:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比較兩岸三地生產力成長的來源
書刊名:農業與經濟
作者:張靜貞 引用關係陸怡蕙
作者(外文):Chang, Ching-chengLuh, Yir-hueih
出版日期:1998
卷期:20
頁次:頁13-30
主題關鍵詞:兩岸三地生產力成長生產力指數
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:58
     本文的主要目的是利用Malmquist指數的計算來比較兩岸三地-台灣、香港與大陸 --生產力成長來源的差異。兩岸三地除了政治體系不同外,在經濟結構方面亦有相當差異。藉 由分析與比較兩岸三地生產力成長的來源,進一步瞭解除了傳統性的因素外,究竟還有哪些因 素造成三地生產力的差異,不僅將有助於解釋發展的過程,對政府相關部門擬定經濟發展政 策亦重要的參考價值。 本文以 Penn World Tables 中各 APEC 各會員體的相關資料,利用 線性規劃的方法來計算 Malmquist 生產力成長指數, 並將其分解為效率變動與技術變動兩 者的組成。 結果顯示,兩岸三地在 1980 ~1990 年間,的表現均較 1965~1979 年為佳,在 1965~1979 年間,兩岸三地生產力成長的主要來源皆是基於效率的提昇,尤其是大陸與香港, 兩者的效率變動指數皆大於一。台灣的效率變動指標在同期雖未超過一,但亦離邊界不遠。 兩岸三地在 1980~1990 年間的成長來源,則與 1965~1971 年間有些差異。雖然效率提昇仍 然是大陸與台灣生產力成長的主要來源,香港的生產力成長卻應歸功於效率與技術的共同提 昇。
     This paper focuses on identifying the sources of productivity growth in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. We calculate productivity growth and its components using distance-function-based Malmquist productiviey indexes. The data of our multilateral comparison comes from the Penn World Tables over the 1965-79 and 1980-90 periods. The method constructs a best-practice frontier by using the APEC members as the sample economies and linear programming methods following Fare et al. (1994). Our results indicate that the average performance, in terms of the growth in total factor productivity of each economy, over the second period is better than in the first period. Hong Kong exhibits a pattern for being consistently technically efficient with technology improvement. The source of productivity growth in China and Taiwan largely comes from improvement in efficiency. Therefore, for both china and Taiwan, it is necessary to devote more effort into technological progress to promote economic growth in the future.
期刊論文
1.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurites R.、Diewert, W. Eerwin(1982)。Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers。The Economic Journal,92(365),73-86。  new window
2.Färe, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Norris, M.、Zhang, Z.(1994)。Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries。The American Economic Review,84(1),66-83。  new window
3.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
4.Lindgren, B.、Grosskopf, S.、Fare, R.、Roos, P.、Färe, R.(1992)。Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Nonparametric Malmquist Approach。Journal of Productivity Analysis,3(3),85-101。  new window
5.Heston, A.、Summers, Robert(1991)。The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-87。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,106,1-41。  new window
研究報告
1.Fare, R.、Lindgren, B.、Roos, P.、Grosskopf, S.、Färe, R.(1989)。Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach。Southern Illinois University。  new window
圖書
1.Fare, R.、Grosskopf, S.(1996)。Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.The World Bank(1993)。The East Asian Miracle:Economic Growth & Public Policy。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Peterson, W.、Hayami, Y.(1985)。Technical Change in Agriculture。A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Vol. 1。沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE