:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一個次序理論和IRT之整合模式
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:劉湘川許天維 引用關係郭伯臣 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Hsiang-chuanSheu, Tian-weiKuo, Bor-chen
出版日期:1996
卷期:10
頁次:頁367-391
主題關鍵詞:次序理論試題反應理論IRT
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:31
     近年來,認知理論的發展,電腦科技的進步,使分析試題的方法逐漸豐富。其中,最為學者所引用的有試題反應理論(IRT)、次序理論及試題關聯結構分析法(IRS)。本研究的主要目的就是試圖以數學方法來結合次序理論及IRT兩種理論,形成以IRT為基礎的次序理論(ordering theory based on IRT; ODIRT),來呈現受試者多方面的試題訊息,主要發現有:1.ODIRT是結合次序理論與IRT兩者之優點的新式理論。 2.ODIRT除了能像次序理論一樣,可以診斷班級學生學習結構,了解班級學生的全盤概念,更可針對個別受試者實施,進而成為改善或補救教學方面的依據,同時提供教科書編者在修改教科書或教學指引時之參考。3.藉由試題反應結構分析法的分析結果,可了解能力由低到高的學生,試題間結構變化的情形。   根據發現結果,本研究亦提出以下建議:1.未來宜配合電腦化適性測驗進行診斷測驗。2.由詮釋結構分析法得到專家結構圖與經由測驗的試題反應結構分析法獲得的生手結構圖作一比較,可得兩者之間的差異。3.將來可配合「概念影響曲線」,以構成個別受試者的概念結構圖。 4.將來宜發展試題誤反應結構圖來偵測的學生錯誤規律性類型。
     Recently, the development in cognitive theory and the progress in computer technology have been enriching the methods of test-item analysis. Item response theory (IRT), ordering theory and item relational structure analysis (IRS) are among these modern test methods widely used by researchers. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the theory and practices of ordering theory based on IRT(ODIRT) that integrate the theories of IRT and ordering theory. ODIRT was able to provide researchers with multi-faceted item information. The following is a summar of the main findings of this study: 1. ODIRT is a new test method that combines the virtues of both IRT and ordering theory. 2. ODIRT, similar to ordering theory or IRS, enables researchers to diagnose examinees' learning structures and their overall concept of the learning materials. It provides not only students' academic improvement information for remedial teachers but also suggestions and directions for textbook and instruction manual writers. 3. The results of the ODIRT enable researchers to obtain test item structures for students of different ability levels. Based on the findings of this study, the authors made the following recommendations for future research: 1.It is feasible to use computer adaptive test for diagnostic tests. 2.Researchers can compare "expert structure" from Interpretative structural modeling with "novice structure" from test item response analysis. 3.It is feasible to develop "Concept Influence Curve", which can display the pesonal structure of concepts on students' different ability levels. 4.It is feasible to develop "Test Item Error Reflection Structure" to detect students' regular error types.
期刊論文
1.Andrich, D.(1978)。A binomial latent trait model for the study of Likert-style attitude questionnaires。British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,31,84-98。  new window
2.簡茂發、劉湘川、許天維、林原宏(19950100)。試題關聯結構分析法在國小高年級學生乘除文字題列式之分析研究。測驗年刊,42,113-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Airasian, P. W.、Bart, W. M.(1973)。Ordering theory: A new and useful measurement model。Journal of Education Technology,5,56-60。  new window
4.郭伯臣、施淑娟(19951200)。從試題特徵曲線到概念影響曲線。測驗統計年刊,3,125-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉湘川、許天維、郭伯臣、胡豐榮(19940600)。試題關聯結構分析法及其在國小數學科教學上的應用。初等教育研究集刊,2,11-26。  延伸查詢new window
6.湯維玲(19940600)。結構式學習理論及其教學單元示例。國立編譯館館刊,23(1),337-358。  延伸查詢new window
7.簡茂發、劉湘川、許天維、郭伯臣(19940100)。試題反應理論在國民教育階段國小數學科基本學習成就評量上的運用。測驗年刊,41,1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭富森(19941200)。一個CTT和IRT之整合模式。初等教育學刊,3,101-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bart, W. M.、Krus, D. J.(1973)。An ordering theoretic method to determine hierarchies among items。Educational and Psychological Measurement,33,291-300。  new window
10.Andrich, D.(1982)。An extension of the Rasch model for ratings providing both location and dispersion parameters。Psychometrika,47,105-113。  new window
11.Samejima, F.(1969)。Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores。Psychometric Monograph,17。  new window
12.McDonald, R. P.(1967)。Non-linear factor analysis。Psychometric Monograph,15。  new window
13.Samejima, F.(1973)。Homogeneous case of the continuous response model。Psychometrika,38,203-219。  new window
14.Yu, M. N.(1991)。The assessment of partial knowledge。Journal of National Chengchi University,63,401-428。  new window
15.竹谷誠(1979)。項目關聯構造分析を應用したテストの特性解析。電子通信學會論文誌,62(11),695-702。  延伸查詢new window
16.Masters, G. N.(1982)。A Rasch model for partial credit scoring。Psychometrika,47(2),149-174。  new window
17.Bock, R. D.(1972)。Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories。Psychometrika,37(1),29-51。  new window
會議論文
1.劉湘川、許天維、郭伯臣(1993)。試題關聯結構分析法在國民教育階段國小數學科基本學習成就評量上的運用。中華民國第九屆科學教育研討會。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.竹谷誠、根本勝、山田完、岡田裕(1979)。テストやアンケートの構造を吟味するためのIRSグラフの作り方.使い方。電子通信學會教育技術研究會,17-24。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Tatsuoka, K. K.、Tatsuoka, M. M.(1981)。Item analysis of tests designed for diagnosing bugs: Item relational structure analysis method。Urbana, IL:University of Illinois, Computer-based Education Research Laboratory。  new window
2.Samejima, F.(1988)。Final Report: Advancement of latent trait theory。Office of Naval Research。  new window
學位論文
1.郭伯臣(1995)。無參數試題反應理論與試題順序結構分析法之多點計分整合模式(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡豐榮(1995)。國小五年級學生理解『十進數』單元位值相關概念之探討(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉兆文(1994)。「無參數試題反應理論之等化模式」適用性之探討:國小數學科成就測驗之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳怡欣(1994)。試題反應理論與知識結構分析在國小六年級學生社會科學習成就評量上(碩士論文)。台北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.Yu, M. N.(1991)。Two-parameter partial credit model(博士論文)。University of Illinois,Urbana, IL。  new window
6.Wise, S. L.(1981)。A modified order analysis procedure for determining unidimensional item sets(博士論文)。University of Illinois。  new window
圖書
1.許天維(1994)。數學試題分析法--以「八十一學年度國民教育階段國小組數學科基本成就評量」分析為例。高雄市:大漢唐有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lord, F. M.(1980)。Application of item response theory to practical testing problems。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Lord, F. M.、Novick, M. R.(1968)。Statistic theory of mental test scores。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
4.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H.、Rogers, H. J.(1991)。Fundamentals of item response theory。Newbury Park, CA:SAGE。  new window
5.Chevalaz, G. M.、Tatsuoka, K. K.(1983)。A Comparative Analysis of Two Order Analytic Techniques: Assessing Item Hierarchies in Real and Simulated Data。Urbana, Illinois:University of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory。  new window
6.Rasch, G.(1960)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests。Copenhagen:Denmark's Pedagogisk Institute for Educational Research。  new window
7.Rasch, G.(1980)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(1990)。Of BILOG: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer program]。Mooresvill, IN:Scientific Software。  new window
9.Scandnra, J. M.、Scandura, A. B.(1980)。Structural learning and concrete operations: An approach to Piagetian conservation。N. Y.:Praeger。  new window
10.Wright, B. D.、Stone, M. H.(1979)。Best test design。Chicago:MESA Press。  new window
11.Wright, B. D.、Masters, G. N.(1982)。Rating scale analysis。Chicago:MESA Press。  new window
12.Thissen, D.(1988)。MULTILOG: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory [Computer program]。Mooresville, IN:Scientific Software。  new window
13.平林一榮、Skemp, R. R.(1992)。新しい學習理論にもとづく算數教育。東京:東洋館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.竹谷誠(1991)。新.テスト理論。東京:早稻田大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
15.佐藤隆博(1987)。ISM結構分析法。東京:明治圖書出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
16.佐藤隆博(1982)。S-P表の活用。東京:明治圖書出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
17.芝祐順(1991)。項目反應理論。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
18.阪元昂(1980)。授業改善の技法。東京:明治圖書出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H.(1985)。Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications。Boston, Massachusetts:Kluwer-Nijhoff。  new window
單篇論文
1.郭伯臣,田聖才(1995)。IRST1:試題反應結構分析程式。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bimbaum, A.(1968)。Some latent trait models and their uses in inferring an examinee's ability。Statistical theories of mental test scores。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
2.Angoff, W. H.(1971)。Scales, norms, and equivalent scores。Educational measurement。American Council on Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE