:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會資本對農民環保投資意願的影響分析--來自湖北農村農業廢棄物資源化的實證研究
書刊名:中國人口.資源與環境
作者:顏廷武何可張俊飆
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(1)
頁次:158-164
主題關鍵詞:社會資本農業廢棄物資源化投資意願湖北省Social capitalReuse of agricultural wastesWillingness to investHubei Province
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
我國尚處于轉軌經濟時期,市場體系建設不完善,尤其是在廣大農村地區,正式制度的建設和發展相對滯后,社會資本在農村社會經濟中的作用更加突出。鑒于此,本文基于Putnam的社會資本理論,以農村農業廢棄物資源化為例,基于其"集體行動"與"利他主義"屬性,應用Tobit模型系統分析了3個層面的社會資本的核心要素(信任、互惠規范、公民參與網絡)對農民環境保護投資意愿的影響沖擊。研究結果表明:1農業廢棄物資源化得到了多數農民的認同,68.3%的受訪農民對農業廢棄物資源化具有投資意愿,且意愿投資水平為8.46-12.39元/月;2社會資本變量中對農民環保投資意愿的貢獻度大小排序依次是制度信任>公民參與網絡>人際信任>互惠規范;3人力資本中的文化程度、物質資本中的家庭純收入、控制變量中的是否兼業、是否為村干部對農民環保投資意愿均表現出積極的作用;4要縮小私人投資與社會最優投資之間的差距,實現農業廢棄物資源化利用在經濟效益、環境效益上的統一,需要政府或宏觀經濟管理者在制度安排上向其傾斜:通過強化政策支持或輿論引導提升農村的社會資本水平,增進農民對"信任互助"、"團隊合作"的認知;完善環境保護相關法律法規,做到有法可依、執法必嚴、違法必究,改變民眾對法規持有的"法不責眾"態度;大力發展農村地區的基礎教育,提高農村地區人們的文化教育水平。
China is still in economic transition period,and its market economy is imperfect,and especially in rural areas,the construction of the formal system and development is relatively backward and the role of social capital in rural social economy becomes prominent. Therefore,on the basis of Putnam’s social capital theory,this paper employed Tobit model and systematically analyzed three micro core factors of social capital( institutional trust,norm of reciprocity,and citizen participation in networks) that affect farmers’ willingness of environmental protection investment,by taking farmers in rural areas reusing agricultural wastes as an example. Based on disscussion of control variables of human capital and physical capital factors,we prove that social capital do significantly affect the degree of farmers’ willingness to pay for reusing agricultural waste. Results show that: 1 most of farmers agree with reusing agricultural wastes. About 68. 3% respondents are willing to invest reusing agricultural wastes and they intend to invest 8. 46 to 12. 39 RMB per month. 2 The roles of various dimensions of social capital are different in driving the degree of farmers’ willingness to pay and they can be sorted from high to low as follows: institutional trust > citizen participation in networks > interpersonal trust > norms of reciprocity. 3 Education level( human capital),family net income( physical capital),by-business and village officials( control variable) can enhance the degree of farmers’ willingness to pay for reusing agricultural waste. 4 In order to reduce the gap between private investment and social optimal investment and to realize the unification between the economic and environmental benefits of agricultural waste resource,governments and macroeconomic managers need taking some actions. First,farmers’ perception of mutual trust and teamwork need to be strengthened by policy support and public opinion guide to raise the level of social capital in rural areas.Second,the relevant laws and regulations of environmental protection need to be perfected. To achieve this,we must make sure that there are laws to abide by,and that laws already enacted must be well enforced,and that violation of the law must be investigated and dealt with. Farmers’ opinions of ‘the law does not punish everybody’should be changed. Finally,the basic education needs to be developed in rural areas so as to improve rural people’s education level.
期刊論文
1.Gouldner, A. W.(1960)。The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement。American Sociological Review,25,161-178。  new window
2.何可、張俊飈(2014)。農業廢棄物資源化的生態價值--基於新生代農民與上一代農民支付意願的比較分析。中國農村經濟,24(5),62-73+85。  延伸查詢new window
3.李秋成、周玲強(2014)。社會資本對旅遊者環境友好行為意願的影響。旅遊學刊,29(9),73-82。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳錫文(2002)。環境問題與中國農村發展。管理世界,2002(1),5-8。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bhullar, L.(2013)。Climate Change Adaptation and Water Policy: Lessons From Singapore。Sustainable Development,21(3),152-159。  new window
6.何可、張俊飈(2014)。農民對資源性農業廢棄物循環利用的價值感知及其影響因素。中國人口.資源與環境,2014(10),150-156。  延伸查詢new window
7.Isoda, N.、Rodrigues, R.、Silva, A.(2014)。Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Activated Carbon From Agriculture Waste Utilizing Factorial Design。Powder Technology,23(2),175-181。  new window
8.唐學玉、張海鵬、李世平(2012)。農業面源污染防控的經濟價值:基於安全農產品生產戶視角的支付意願分析。中國農村經濟,2012(3),53-67。  延伸查詢new window
9.何可、張俊飈、張露(2015)。人際信任、制度信任與農民環境治理參與意願:以農業廢棄物資源化為例。管理世界,2015(5),75-88。  延伸查詢new window
10.王覃剛、冀紅梅(2006)。利他行為、社會資本與制度演化。財貿研究,2006(5),10-17。  延伸查詢new window
11.喬旭寧、楊永菊、楊德剛(2012)。渭幹河流域生態系統服務的支付意願及影響因素分析。中國生態農業學報,20(9),1254-1261。  延伸查詢new window
12.Wang, K.、Wu, J.、Wang, R.(2015)。Analysis of Residents' Willingness to Pay to Reduce Air Pollution to Improve Children's Health in Community and Hospital Settings in Shanghai, China。Science of the Total Environment,533(15),283-289。  new window
13.He, J.、Sun, X.、Zhu, X.(2015)。Spatial Disparities of the Willingness of the Residents to Pay for the Wetland Restoration of Taihu Lake and its Integration into Decision Making: A Case Study on Wuxi, China。Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,187(8),492-507。  new window
14.Anderson, C.、Schirmer, J.(2015)。An Empirical Investigation of Social Capital and Networks at Local Scale through Resistance to Lower-Carbon Infrastructure。Society and Natural Resources,28(7),749-765。  new window
15.劉曉峰(2011)。社會資本對中國環境治理績效影響的實證分析。中國人口.資源與環境,21(3),20-24。  延伸查詢new window
16.Kithiia, J.(2015)。Resourceless Victims or Resourceful Collectives: Addressing the Impacts of Climate Change through Social Capital in Fringing Coastal Communities。Ocean and Coastal Management,106(3),110-117。  new window
17.Leonard, R. J.、Pepper, M. D.(2015)。Attitudes to Climate Change and the Actions for Energy Decay of Regular Church-going Christians: The Effects of Religious Persuasions and Social Capital。Social Compass,62(3),326-343。  new window
18.Petzold, J.、Ratter, B. M. W.(2015)。Climate Change Adaptation under a Social Capital Approach: An Analytical Framework for Small Islands。Ocean and Coastal Management,112(8),36-43。  new window
學位論文
1.李六(2010)。社會資本:形成機制與作用機制研究(博士論文)。復旦大學,上海。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Luhmann, N.(1979)。Trust and power。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Coleman, James S.、鄧方(1999)。社會理論的基礎。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Giddens, Anthony、田禾、黃平(2000)。現代性的後果。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅必良(2009)。現代農業發展理論。北京:中國農業出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.安東尼.吉登斯、趙旭東、方文、王銘銘(1998)。現代性與自我認同。三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top