:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:打破“文化貧困陷阱”的路徑--基於貧困地區農村公共文化建設的調研
書刊名:圖書館論壇
作者:陳前恒方航
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(6)
頁次:45-54
主題關鍵詞:貧困地區農村地區公共文化文化貧困陷阱文化扶貧精準扶貧Poverty-stricken areasRural areasPublic cultureCultural poverty trapCultural poverty alleviationTargeted poverty alleviation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
針對貧困地區鄉村社會中存在的"文化貧困陷阱",文章認為促進貧困地區農村公共文化建設,實現城鄉基本公共文化服務均等化是打破文化貧困陷阱的關鍵。文章使用大量調查數據對農村公共文化建設進行分析,研究發現:與非貧困農村居民相比,貧困農村居民不積極主動參加精神文化汲取和健康提升的活動,使得農村貧困居民難以擺脫貧困;貧困地區公共文化基礎設施和文化活動提供中,政府既是主要的組織者,又是主要的出資者;村莊文化基礎設施缺乏管護資金;政府出資支持、村集體自行組織的文化活動對村民具有較高的吸引力;文化娛樂類民間組織能在一定程度上解決鄉村公共文化供給不足的問題;互聯網為農村居民提供了更多文化娛樂選擇。基于這些研究,提出促進貧困地區農村公共文化建設的建議。
This paper argues that realizing the equalization of public cultural services between urban areas and rural areas is the key to break the cultural poverty trap. Compared with the non poor residents in rural areas,impoverished rural residents do not actively participate in spiritual cultural and health promotion activities and more willing to take part in the useless social activities. So,the poor can’t get rid of the poverty. In supplying public cultural infrastructure and cultural activities,government is not only the main organizer,but also the key investor. Village collectives do not play an important part in it and the degree of social participation is low. The cultural infrastructure is mainly managed by village cadres and management effect is poor. The cultural activities organized by village collective with the Government funded support,have a relatively high appeal.However,the cultural activities organized entirely by the government are less attractive.Cultural grass-roots organizations in villages can solve the problem of the shortage of rural public culture supply to some extent,but its development lags behind the economic grass-roots organizations.Based on the findings of these studies,this paper suggests some recommendations for promoting the public cultural construction in poor areas.
期刊論文
1.Laderchi, C. R.、Saith, R.、Stewart, F.(2003)。Does It Matter that We Do Not Agree on The Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches。Oxford Development Studies,31(3),243-274。  new window
2.北京大學宗教文化研究院課題組、盧雲峰(2014)。當代中國宗教狀況報告--基於CFPS(2012)調查數據。世界宗教文化,2014(1),11-25+120。  延伸查詢new window
3.張曉山(2016)。農村基層治理結構:現狀、問題與展望。求索,2016(7),4-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.阮榮平、鄭風田、劉力(2010)。公共文化供給的宗教信仰擠出效應檢驗--基於河南農村調查數據。中國農村觀察,2010(6),72-85。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳前恒、魏文慧(2016)。草根組織經歷與政治參與:來自中國村莊選舉的證據。中國農村觀察,2016(1),38-50。  延伸查詢new window
6.Salamon, Lester M.(1994)。The Rise of the Nonprofit Sector。Foreign Affairs,73(4),109-122。  new window
研究報告
1.文化部(20150426)。2015年文化發展統計公報。  延伸查詢new window
2.人力資源和社會保障部(20160530)。2015年度人力資源和社會保障事業發展統計公報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sen, A. K.(1985)。Commodities and Capabilities。North-Holland。  new window
2.Sen, A. K.(1999)。Development as freedom。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Rowntree(1901)。Poverty: A Study of Town Life。London:Macmillan。  new window
4.塞繆爾.亨廷頓、周琪、劉緋、張立平(2009)。文明的衝突與世界秩序的重建。北京:新華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lewis, Oscar(1969)。A Death in the Sánchez Family。New York:Random House。  new window
6.Lewis, Oscar(1959)。Five Families: Mexican Case Studies in the Culture of Poverty。New York:Basic Books。  new window
其他
1.The Committee of European Community(1993)。Interim Report on a Specific Community Action Program to Combat Poverty。  new window
2.加潤國(20150526)。全球信教人口有多少,http://www.mzb.com.cn/html/report/1508393460-1.htm.。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE