Walker, Orville C. Jr.、Ruekert, Robert W.(1987)。Marketing's role in the implementation of business strategies: A critical review and conceptual framework。Journal of Marketing,51(3),15-33。
11.
Ghoshal, Sumantra、Nohria, Nitin(1989)。Internal Differentiation Within Multinational Corporations。Strategic Management Journal,10(4),323-337。
學位論文
1.
Wu, Wann-Yih(1991)。Competitive Strategies for Subsidiaries of Multinational Companies: A Comparative Study of American, Japanese, European, and Taiwanese Firms in Taiwan(博士論文)。Oklahoma State University。
2.
Yeh, Ryh-Song(1986)。Values and Intraorganizational Influence: A Comparative Study of Taiwanese, Japanese and American Firms in Taiwan(博士論文)。Temple University。
圖書
1.
林彩梅(1990)。多國籍企業論。五南出版社。
延伸查詢
2.
郭崑模(1990)。企業管理。三民書局。
延伸查詢
3.
曾仕強(1985)。中國的經營理念。聯經出版公司。
延伸查詢
4.
Chandler, A. D.(1962)。Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
5.
Day, George S.(1984)。Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantages。Minneapolis:West Publishing Co.。
6.
Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.(1992)。Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings。N. Y.:MacMillan Publishing Company。
7.
Kagono, Tadao、Nonaka, Ikujiro、Sakakibara, Kiyonori、Okumura, Akihiro(1989)。Strategic VS Evolutionary Management: A U. S.-Japanese Comparison of Strategy and Organization。New York:Elsevire Science Publishing Co.。
8.
McGregor, Douglas(1960)。The Human side of Enterprises。N. Y.:McGraw-Hill Books Company。
9.
Morse, John J.、Lorsch, Jay W.(1974)。Organizations and Their Members: A Contingency Approach。New York:Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.。
10.
Negandhi, A. R.、Prasad, S. B.(1971)。Comparative Management。New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts。
11.
Negandhi, A. R.、Prasad, S. B.、Welge, M.(1984)。Beyond Theory Z: Global Rationalization Strategies of American, German, and Japanese Multinational Companies。Greenwich, Conn:JAI Press, Inc.。
12.
Ohmae, Kenichi(1985)。Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition。New York:The Free Press。
13.
Wheelen, Thomas L.、Hunger, J. David(1986)。Strategic Management and Business Policy。MA:Addition-Wesley。
14.
Ouchi, W. G.(1981)。Theory Z: How American Business Can meet the Japanese Challenge。Addison-Wesley。
15.
Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。
16.
Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY:Free Press。
17.
Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。
18.
Miles, Raymond E.、Snow, Charles C.(1978)。Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process。McGraw-Hill。
其他
1.
邱毅(1993)。中國古代管理思想之今用。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
綜合零售業市場競爭策略之分析
2.
Competitive Strategies for International Research-Based Pharmaceutical Company
3.
組織結構、全面品質管理、ISO 9000與競爭優勢、組織績效之結構化模式分析
4.
金融控股公司競爭優勢策略群組與創意研發之研究
5.
國際企業之「策略性角色」、「組織結構」、「人力資源策略」與組織績效之關係--在臺子公司之實證
6.
Japanese Distrust in Local Subordinates: Is the Japanese Overseas Management System a Modified System?
7.
臺美日企業在臺灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究
8.
銀行業策略群組與新產品發展之研究
1.
企業競爭策略下獎酬制度設計之權變架構
2.
改制之技術學院和科技大學競爭策略建構之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code