:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:現代化視角下鄉村治理的柔性路徑--基於江寧的觀察
書刊名:城市規劃
作者:陳昭
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(12)
頁次:73-81
主題關鍵詞:現代化鄉村治理柔性城鎮化ModernizationRural governanceFlexibleUrbanization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:0
當前鄉村現代化成為中國城鄉規劃治理的重要目標,也是國家權力下沉鄉村、完成現代國家建構的必要步驟。本文試圖提供一個基于歷史經驗的鄉村治理解釋框架,并在此基礎上進一步結合南京江寧案例提出一條鄉村治理可能的新路徑。首先,通過對國家權力主導鄉村治理歷史的簡要回顧,提出鄉村治理與現代化的關系框架,包含"為穩定的治理"和"為發展的治理"兩個階段,試圖以此解釋鄉村治理變遷的內在機制及當前鄉村治理面臨的挑戰。其次,通過對南京江寧鄉村規劃治理的案例研究,本文觀察到以快速響應、項目精準投入和自主實踐引導為特征的新型鄉村治理路徑的形成。再次,基于案例研究,本文歸納出區別于傳統以"現代化要素投入"為特征的剛性鄉村治理的新模式,即以"現代化經驗賦予"為特征的柔性鄉村治理模式。最后,本文探討了這種柔性模式作為未來鄉村治理理想模式的內在合理性、可行性和規劃應對。
Nowadays, rural modernization has become both a vital target of China’s rural planning and governance, and a necessary step for power decentralization to rural areas and completing the modern state construction as well. This paper attempts to provide a preliminary explanatory framework for rural governance based on history and further propose an emerging governance pattern through a case study in Jiangning, Nanjing. Firstly, with a review of historical performance of state power in rural governance, this paper proposes a hypothesis about rural governance-modernization relationship that includes two stages, i.e., "governing for stability" and "governing for development", in order to explain the inherent mechanism of transitional rural governance and the challenge that current rural governance is facing. Then, through a case study of rural planning and governance in Jiangning, the paper identifies an emerging path to rural modernization driven by a unique governance pattern, which is characterized with fast response, accurate project input, and independent experiencesoriented. Thirdly, based on the case study, this paper induces a new rural governance pattern, that is, the flexible pattern, characterized by the creation of modernized context and experiences, which is very different from the conventional way focusing on the devotion of modernized entities known as the inflexible pattern in recent years. As a complement, the paper further discusses the inherent rationality, feasibility and applicability of the flexible governance pattern which makes it a possible ideal model for future rural governance in China.
期刊論文
1.趙世瑜(2005)。分水之爭:公共資源與鄉土社會的權力和象徵--以明清山西汾水流域的若干案例為中心。中國社會科學,2005(2),189-203。  延伸查詢new window
2.李里峰(2014)。群眾運動與鄉村治理--1945-1976年中國基層政治的一個解釋框架。江蘇社會科學,2014(1),218-230。  延伸查詢new window
3.王紅揚(2012)。城鄉統籌規劃理論的科學建構與城市化的中國模式。國際城市規劃,27(4),77-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳昭(20160900)。柔性城鎮化模式--基於鄉村兼業和流動性的猜想。城市規劃,40(9),59-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王紅揚(2012)。村莊環境整治的意義與建構中國特色新型人居環境系統的江蘇實踐。江蘇建設,2012(3),38-56。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄶艶麗、鄭皓昀(2015)。傳統鄉村治理的柔軟與現代鄉村治理的堅硬。現代城市研究,2015(4),8-15。  延伸查詢new window
7.樊綱(1993)。兩種改革成本與兩種改革方式。經濟研究,1993(1),3-15。  延伸查詢new window
8.Arrow, Kenneth J.(1962)。The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing。The Review of Economic Studies,29(3),155-173。  new window
圖書
1.Taylor, N.(1998)。Urban Planning Theory since 1945。London:SAGE。  new window
2.魯西奇(2014)。中國歷史的空間結構。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Giddens, Anthony、田禾、黃平(2000)。現代性的後果。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kuhn, Philip A.、陳兼、陳之宏(2013)。中國現代國家的起源。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
5.費孝通(2007)。鄉土中國。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.安東尼.吉登斯、胡宗澤、趙力濤、王銘銘(1998)。民族-國家與暴力。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.張鳴(2008)。鄉村社會權力和文化結構的變遷。西安:陝西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.張維迎(2010)。市場的邏輯。上海:上海世紀出版集團。  延伸查詢new window
9.梁漱溟(2007)。鄉村建設理論。北京:世紀出版集團。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.秦暉(2005)。傳統中國帝國的鄉村基層控制:漢唐間的鄉村組織。中國鄉村研究。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE