:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:三種不同體育教學設計對大專女生健康體能之影響
書刊名:體育學報
作者:李致美王世椿
作者(外文):Li, Chih-meiWang, Shih-chun
出版日期:1998
卷期:25
頁次:頁189-198
主題關鍵詞:健康體能大專女生體育教學Health-related physical fitnessFemale student of collegeTeaching of physical education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:211
  • 點閱點閱:22
     本研究探討三種不同體育教學在10週實驗後對大專女生健康體能之影 響。受試者為醒吾商專五專二年級女生148人(平均年齡16.6∼16.7歲), 依健康體能活動介入一般體育課程時間之不同,隨機區分為高介入組(46 人),低介入組(52人)和仍以一般體育課程進行教學(沒有健康體能介入 活動)之一般組(50人)。並以國立臺灣師大學校體育研究發展中心製訂的 健康體能測驗項目:(一)身體質量指數;(二)坐姿體前彎;(三)一分鐘屈膝仰臥起 坐;(四)立定跳遠;(五)800公尺跑走等五項,另增加肱三頭肌皮脂厚測量,總共 六項為本研究評量項目。結果發現高介入組實驗後坐姿體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐 以及800公尺跑走成績顯著(p<0.05)優於實驗前水準,進步幅度分別為 (21.7%、21.6%和7.4%),低介入組僅屈膝仰臥起坐和800公尺跑走達 顯著進步水準(p<0.05),但兩項進步幅度(14.2%和5.9%)都低於高介入 組,而一般組沒有任何項目顯著改變。結論:10週一般體育教學中,增加健 康體能活動高介入組方式,對改善健康體能效果較大,低介入組效果有限,一 般組沒有任何顯著效果。
     This study investigated the effects of three types of physical education design for the health-related physical fitness (HRPF) after ten weeks training to the female student of college. The 148 second grade students of Hsing Wu College of Commerce, mean age 16.6-16.7 yrs., were studied. According to interfere time of difference with HRPF were separated of random the high interfere (HI) group (no 46); low interfere (LI) group (no. 52) and general physical education teaching as a general (GE) group (no. 50). The examination were assessed using a nationally known (established by Physical Education Research and Development Center National Taiwan Normal University) HRPF test, including 1) body mass index 2)sit and reach 3) one-minute timed sit-ups 4) standing long jump 5)800 meter run-walk, and extra added body fat survey, which total had six items for this research. Results indicated that the HI group had significant (p<0.05) progress in sit and reach (21.7 %)、one-minute timed sit-ups (21.6%) and 800 mater run-walk (7.4%). The LI group had significant (p<0.05) improvement in onr-minute timed sit-ups (14.2%) and 800 meter run-walk (5.9%) only, but all the progressive rates lower than the HI group. The GE group hadn't any significant (p>0.05) improvement in HRPF. Conclusions: The HI group who has large effects that better than the LI group and GE group when the fematle students of college went to improve the HRPF for ten weeks.
期刊論文
1.陳俊豪、陳俊忠(19941200)。大學生健康體能計畫介入之效果研究。體育學報,18,279-290。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Thomas, S. L.、Cunningham, D. A.、Rechnitzer, P. A.、Donner, A. P.、Howard, J. H.(1985)。Determinants of the training response in elderly men。Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.,17,667-672。  new window
3.Chin, L. L.、Lionel, K.、LEE, H.(1994)。The effects of 20 weeks basic military training program on body composition, V02max and aerobic fitness of obese recruits。J. Sports Med, Phys. Fitness,34,271-278。  new window
4.楊忠祥(19900600)。體育教學前後對運動適能成績之研究。臺北師院學報,3,401-418。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳嫣芬、林冠群、卓俊辰(19951200)。不同的教學設計對大專女生健康體適能之影響。體育學報,20,421-432。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林世澤(1994)。大學體適能課程之教學研究。中華民國大專院校八十三年度體育學術研討會,15-34。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.國立臺灣師大學校體育研究發展中心(1994)。八十三學年度提昇國民體能專案學生體能檢測報告書。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林正常(1996)。運動生理學實驗指引。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.省教育廳(1990)。臺灣省中小學生體能訓練手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Prentice, W. E.(1996)。Fitness for college and life。McGraw-Hill:WCB。  new window
4.林正常(1993)。運動科學與訓練:運動教練手冊。臺北縣永和市:銀禾文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際--健康體能評量。臺北市:漢文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.林正常(1997)。運動生理學。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林正常(1997)。體適能的理論基礎。教師體適能指導手冊。臺北市:師大體研中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE