From the perspectives of encoding and decoding, the paper reviews the claims that Chinese graphs (mainly xinsheng) are: 1. logographic and 2. opague in terms of graph--sound relationship. These claims are based on the understanding that Chinese graphs are holistic while alphabetical writing systems are analytic. The paper demonstrates that such understanding is inaccurate from the perspective of encoding and lacks support from psycholinguistic experiments. In the final analysis, Chinese graphs are both holistic and analytic. This is the characteristic that can account for many unexpected results in psycholinguistic experiments.