探討研究語言隱喻與教育關係的理論基礎__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	探討研究語言隱喻與教育關係的理論基礎
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	郭實渝
作者(外文)：	Kuo, Shih-yu
出版日期：	1997
卷期：	27:4
頁次：	頁21-52
主題關鍵詞：	隱喻；語言哲學；來源區；目標區；製圖；Metaphor；Philosophy of language；Source domain；Tar-get domain；Mapping
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:15

　　　　　本文的目的在探討當代隱喻理論之不同分析途徑，以拉克福與強森的理論為主軸，深入討論他們提出的，以經驗型態及認知模式說明抽象概念立基之問題。在隱喻與教育之關係的研究方面，作者以拉克福與強森的理論為基準，說明除了對教育概念的各種探討及應用隱喻作為一種刻意設計的教學方法之外，拉克福與強森所分析的生活裡的隱喻，在教育上更具深遠的影響力量。這種在教育活動中，以個人經驗、認知與概念形成的隱喻應用，就不一定是刻意設計的教育語言或學習工具。它們在教育活動上，尤其是師生之間的溝通及學習成果的產生裡，均扮演重要的角色。

以文找文

　　　　　There have only been a few studies done on issues about metaphors and educational activities, though metaphors have become a prominent focus in philosophy of language and linguistic studies during the past 30 years, and many educators have tried to develop some instructional program by using metaphors as a way of transmitting concepts and ideas. The purpose of this paper is to try to establish the theoretical foundation for studying the relationship between metaphors and educational activities. Among many theories of metaphors, Lakoff and Johnson's theory provides an adequate interpretation of the construction of human concepts and the human cognitive model with an experiential base. Their theory also provides a better explanation on language usage in educational function than other theories. After exploring Lakoff and Johnson's theory in detail, the author discusses some studies done on metaphors and educational activities. Two aspects are discussed. One is an analysis of the concept of "education" in metaphorical statements which has caused some concern with educational philosophers. The other is the usage of metaphorical statements that can be constructed in order to promote learning results. We find that both aspects have not touched on the important problems of the relationship between using metaphors in educational situations and its impact on both teachers and students. 　

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Barrow, Robin(1997)。Language: Definition and Metaphor。Studies in Philosophy and Education，16(1/2)，113-124。
2.	Black, M.(1954)。Metaphor。Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society，55，273-294。

圖書
1.	Alverson, Hoyt(1994)。Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho。The Johns Hopkins University Press。
2.	Scheffler, I.(1979)。Beyond the letter: A philosophical inquiry into ambiguity, vagueness, and metaphor in language。Routledge & Kegan Paul。
3.	Bowers, C. A.、Flinders, D. J.(1990)。Responsive Teaching: An ecological approach to classroom patterns of language, culture, and thought。New York：Teachers College Press。
4.	Indurkhya, B.(1992)。Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach。Boston：Kluwer Academic Publishers。
5.	MacCormac, E. R.(1990)。A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor。Cambridge：A Bradford Book。
6.	Mooij, J. J. A.(1976)。Study of Metaphor。Amsterdam：North-Holland Publishing Company。
7.	Richards, I. A.(1979)。The Philosophy of Rhetoric。New York：Oxford University Press。
8.	Ross, D.(1993)。Metaphor, Meaning and Cognition。New York：Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.。
9.	Scheffler, I.(1978)。The Language of Education。Springfield, III：Charles C. Thomas Publisher。
10.	Taylor, W.(1984)。Metaphors of Education. Heinemann Educational Books。London：University of London。
11.	Beardsley, Monroe C.(1981)。Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism。Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.。
12.	Way, Eileen Cornell(1991)。Knowledge Representation and Metaphor。Kluwer Academic Publishers。
13.	Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1980)。Metaphors We Live by。University of Chicago Press。

圖書論文
1.	Glucksberg, Sam、Keysar, Boas(1993)。How Metaphors Work。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge University Press。
2.	Reddy, Michael J.(1979)。The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge University Press。
3.	Cohen, T.(1978)。Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy。On Metaphor。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。
4.	Davidson, D.(1978)。What Metaphors Mean。On Metaphor。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。
5.	Elgin, E. Z.(1995)。Metaphor and Reference。From a Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor。Berlin：Walter de Gruyter & Co.。
6.	Grady, J.、Taub, S.、Morgan, P.(1996)。Primitive and Compound Metaphors。Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language。Stanford, CA：Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications。
7.	Green, T. F.(1993)。Learning without Metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
8.	Kittay, E. F.(1995)。Metaphor as Rearranging the Furniture of the Mind: A Reply to Donald Davidson's 'What Metaphors Mean'。From a Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor。Berlin：Walter de Gruyter & Co.。
9.	Mayer, Richard E.(1993)。The Instructive Metaphor: Metaphoric Aids to Students Understanding of Science。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
10.	Ortony, A.(1993)。Preface。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
11.	Petrie, H. G.、Oshlag, R. S.(1993)。Metaphor and Learning。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
12.	Searle, J. R.(1993)。Metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
13.	Sticht, T. G.(1993)。Educational Uses of Metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
14.	Lakoff, George(1993)。The contemporary theory of metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge University Press。
15.	Black, M.(1993)。More about metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	共有文化、生態智慧與教師永續素養--C. A. Bowers與郭實渝觀點之研究
2.	回顧個人在「教育哲學」思考的導向
3.	學校是什麼？國民中學學校隱喻之研究
4.	莊子的語言哲學及表意方式

1.	隱喻模式應用於國中資優生高層次思考教學成效之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫