:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣農業多因素生產力長期趨勢的探討
書刊名:農業經濟叢刊
作者:黃寶祚 引用關係
出版日期:1995
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁255-282
主題關鍵詞:臺灣農業多因素生產力
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:72
本文採用影子定價的原理來建立一個農業生產力長期趨勢的評估模型,所建構生產力基本模型包括兩固定投入一變動投入的函數內涵與考慮短期調整成本之觀念,並以本文所推計的農業投入(考慮其異質特性)與推計之農業產出(配合其未來規劃方向)等調整後資料進行生產力指數分析。經資料推計與實證測度之後顯示,四十餘年來我國農業多因素生產力大致為「先升後緩降」走勢,且歷年來產能利用率有下滑現象,由民國43年的87.81%,降至62年的85.36%,再降至78年的83.32%。此外,我國農業多因素生產力衰退階段在70年代尚不太明顯,明顯的衰退現象遲至其十年後的80年代初期方顯現出來,成為該產業生產力長期趨勢的特色之一。
The previous measures of multifactor productivity growth have been based on homogenous inputs, and have assumed all inputs are instantaneously adjustable, and thus ignore the important impacts of short-run fixity of certain primary inputs (not intermediate inputs). The main objective of this paper is to construct indexes of long-term agricultural multifactor productivity growth since 1952. The indexes take into account the adjustment of the observed productivity measures. Empirical results find that pervasive and chronic excess capacity exists in Taiwan's agricultural sector. In addition, it is found that the multifactor productivity growth decline slowly in the 1980's and more repidly in the 1990's.
期刊論文
1.Galeotti, M.(1990)。Specification of the technology for neoclassical investment theory: Testing the adjustment costs approach。The Review of Economics and Statistics,72(3),471-480。  new window
2.Luh, Y. H.、Stefanou, S. E.(1991)。Productivity growth in U.S. agriculture under dynamic adjustment。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73(4),1114-1125。  new window
3.黃寶祚、黃寶強(19931200)。傳統農機存量推估模型的檢討與改進--多項基年推估模型的引介。宜蘭農工學報,7,14-36。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gordon, S. F.(1992)。Costs of Adjustment, the Aggregation Problem and Investment。The Review of Economics and Statistics,74(3),422-429。  new window
5.Hamermesh, D. S.(1989)。Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs。American Economic Review,79(4),674-689。  new window
6.Morrison, C. J.(1986)。Productivity Measurement with Non-Static Expectations and Varying Capacity Utilization: an Integrated Approach。Journal of Economics,33,51-74。  new window
7.Pindyck, R. S.、Rotemberg, Julio J.(1983)。Dynamic Factor Demands and the Effects of Energy Price Shocks。American Economic Review,73(5),1066-1079。  new window
8.Flacco, P. R.、Larson, D. M.(1992)。Nonparametric Measures of Scale and Technical Change for Competitive Firms Under Uncertainty。American Journal Agricultural Economics,74,173-176。  new window
9.Watkins, G. Campbell(1993)。Adjustment Costs and Returns to Scale: Some Theoretical and Empirical Aspects。Energy Journal,14(1),257-280。  new window
10.Berndt, E. R.、Fuss, M. A.(1986)。Productivity measurement with adjustments for variations in capacity utilization and other forms of temporary equilibrium。Journal of Econometrics,33,7-29。  new window
11.Jones, P. C.、Zydiak, J. L.、Hopp, W. J.(1989)。Stable Economic Depreciation Neutral Replacement Decisions。The Engineering Economist,34(2),115-127。  new window
12.黃寶祚(19850600)。美國多因素生產力衡量之理論與實務。主計月報,59(6),25-29。  延伸查詢new window
13.傅祖壇、周濟(19880900)。生產者對新技術接受性之經濟及統計模型。臺灣土地金融季刊,24(3)=97,1-13。  延伸查詢new window
14.李朝賢(19890100)。臺灣農業資源與調整之研究。農業金融論叢,21,13-34。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.梁國源、王國雍(1989)。我國國內生產毛額總項預測與分項預測總合之比較。台灣計量經濟模型研討會。台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。173-206。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃寶祚(1990)。臺灣農業資本形成與生產力反應模式之理論與實證。79年中國農村經濟學會學術論文研討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃寶祚(1992)。台灣農業資本存量的推估與實證。81年中國農村經濟學會學術論文研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃寶祚(1994)。生產力理論模型之修正與應用。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院主計處(1993)。我國產業多因素生產力趨勢分析報告。行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(1993)。產業多因素生產力衡量與評估之研究。行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
3.Varian, H. R.(1990)。Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach。New York:W. W. Norton & Company Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE