:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市啟智幼兒班回歸主流實施現況與相關問題研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:鄒啟蓉
作者(外文):Tsou, Chi-zong
出版日期:1998
卷期:16
頁次:頁151-169
主題關鍵詞:啟智幼兒班
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:178
     本研究旨在探討:(1)臺北市自足式啟智幼兒班實施回歸主流現況;(2)教 師對實施回歸主流的看法與建議;(3)教師對實施混合教育的看法與建議;(4)教師對 目前實施回歸主流的滿意程度。 本研究對象包括臺北市 11 個自足式啟幼班、21 名啟幼班 教師及各園啟幼班教師推薦的普通班教師 7 名,共 28 名教師。 本研究採半結構式訪談法 與問卷調查法,分兩階段進行;使用工具為自編訪談題綱及「回歸主流及混合教育實施要素 重要性與實施程度自我評鑑調查表」。本研究主要的發現有:(1)臺北市現有 11 個自足 式啟智幼兒班皆有實施回歸主流,但回歸的時段多利用全園性的活動和不定期的社交聯誼活 動; (2)全市現有 52 名自足式啟智幼兒班學生中,有 8 位除參加全班性的回歸主流活 動外,也被安排作個別化的回歸;有的啟智幼兒班學生智力接近正常,但回歸時仍有不適應 的問題;(3)影響回歸主流的因素錯綜複雜,有的與整個幼稚園有關,有的則牽涉到普通 班內、特殊班內、普通班和特殊班的關係、老師與家長間的關係等生態因素;(4)啟智幼 兒班教師對回歸主流或混合教育實施要素的看法頗一致;(5)啟智幼兒班教師對回歸主流 實施情形不甚滿意。根據研究結果,提出對實施回歸主流或混合教育與未來研究方向的建議 。
     The purpose of the study was to investigate: (1) the current status of mainstreaming in public preschool programs for children with mental retardation in Taipei city; (2) teachers' opinions about mainstreaming; (3) teachers' opinions about placing mildly-delayed children in regular preschool classrooms; (4) teachers' self-evaluation about the current status of mainstreaming. A total of 28 teachers including 21 special education teachers and 7 regular classroom teachers coming from 11 public preschool programs attended the study. Interviews and self-made questionnaire were given face-to-face to the subjects. Main findings included: (1) all 11 programs had mainstreaming activities, yet, the activities used were mainly whole-school activities and irregular social-leisure activities; (2) 8 out of 52 students in all programs had individualized mainstreaming opportunities; some students with near-normal intelligence adjusted poorly in the process of mainstreaming; (3) Factors affecting mainstreaming included ecological variables affecting the whole preschool, the regular classrooms, the special education classrooms and relationship between teachers and parents; (4) opinions about critical components needed for successful mainstreaming were quite consistent among special education teachers; (5) special education teachers were not satisfied with the current status of mainstreaming. Suggestions were made for future research and implementing mainstreaming in preschools.
期刊論文
1.Brown, L.、Long, E.、Udvari-Solner, A.、Schwartz, P.、Van-Deventer, P.、Ahlgren, C.、Johnson, F.、Gruenewalk, L.、Jorgensen, J.(1989)。Should students with severe intellectual disabilities be based in regular or in special education classrooms in home schools?。The Journal of The Association for People with Severe Handicaps,14(1),8-12。  new window
2.Buysse, V.、Bailey, D. B.(1993)。Behavioral and developmental outcomes in young children with disabilities in integrated and segregated settings: A review of comparative studies。Journal of Special Education,26(4),434-461。  new window
3.Gottleib, J.(1987)。Mainstreaming: Fulling the promise。American Journal of Mental Deficiency,86(2),115-126。  new window
4.Guralnick, M. J.(1990)。Major accomplishments and future directions in early childhood mainstreaming。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,10(2),1-17。  new window
5.Tawney, J. W.(1981)。A cautious view of mainstreaming in early education。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,1(1),25-36。  new window
6.吳美慧、翁素雅(19951000)。幼稚園教師對特殊教育之態度及相關知識之需求調查研究。臺東特教,2,25-36。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.臺灣省立台北師範學院研究小組(1990)。學前階段特殊教育問題研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳淑美、陳昭儀(1991)。父母對學前回歸主流態度之研究。教育部國民教育司。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭秀鳳(1996)。幼兒家長與幼教工作者對實施融合式幼兒教育意見之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lipsky, D. K.、Gartner, A.(1997)。Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms。Baltimore, MA:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
2.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael(1984)。Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods。Sage Publications。  new window
3.Patton, M. Q.(1987)。Depth interviewing: How to use qualitative methods in evaluation。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peck, C. A.、Furman, G. C.、Helmstetter, E.(1993)。Integrated early childhood programs: Research on the implementation of change in organizational contexts。Integrating Young Children with Disabilities Into Community Programs: Ecological Perspectives on Research and Implementation。Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
2.Bricker, D. D.(1978)。A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children。Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children。Baltimore, MA:University Park Press。  new window
3.Guralnick, J.(1987)。The application of child development principles and research to preschool mainstreaming。Mainstreaming handicapped children: Outcomes, controversies, and new directions。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Halvorsen, A. T.、Sailor, W.(1990)。Integration of students with severe and profound disabilities: review of research。Issues and research in special education。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Meyer, L. H.、Kishi, G. S.(1985)。School integration strategies。Strategies for achieving community integration of developmentally disabled citizens。  new window
6.Odom, S. L.、McEvoy, M. A.(1988)。Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children。Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base。Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
7.Stainback, W. S.、Stainback, W.(1985)。Examining and fostering integrated school experiences。Integrating moderately and severely handicapped learners: Strategies that work。Springfield, IL:Charles C. Thomas Publisher。  new window
8.Stainback, W.、Stainback, S.、Moravec, J.、Jackson, H. J.(1992)。Concerns about full inclusion: An ethnographic investigation。Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools。Baltimore, MA:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
9.Yoshida, R.(1986)。Setting goals for mainstream programs。Mainstreaming Handicapped Children: Outcomes, Controversies, and New Directions。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE