:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:木柵線捷運系統通車前後個體運具選擇模式比較之研究
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:陳敦基 引用關係林新敏
作者(外文):Chen, Dun-jiLin, Hsin-min
出版日期:1998
卷期:27:4
頁次:頁669-706
主題關鍵詞:木柵線捷運系統個體選擇模式事前與事後敘述性偏好整合性偏好Mucha line rapid transitDisaggregate choice modelBefore and afterStated preferenceJoint preference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:45
     木柵線捷運系統為國內首次通車之都市捷運系統,本研究即利用其通車前後所調 查之個體運具選擇或轉移行為資料,進行「事前與事後」比較之實證研究。在通車前行為分 析中,本研究利用「顯示性偏好」與「敘述性偏好」資料分別建立二元、三元及巢式選擇糢 式,並結合此兩類資料建立「整合性偏好模式」。在通車後旅運行為分析中,則建構旅運者 實際選擇結構之顯示性偏好模式。首先在通車前後運具選擇行為一致性之檢定結果顯示,僅 「成本項」參數具一致性評價,而整體模式則不具一致性。因此本研究乃利用更新「運具特 定常數」、「參數尺度」及「效用函數尺度因」等方法,進行通車前後行為模式之比較;比 較結果發現,事前捷運特定常數項被高度高估,而事前運具屬性變數之邊際負效用則相對被 低估。另外,在模式更新前後之驗證中發現:(1)木柵地區之個體運具模式以二元/三元選 擇結構較為適用。(2)事前個體旅運需求以「整合性偏好模式」進行預測,當可獲得較理 想之預測結果;而由多元模式之尺度因子可知,「敘述性偏好」資料較「顯示性偏好」資料 有較大誤差。(3)由「更新效用函數尺度因子」法校估結果得知,選擇結構設定顯然會影 響數據誤差程度之判定。(4)由木柵地區實證經驗得知,利用「更新運具特定常數」法修 正事前模式之預測偏差,不失為一易行且效果良好之方法。
     The purpose of this study is to explore the disaggregate model choice/ switch behavior before and after Mucha line rapid transit operated in Taiwan. In the analysis of pre-choice behavior, the revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) data are used to establish the binary, trinomined and nested choice models, and the combined RP—SP (i.e. joint preference) modle. In the analysis of post-choice behavior, the RP choice model which posses the real choice hierarchy is established. First of all, the consistency between pre-choice and post-choice model is examined. The statistical test shows that only the parameter of cost item is consistent. However, both of these models are inconsistent. Therefore, the pre-choice and post-choice models are compared by employing three methods which are the updated mode-specific costant, the calibrated scale factor of parameter, and the calibrated scale factor of utility function methods. The results of the comparison reveal that the value of rapid-transit-specific constant of pre-choice model is overestimated, but the negative utility value of mode-attribute variable is underestimated. Besides, there are important findings about the calibration of the updating model: (1) The binary and trinominal choice hierarchy of disaggregate model are more suitable to adopt in the Mucha area. (2) In the pre-choice analysis of disaggregate demand, the combined PR-SP model is suggested to be applied to forecast and can gain more accurate forecast result. Besides, the scale parameter of the combined Mutilnominal choice model is less than one, and this result show that the SP data has more estimated that the RP data. (3) As a result of the estimation of the updated scale parameter, the choice structure wil affect the degree of data error. (4) The validation of Mucha Area shows that adopting the updated mode-specific constant methos to adjust the forecast bias of pre-choice model is a easy and good effect method.
期刊論文
1.藍武王、許書耕(19921200)。個體運具選擇模式之校估與應用:新運具之引進。交大管理學報,12(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ben-Akiva, M.、Morikawa, T.(1990)。Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions。Transportation Research,24(6),485-495。  new window
3.Wardman, M.(1991)。Stated Preference Methods and Travel Demand Forecasting: An Examination of the Scale Factor Problem。Transportation Research, Part A: General,25A,79-89。  new window
4.Wardman, M.(1988)。A Comparison of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behaviour。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,22,71-91。  new window
5.Atherton, T. J.、Ben-Akiva, M.(1976)。Transferability and Updating of Disaggregate Travel Demand Models。Transportation Research Record,610,12-18。  new window
6.Ben-Akiva, M.、Morikawa, T.(1989)。Data Combination and Updating Methods for Travel Surveys。Transportation Research Record,1203,40-47。  new window
7.Bolduc, D.、Ben-Akiva, M.(1991)。Approaches to Model Transferability and Updating: The Combined Transfer Estimator。Transportation Research Record,1139,1-7。  new window
8.Ben-Akiva, M. E.、Bradley, M. A.、Gunn, H. F.(1985)。Tests of the Scaling Approach to Transferring Disaggregate Travel Demand Models。Transportation Research Record,1037,21-31。  new window
9.Koppelman, F. S.、Wilmot, C. G.(1982)。Transferability Analysis of Disaggregate Choice Model。Transportation Research Record,895,18-24。  new window
10.Koppelman, F. S.(1983)。Predicting Transit Ridership in Response to Transit Service Change。Journal of Transportation Engineering,109,548-564。  new window
11.Koppelman, F. S.、Geok-Koon, K.、Wilmot, C. G.(1985)。Transfer Model Updating with Disaggregate Data。Transportation Research Record,1037,102-107。  new window
12.McCarthy, P. S.(1982)。Further Evidence on the Temporal Stability of Disaggregate Travel Demand Models。Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological,16(4),58-62。  new window
13.Swait, J.、Louviere, J. J.、Williams, M.(1994)。A Sequential Approach to Exploiting the Combined Strengths of SP and RP Data: Application to Freight Shipper Choice。Transportation,21,135-152。  new window
14.Train, K. H.(1978)。A Validation Test of a Disaggregate Mode Choice Model。Transportation Research,12,167-174。  new window
15.Hirobata, Y.、Kawakawi, S.(1990)。Modeling Disaggregate Behavioral Model Switching Models Based on Intention Data。Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological,24(1),15-25。  new window
16.陳敦基、王士玫(1994)。捷運系統木柵線通車前個體運具轉移行為之研究。運輸,25,75-103。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳敦基、劉凱平(1995)。都市個體運具轉換行為模式之可移轉性分析。沒有紀錄。793-799。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.藍武王(1990)。捷運系統運價費率計算公式與票價之擬定。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.溫傑華(1989)。捷運系統與公車費率整合後轉車折扣對運具選擇之影響,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳敦基(1990)。潛在客運需求分析與客運需求門檻模式建立之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE