:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體適能教育模式對兒童健康體適能與身體自我概念之影響
書刊名:國立體育學院論叢
作者:陳彥宏楊進益
作者(外文):Chen, Yen-hungYang, Jin-yih
出版日期:2002
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁165-179
主題關鍵詞:體適能教育模式健康體適能身體自我概念Fitness education modelHealth-related physical fitnessPhysical self-concept
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:43
     本研究之目的在於探討十週體適能教育模式對兒童健康體適能與身體自我概之影響。本研究以臺南市北區大港國民小學36位六年級兒童為研究對象(男生21人,女生18人),研究進行十週之體適能教育模式,每週三節、每節40分鐘的體育課,並在實驗前、後對兒童實施健康體適能與身體自我概念量表測驗,所得資料以相依樣本t考驗來比較兒童健康體能與身體自我概念在實驗前後的差異。所得結果如下:1.經過十週體適能育模式的兒童,在身體組成、肌耐力和心肺耐力等方面的成績表現,明顯優於實驗前的成績,且達顯著水準;2.兒童在「兒童身體自我概念」總量表的得分表現優於前測成績,且達顯著水準;在分量表方面,後測在「柔軟度」、「耐力」、「彈性」、「肌力」等四個自我概念分量表的得分優於前測成績,並達顯著水準。顯示此體能教育模式是一種適合國內兒童使用且可以提昇兒童健康體適能與身體自我概念的體育課程模式。
     The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of fitness education model on health-related physical fitness and physical self-concept of the sixth grade students. This research was based on the data of the 36 students in Tainan Ta-Kang Elementary school (18 females; 21 males). The physical fitness test and children physical self-concept inventory test was administered before and after the experimental classes. The collected data were analyzed by t-test. The main findings were as the followings: 1.The scores before the experimental classes in the aspects of BMI, muscular endurance and cardio-respiratory fitness, and they had reached a remarkable level. 2.The scores of the children got in the inventory were obviously better than those of the pre-test, and reached an outstanding level. The scores of Softness, Elasticity, Endurance, Muscle strength in the sub-Inventory were obviously better than those before the test, and reached a remarkable level. So, this showed that fitness education model was a physical education curriculum model that fitted the children in our country and could enhance the children's health related physical fitness and physical self-concept.
期刊論文
1.Marsh, Herbert W.(1994)。Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to Evaluate Theoretical Models of Self-Concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(3),439-456。  new window
2.March, H. W.(1994)。The importance of being important: Theoretical models of relations between specific and global components of physical self-concept。Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,16,306-325。  new window
3.鍾建忠(19991000)。體適能教育(Fitness Education)在體育教學與活動之應用。學校體育,9(5)=53,8-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.闕月清(19990500)。體適能課程活動設計。臺灣省學校體育,9(3)=51,28-33。  延伸查詢new window
5.李新穎(2000)。淺談如何設計體適能課程。中華體育,14(2),28-33。  延伸查詢new window
6.周宏室、潘義祥(1999)。臺北縣國小教師對體育教學成效達成覺知之研究。國立體育學院論叢,9(2),145-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林秀慧(1995)。運動與身體自我概念之關係。學校體育,5(3),21-25。  延伸查詢new window
8.熊鴻鈞(19990500)。九年一貫制體育課程之我見。臺灣省學校體育,9(3)=51,42-45。  延伸查詢new window
9.Marsh, H. W.、Byrne, B. M.、Shavelson, R. J.(1988)。A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achivevement。Journal of Educational Psychology,80,366-380。  new window
10.葉憲清(1998)。體育教材特性。臺灣學校體育,7(5),50-64。  延伸查詢new window
11.鐘敏華(19980600)。體育課程模式--體適能教育模式之實施探討。花蓮師院學報,8,123-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃文俊(20000300)。坐式生活型態在兒童健康體適能之比較分析研究。體育學報,28,339-348。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Ignico, A. A.、Mahon, A. D.(1995)。The effects of a physical fitness program on low-fit children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,66(1),85-90。  new window
14.教育部(1999)。教育部八十九年度獎勵學校推廣學生體適能教育計畫辦法。國民體育季刊,28,120-124。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.方進隆(2000)。概念導向的體適能教學。2000國際體育教學研討會。中華民國體育學會。9-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.白博仁(1999)。國小學生的性別角色及其與自我概念關係之研究。屏東師院國民教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李彩華(1998)。台北市國中學生身體活動量及其影響因素研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊鵬輝(1996)。兒童身體自我概念與體適能及其建構之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
3.侯雅齡(1998)。國小兒童自我概念量表編製及其相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許義雄(1998)。運動教育與人文關懷(下)課程與教學篇。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2000)。教師體適能指導手冊。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Corbin, C. B.、Lindsey, R.(1990)。Concepts of physical fitness。Dubuque:Wm, C. Brown。  new window
4.Jewett, A. E.(1991)。Chestnut Hill Community School behavioral fitness education project。Athens, GA:University of Georgia。  new window
5.Oliva, P. E.(1992)。Developing the curriculum。NY:Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
6.Strand, B. N.、Scentling, E.、Johnson, M.(1997)。Fitness Eduction, Teaching Concepts-Based Fitness in the School。us:Ally & Bacon。  new window
7.葉憲清(1998)。體育教材教法。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jewett, A. E.、Bain, L. L.、Ennis, C. D.(1995)。The curriculum process in physical education。WCB Brown & Benchmark。  new window
9.林貴福、盧淑雲(2000)。認識健康體能。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.卓俊辰(1992)。體適能--健身運動處方的理論與實際。台北:國立台灣師範大學體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
11.方進隆(1997)。健康體能的理論與實際。臺北市:漢文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.方進隆(2000)。提昇體適能的策略與展望。教師體適能指導手冊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Eisenman, p.(1986)。Physical activity and body composition。Physical activity and well-being。Reston, VA:AAHPERD。  new window
3.Bouchard, C.、Shephard, R. J.(1994)。Physical activity, fitness, and health: The model and key concepts。Physical activity, fitness, and health-international proceedings and consensus statement。Champaign IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE