:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育課程模式--體適能教育模式之實施探討
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:鐘敏華 引用關係
作者(外文):Chung, Min-hua
出版日期:1998
卷期:8
頁次:頁123-150
主題關鍵詞:體育課程模式體適能教育模式健康體能Fitness education model health-related fitness physical education curriculum models
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:61
     本研究在探討體育課程模式之體適能教育模式,於實際教學情境之實施中,對體 能檢測成績、未來運動習慣的養成,和設計與實施體適能活動時最困難的因素。 以八十五學年度,選修國立花蓮師範學院「身體健康管理」通識課程的同年級學生,共 六十四人(男生十二人,女生五十二人)為研究對象。一學期十八週,每週九十分鐘的體適能 認知與實際操作的課程,主要在教導學生獲得身體活動與健康的關係、運動技能對健康的好 處,和實行運動的重要性等知識,用意在維持或增進學生的個別健康體能。 在教師講授、講義及資料補充、體能檢測、學生自行設計並執行體適能活動設計表和團 體及個別諮詢與討論的教學活動中,於學期第二週及最後一週進行體能檢測及問卷調查,分 析資料而得下列結論: (一)受試學生透過體適能教育課程的學習與實際操作,心肺適能、腹部肌力與肌耐力和 柔軟度的成績,有顯著進步;身體質量指數則沒有達到顯著水準。 (二)有76.6%的受試學生認為透過體適能教育課程的介紹和實際操作,有助未來運動習 慣的養成;一星期從事運動的次數以「1-2次(天)」和「3次(天)」為多;每次運動的平均時間 多在「21分鐘」以上;自覺的運動強度為「普通」;教學後有明顯的運動次數與時間的增加。 (三)設計個人體適能活動時,最困擾的共同因素是:「運動強度的控制」、「獎懲的方式」、 「實施方式」、「運動項目的選擇」和「操作時間的安排」等因素為多。 (四)實施個人體適能活動設計表時,最困難的共同因素是:「偷懶藉口太多」、「無法在固 定時間實施」和「天氣」等因素為多。
     The main purpose of this study was to investigate the fitness education model implementation in the real teaching setting. Specifically, the cultivation of future exercise habits and the difficulty factors in s self-designed and self-implemented fitness program. A physical education teacher with seven-years teaching experience and sixty- four college students(52 females; 12 males) enrolled in an elective " Physical Fitness" course were served as subjects in this study. The duration for a semester was eighteen weeks. Students meet once a week for 90 minutes. Teaching methods included teacher lectures, teaching aids, fitness testing, unit demostrations and activities, self-designed and self-implemented fitness program, and group and individual discussions. Instruction were provided to enable the students to understand the body composition and its functions, to acquire knowledge about the relationship between health and physical activity, and to familiarize with different methods for maintaining or improving good health. The fitness testing and question-naires were done on the second and last week of the semester. Dependent t-test and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Within the limitions of this study, the following conclusions were derived: 1.Cardio respiratory endurance, abdominal strengh and endurance, and flexibility were significantly improved. 2.Most students(76.6% ) thought the "Physical Fitness" " course was helpful to culti-vate future exercise habits. There was an increase in exercise frequency, duration, and intensity after the course. 3.The self-designed fitness program had four common difficulty factors: the control of intensity, the selection of mode, awards and controls, and the arrangement of activity schedules. 4.The self-implemented fitness program had three common difficulty factors laziness or too many excuses, wouldn't follow the activity schedule, and weather problems.
期刊論文
1.Smith, K. T.(1994)。High school fitness units--Teaching lifetime skills。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,65,69-72。  new window
2.Smith, K. T.、Cestaro, N.(1995)。Teaching health/fitness concepts to elementary students--A modular strategy。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,66,69-72。  new window
3.Hopple, C.、Graham, G.(1995)。What Children Think, Feel, and Know about Physical Fitness Testing。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,14,408-417。  new window
4.體育課程系統化規劃研究小組(19920900)。「體育課程系統化規劃」專題研究。國民體育季刊,21(3)=94,10-40。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lashuk, M.、Vickers, J.(1987)。The ranking of physical education objectives by four groups。International Journal of Physical Education,24(3),18-26。  new window
6.國立台南師範學院大三體育組(1996)。國立台南師範學院八十五年度一、二年級學生體能測驗報告。南師體育,4,49-62。  延伸查詢new window
7.Steinhardt, M.、Lambdin, D.、Kamrath, M.、Ramirez, T.(1993)。An analysis of student teachers' intentional, perceived, and operational motor skills and physical fitness curriculum。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,12,134-148。  new window
會議論文
1.教育部(1997)。教育部八十六年度提昇國民體能計畫--國民體能行政人員研習會手冊。教育部八十六年度提昇國民體能計畫--國民體能行政人員研習會。台北:國立台灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.鐘敏華(1997)。學生期望體育教師協助提昇體能之因素調查。國立花蓮師範學院創校五十週年學術研討會。花蓮:國立花蓮師範學院教務處學術服務組。  延伸查詢new window
3.Freedson, P. S.(1995)。Physical fitness in children and youth in the United State: Promotion of active lifestyles。1995年國際體適能研習會。台北:國立台灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展心。26-55。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kirby, T.(1995)。Physical fitness in American schools。1995年國際體適能研習會。台北:國立台灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心。151-164。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Keh, N. C.(1993)。Students' use of teacher feedback during badminton instruction(博士論文)。Louisiana State University,Baton Rouge, LA。  new window
圖書
1.Jewett, A. E.(1991)。Chestnut Hill Community School behavioral fitness education project。Athens, GA:University of Georgia。  new window
2.Jewett, A. E.、Bain, L. L.、Ennis, C. D.(1995)。The Curriculum Process in Physical Education。Iowa:Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc。  new window
3.Mathews, Donald K.、Fox, Edward L.、林正常(1983)。運動生理學:訓練的科學基礎。臺北:健行文化出版事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃明玉(1987)。體適能運動訓練的理論與實際。花蓮:真義。  延伸查詢new window
5.Billings Public Schools(1990)。Health enhancement curriculum。Billings, MT:Billings Public Schools。  new window
6.Gwinnett County Public Schools(1991)。PE101: Introduction to health related fitness resource guide。Lawrenceville, GA:Gwinnett County Public Schools。  new window
7.Montana Office of Public Instruction(1989)。Health enhancement: A design for Montana's future。Helena, MT:Montana Office of Public Instruction。  new window
8.U. S. Department of Health and Human Services(1991)。Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objective。Washington, DC:U. S. Government Printing Office。  new window
9.方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。漢文書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.American College of Sports Medicine(1991)。Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:Lea & Febiger。  new window
11.卓俊辰(1986)。體適能:健身運動處方的理論與實際。國立臺灣師範大學體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top