:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:分配政治在臺灣地區的初探:臺灣省政府環境保護補助款分配之分析
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:羅清俊 引用關係
作者(外文):Luor, Ching-jyuhn
出版日期:1997
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁43-72
主題關鍵詞:分配政治分配理論臺灣省議會臺灣省政府環境保護Distributive theoryDistributive politicsTaiwan provincial governmentTaiwan provincial assemblyEnvironmental protection
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:59
     本文以臺灣省政府從 77 會計年度至 84 會計年度分配給 21 縣市之環境保護款 作為個案,檢視是否分配理論可以解釋臺灣省政府補助款分配的結果。研究結果發現,臺灣 省議會的內部結構因素對於省政府環保補助款的分配影響不大。除了省議員的資深程度以外 ,省議員的政黨屬性或省議員是否為相關委員會委員等因素對於補助款的分配並無顯著之影 響。不過,需求變數 (Need variable) 之一 " 各縣市工廠的密度 ",明顯影響補助款的分 配。從這些研究結果來看,美國的分配理論所隱含的分配政治並未在本案例中獲得支持,不 過此結果也同時代表著臺灣可能存在另一種形式的分配政治,這些可能需要未來研究進一步 地檢驗。
     This paper applies distributive theory to Taiwan by examining the distribution of environmental expenditures from Taiwan Provincial Government (TPG) to 21 cities or counties from FY1988 to FY1995. Descriptive analysis shows that local governments in Taiwan rely heavily on the TPG's environmental grants, and the discrepancy between winning cities (or counties) and losing cities (or counties) tend to be large. Multivariate analysis indicates that, while seniority of Taiwan Provincial legislators moderately affects the distribution of provincial spending, committee membership and partisanship in Taiwan Provincial Assembly rarely display significant effects. These results suggest that the characteristics of distributive politics in the United States might not exist in Taiwan. However, it also suggests that a certain form of distributive politics may work in some ways in Taiwan. Further exploration is needed for answering this question.
期刊論文
1.Deckard, Barbara(1972)。State Party Delegations in the U.S. House of Representatives: A Comparative Study of Group Cohesion。The Journal of Politics,34,199-222。  new window
2.Deckard, Barbara(1973)。State Delegations in the United States House of Representatives: An Analysis of Group Action。Polity,5,311-334。  new window
3.Hamman, John A.(1993)。Universalism, Program Development, And the Distribution of Federal Assistance。Legislative Studies Quarterly,18,553-568。  new window
4.Niou, Emerson、Ordeshook, Peter(1985)。Universalism in Congress。American Journal of Political Science,29,246-258。  new window
5.Rohde, David W.(1994)。Parties and Committees in the House: Members Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements。Legislative Studies Quarterly,19,341-359。  new window
6.Rundquist, Barry S.、Griffith, David E.(1976)。An Interrupted Time-Series Test of the Distributive Theory of Military Policy-Making。Western Political Quarterly,29,620-626。  new window
7.Weingast, Barry、Marshall, William(1988)。The Industrial Organization of Congress: or, Why Legislatures, like Firms, are not Organized as Markets。Journal of Political Economy,96,132-163。  new window
8.Wilson, Rick(1986)。An Empirical Test of Preference for the Political Pork Barre (1986) District Level Outlays for River and Harbor Legislation, 1899-1913。American Journal of Political Science,30,621-649。  new window
9.Weingast, Barry R.、Shepsle, Kenneth A.、Johnsen, Christopher(1981)。The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics。Journal of Political Economy,89(4),642-664。  new window
10.Collie, Melissa P.(1988)。Universalism and the Parties in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1921-1980。American Journal of Political Science,32,865-883。  new window
11.Plott, Charles R.(1968)。Some Organizational Influences on Urban Renewal Decisions。American Economic Review,58,306-321。  new window
12.Ritt, Leonard G.(1976)。Committee Position, Seniority, and the Distribution of Government Expenditures。Public Policy,24,463-489。  new window
13.Rich, Michael J.(1989)。Distributive Politics and The Allocation of Federal Grants。American Political Science Review,83,193-213。  new window
14.Strom, Gerald S.(1975)。Congressional Policy Making: A Test of a Theory。Journal of Politics,37,711-735。  new window
15.Lowi, Theodore J.(1964)。American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory。World Politics,16(4),677-715。  new window
16.Collie, Melissa P.(1988)。The Rise of Coalition Politics: Voting in the U. S. House, 1933-1980。Legislative Studies Quarterly,13(3),321-342。  new window
17.Weingast, Barry R.(1979)。A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms。American Journal of Political Science,23(2),245-262。  new window
會議論文
1.Alvarez, R. Michael、Saving, Jason(1994)。Feeding At the Trough: Committees and The Political Economy of Federal Outlays to Congressional Districts。Annual Meeting of Midwest Political Science Association。  new window
研究報告
1.台灣省議會。台灣省議會公報,第八屆。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣省議會。台灣省議會公報,第九屆。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院環境保護署(1988)。環境保護統計年報。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Rich, Michael J.(1985)。Congress, Bureaucracy, and the Cities: Distributive Politics and the Allocation of Federal Grants for Community and Economic Development(博士論文)。Northwestern University。  new window
2.Strom, Gerald S.(1973)。Congressional Policy-Making and the Federal Waste Treatment Construction Grant Program(博士論文)。University of Illinois。  new window
圖書
1.Rich, Michael J.(1993)。Federal Policymakinhg and The Poor: National Goals, Local Choices, and Distributional Outcomes。New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Arnold, R. Douglas(1979)。Congress and the Bureaucracy: A theory of Influence。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
3.Lowi, Theodore J.(1979)。The End of Liberalism。New York:W. W. Norton。  new window
4.Easton, David(1965)。A Framework for Political Analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Matthew D.(1993)。Legislative Leviathan。CA:University of California。  new window
6.Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hamm, Keith E.(1985)。Legislative Committee, Executive Agencies, And Interest Group。Handbook of Legislative Research。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Rundquist, Barry S.(1980)。On the Theory of Political Benefits in American Public Programs。Political Benefits。MA:Lexington Books。  new window
3.Rundquist, Barry S.、Ferejohn, John A.(1975)。Two American Expenditure Programs Compared。Comparative Public Policy。New York:Wiley Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE