The purpose of this study is to explore the disaggregate model choice/ switch behavior before and after Mucha line rapid transit operated in Taiwan. In the analysis of pre-choice behavior, the revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) data are used to establish the binary, trinomined and nested choice models, and the combined RP—SP (i.e. joint preference) modle. In the analysis of post-choice behavior, the RP choice model which posses the real choice hierarchy is established. First of all, the consistency between pre-choice and post-choice model is examined. The statistical test shows that only the parameter of cost item is consistent. However, both of these models are inconsistent. Therefore, the pre-choice and post-choice models are compared by employing three methods which are the updated mode-specific costant, the calibrated scale factor of parameter, and the calibrated scale factor of utility function methods. The results of the comparison reveal that the value of rapid-transit-specific constant of pre-choice model is overestimated, but the negative utility value of mode-attribute variable is underestimated. Besides, there are important findings about the calibration of the updating model: (1) The binary and trinominal choice hierarchy of disaggregate model are more suitable to adopt in the Mucha area. (2) In the pre-choice analysis of disaggregate demand, the combined PR-SP model is suggested to be applied to forecast and can gain more accurate forecast result. Besides, the scale parameter of the combined Mutilnominal choice model is less than one, and this result show that the SP data has more estimated that the RP data. (3) As a result of the estimation of the updated scale parameter, the choice structure wil affect the degree of data error. (4) The validation of Mucha Area shows that adopting the updated mode-specific constant methos to adjust the forecast bias of pre-choice model is a easy and good effect method.