:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:CD-MST初始階段模塊組建方法比較
書刊名:心理學報
作者:高椿雷羅照盛喻曉鋒彭亞風鄭蟬金
作者(外文):Gao, Chun-leiLuo, Zhao-shengYu, Xiao-fengPeng, Ya-fengZheng, Chan-jin
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(8)
頁次:1037-1046
主題關鍵詞:認知診斷評價計算機化多階段測驗具有認知診斷功能的計算機化多階段測驗初始階段模塊組建方法CDAMSTCD-MSTInitial stage module assemble methods
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
具有認知診斷功能的計算機化多階段測驗(CD-MST)是CDA和MST相結合的一種測驗方式。由于CD-MST自適應頻次較少,初始階段模塊組建會影響整個測驗的判準率。借鑒CD-CAT初始項目選取方法,根據CDA和MST自身特點,提出了7種CD-MST初始階段模塊組建方法,分別是隨機法、選題策略法、R*矩陣法、CTTID法、CDI法、CTTIDR*法和CDIR*法。采用模擬研究對不同項目質量下7種方法的判準率進行了比較。研究結果表明,當初始階段結束時,包含R*矩陣的方法判準率顯著高于其他方法,尤其是CTTIDR*法;整個測驗結束時,CTTIDR*法較其他方法仍然有優勢,CDIR*法和R*矩陣法結果較為接近。選題策略法在初始階段結束時判準率較低,甚至低于隨機法,整個測驗結束時,判準率同CDIR*法和R*矩陣法持平。4種項目質量對判準率影響較大,HD-HV題庫下判準率最高,HD-LV次之,LD-HV較差,LD-LV最差。
Cognitive Diagnostic Multistage Testing(CD-MST) is a new testing mode which combines MST with CDA. It has some advantages, such as improving instruction, allowing administers to check the pre-assembled test forms, allowing the examinee to review and revise answers. The initial stage module assemble methods is an important part for CD-MST. It is presented seven initial stage module assemble methods, they are Randommethod, Item Selection method, R* Matrix method, CTTID method, CDI method, CTTIDR* method and CDIR* method. 1) Random method means that select first stage items from item bank randomly, this method does not consider item parameters and attributes. It is easy and fast.2) Item selection method is first to randomly assign a knowledge state to examinee, and then select the initial stage items according to item selection indices(such as PWKL, SHE). 3) R* matrix method is to select initial items from R-matrix. 4) CTTID method means that select high discriminatory items for the first stage. In DINA model, high discriminatory items are the items slipping and guessing parameters smaller.5) CDI method is presented by Henson and Douglas(2005), it’s another item discrimination index, it considers item parameter and attribute.6) Item parameter and R matrix are the important elements which can influence the efficiency of testing, so here we consider discrimination and R matrix simultaneously to select first stage items, CTTIDR* method and 7) CDIR* method are from this consideration. A simulation research was used to verify these methods of CD-MST. CDM was DINA model, the number of examinee was 3000, item bank was 1240, the number of attributes was 5, stage number of CD-MST was 3. PCCR and ACCR were the evaluation indices. The quality of item bank was a contributory factor. The results showed that after the initial stage, under each of the quality of item banks, the PCCR of the methods with R* matrix were higher than others. When the tests were finished, CTTIDR* method was also higher than others, it had obvious advantage. CD-MST is an efficient application of MST in CDA. It is necessary to study many issues of CD-MST, the initial stage module assemble method is one of them. Some of the seven methods we presented here are effectively and exactly. These methods can also extend to CD-CAT.
期刊論文
1.De la Torre, J.、Hong, Y.、Deng, W. L.(2010)。Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model。Journal of Educational Measurement,47(2),227-249。  new window
2.Cheng, Y.(2009)。When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT。Psychometrika,74(4),619-632。  new window
3.王卓然、郭磊、邊玉芳(2014)。認知診斷測驗中的項目功能差異檢測方法比較。心理學報,46(12),1923-1932。  延伸查詢new window
4.丁樹良、汪文義、楊淑群(2011)。認知診斷測驗藍圖的設計。心理科學,34(2),258-265。  延伸查詢new window
5.丁樹良、楊淑群、汪文義(2010)。可達矩陣在認知診斷測驗編制中的重要作用。江西師範大學學報(自然科學版),34(5),490-494。  延伸查詢new window
6.詹沛達、李曉敏、王文中、邊玉芳、王立君(2015)。多維題組效應認知診斷模型。心理學報,47(5),689-701。  延伸查詢new window
7.Templin, J. L.、Henson, R. A.(2006)。Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models。Psychological Methods,11(3),287-305。  new window
8.郭磊、鄭蟬金、邊玉芳(2015)。變長CD-CAT中的曝光控制與終止規則。心理學報,47(1),129-140。  延伸查詢new window
9.Mao, X. Z.、Xin, T.(2013)。The application of the monte carlo approach to cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing with content constraints。Applied Psychological Measurement,37(6),482-496。  new window
10.Henson, R. A.、Douglas, J.(2005)。Test construction for cognitive diagnosis。Applied Psychological Measurement,29(4),262-277。  new window
11.Kaplan, M.、de la Torre, J.、Barrada, J. R.(2015)。New item selection methods for cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,39(3),167-188。  new window
12.Chen, P.、Xin, T.、Wang, C.、Chang, H.-H.(2012)。Online calibration methods for the DINA model with independent attributes in CD-CAT。Psychometrika,77(2),201-222。  new window
13.Belov, D. I.、Armstrong, R. D.(2005)。Monte Carlo test assembly for item pool analysis and extension。Applied Psychological Measurement,29(4),239-261。  new window
14.Breithaupt, K.、Hare, D. R.(2007)。Automated simultaneous assembly of multistage testlets for a high-stakes licensing examination。Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(1),5-20。  new window
15.蔡豔、塗冬波(2015)。屬性多級化的認知診斷模型拓展及其Q矩陣設計。心理學報,47(10),1300-1308。  延伸查詢new window
16.Edwards, M. C.、Flora, D. B.、Thissen, D.(2012)。Multistage computerized adaptive testing with uniform item exposure。Applied Measurement in Education,25(2),118-141。  new window
17.Hambleton, R. K.、Xing, D. H.(2006)。Optimal and non-optimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),221-239。  new window
18.Han, K. T.(2013)。MSTGen: Simulated data generator for multistage testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,37(8),666-668。  new window
19.Jodoin, M. G.、Zenisky, A.、Hambleton, R. K.(2006)。Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams with multiple purposes。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),203-220。  new window
20.Kim, J.、Chung, H.、Dodd, B. G.、Park, R.(2012)。Panel design variations in the multistage test using the mixed-format tests。Educational and Psychological Measurement,72(4),574-588。  new window
21.Kim, S.、Moses, T.、Yoo, H.(2015)。A comparison of IRT proficiency estimation methods under adaptive multistage esting。Journal of Educational Measurement,52(1),70-79。  new window
22.Luecht, R. M.、Nungester, R. J.(1998)。Some practical examples of computeradaptive sequential testing。Journal of Educational Measurement,35(3),229-249。  new window
23.Luecht, R. M.、Brumfield, T.、Breithaupt, K.(2006)。A testlet assembly design for adaptive multistage tests。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),189-202。  new window
24.羅照盛、喻曉鋒、高椿雷、李喻駿、彭亞風、王睿、王鈺彤(2015)。基於屬性掌握概率的認知診斷計算機化自適應測驗選題策略。心理學報,47(5),679-688。  延伸查詢new window
25.Park, R.、Kim, J.、Chung, H.、Dodd, B. G.(2014)。Enhancing pool utilization in constructing the multistage test using mixed-format tests。Applied Psychological Measurement,38(4),268-280。  new window
26.塗冬波、蔡艶、戴海崎(2013)。認知診斷CAT選題策略及初始題選取方法。心理科學,36(2),469-474。  延伸查詢new window
27.Wang, C.、Zheng, C. J.、Chang, H. H.(2014)。An enhanced approach to combine item response theory with cognitive diagnosis in ddaptive testing。Journal of Educational Measurement,51(4),358-380。  new window
28.Wang, S. Y.、Douglas, J.(2015)。Consistency of nonparametric classification in cognitive diagnosis。Psychometrika,80(1),85-100。  new window
29.Xin, T.、Zhang, J. H.(2014)。Local equating of cognitively diagnostic modeled observed scores。Applied Psychological Measurement,39(1),44-61。  new window
30.Yan, D.、Lewis, C.、Von Davier, A. A.(2014)。Overview of computerized multistage tests。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications,3-20。  new window
31.Chang, H.-H.、Ying, Z.(1999)。A-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,23(3),211-222。  new window
32.Luecht, R. M.(1998)。Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics。Applied Psychological Measurement,22(3),224-236。  new window
會議論文
1.Xu, X. L.、Chang, H. H.、Douglas, J.(2003)。A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis。The Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education。Montreal。  new window
學位論文
1.Kim, H.(1993)。Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two -stage testing and computer adaptive testing (Unpublished doctorial dissertation(博士論文)。University of Nebraska, Lincoln。  new window
2.Macken-Ruiz, C. L.(2008)。A comparison of MST and CAT based on the GPCM(博士論文)。University of Texas, Austin。  new window
3.Patsula, L. N.(1999)。A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multistage testing(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts,Amherst。  new window
4.Zenisky, A. L.(2004)。Evaluating the effects of several multistage testing design variables on selected psychometric outcomes for certification and licensure assessment(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts, Amherst。  new window
圖書
1.Rupp, A. A.、Templin, J.、Henson, R. A.(2010)。Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications。New York:Guilford Press。  new window
2.塗冬波、蔡豔、丁樹良(2012)。認知診斷理論、方法與應用。北京:北京師範大學出版集團。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.DiBello, L. V.、Roussos, L. A.、Stout, W.(2007)。Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models。Handbook of statistics, 26: Psychometric。Amsterdam:Elsevier。  new window
2.Von Davier, M.、Cheng, Y.(2014)。Multistage testing using diagnostic models。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications。New York:CRC Press。  new window
3.Zheng, Y.、Wang, C.、Chang H. H.(2014)。Overview of test assembly methods in multistage testing。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications。New York:CRC Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top