資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.143.5.217)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
CD-MST初始階段模塊組建方法比較
書刊名:
心理學報
作者:
高椿雷
/
羅照盛
/
喻曉鋒
/
彭亞風
/
鄭蟬金
作者(外文):
Gao, Chun-lei
/
Luo, Zhao-sheng
/
Yu, Xiao-feng
/
Peng, Ya-feng
/
Zheng, Chan-jin
出版日期:
2016
卷期:
2016(8)
頁次:
1037-1046
主題關鍵詞:
認知診斷評價
;
計算機化多階段測驗
;
具有認知診斷功能的計算機化多階段測驗
;
初始階段模塊組建方法
;
CDA
;
MST
;
CD-MST
;
Initial stage module assemble methods
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:6
具有認知診斷功能的計算機化多階段測驗(CD-MST)是CDA和MST相結合的一種測驗方式。由于CD-MST自適應頻次較少,初始階段模塊組建會影響整個測驗的判準率。借鑒CD-CAT初始項目選取方法,根據CDA和MST自身特點,提出了7種CD-MST初始階段模塊組建方法,分別是隨機法、選題策略法、R*矩陣法、CTTID法、CDI法、CTTIDR*法和CDIR*法。采用模擬研究對不同項目質量下7種方法的判準率進行了比較。研究結果表明,當初始階段結束時,包含R*矩陣的方法判準率顯著高于其他方法,尤其是CTTIDR*法;整個測驗結束時,CTTIDR*法較其他方法仍然有優勢,CDIR*法和R*矩陣法結果較為接近。選題策略法在初始階段結束時判準率較低,甚至低于隨機法,整個測驗結束時,判準率同CDIR*法和R*矩陣法持平。4種項目質量對判準率影響較大,HD-HV題庫下判準率最高,HD-LV次之,LD-HV較差,LD-LV最差。
以文找文
Cognitive Diagnostic Multistage Testing(CD-MST) is a new testing mode which combines MST with CDA. It has some advantages, such as improving instruction, allowing administers to check the pre-assembled test forms, allowing the examinee to review and revise answers. The initial stage module assemble methods is an important part for CD-MST. It is presented seven initial stage module assemble methods, they are Randommethod, Item Selection method, R* Matrix method, CTTID method, CDI method, CTTIDR* method and CDIR* method. 1) Random method means that select first stage items from item bank randomly, this method does not consider item parameters and attributes. It is easy and fast.2) Item selection method is first to randomly assign a knowledge state to examinee, and then select the initial stage items according to item selection indices(such as PWKL, SHE). 3) R* matrix method is to select initial items from R-matrix. 4) CTTID method means that select high discriminatory items for the first stage. In DINA model, high discriminatory items are the items slipping and guessing parameters smaller.5) CDI method is presented by Henson and Douglas(2005), it’s another item discrimination index, it considers item parameter and attribute.6) Item parameter and R matrix are the important elements which can influence the efficiency of testing, so here we consider discrimination and R matrix simultaneously to select first stage items, CTTIDR* method and 7) CDIR* method are from this consideration. A simulation research was used to verify these methods of CD-MST. CDM was DINA model, the number of examinee was 3000, item bank was 1240, the number of attributes was 5, stage number of CD-MST was 3. PCCR and ACCR were the evaluation indices. The quality of item bank was a contributory factor. The results showed that after the initial stage, under each of the quality of item banks, the PCCR of the methods with R* matrix were higher than others. When the tests were finished, CTTIDR* method was also higher than others, it had obvious advantage. CD-MST is an efficient application of MST in CDA. It is necessary to study many issues of CD-MST, the initial stage module assemble method is one of them. Some of the seven methods we presented here are effectively and exactly. These methods can also extend to CD-CAT.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
De la Torre, J.、Hong, Y.、Deng, W. L.(2010)。Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model。Journal of Educational Measurement,47(2),227-249。
2.
Cheng, Y.(2009)。When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT。Psychometrika,74(4),619-632。
3.
王卓然、郭磊、邊玉芳(2014)。認知診斷測驗中的項目功能差異檢測方法比較。心理學報,46(12),1923-1932。
延伸查詢
4.
丁樹良、汪文義、楊淑群(2011)。認知診斷測驗藍圖的設計。心理科學,34(2),258-265。
延伸查詢
5.
丁樹良、楊淑群、汪文義(2010)。可達矩陣在認知診斷測驗編制中的重要作用。江西師範大學學報(自然科學版),34(5),490-494。
延伸查詢
6.
詹沛達、李曉敏、王文中、邊玉芳、王立君(2015)。多維題組效應認知診斷模型。心理學報,47(5),689-701。
延伸查詢
7.
Templin, J. L.、Henson, R. A.(2006)。Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models。Psychological Methods,11(3),287-305。
8.
郭磊、鄭蟬金、邊玉芳(2015)。變長CD-CAT中的曝光控制與終止規則。心理學報,47(1),129-140。
延伸查詢
9.
Mao, X. Z.、Xin, T.(2013)。The application of the monte carlo approach to cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing with content constraints。Applied Psychological Measurement,37(6),482-496。
10.
Henson, R. A.、Douglas, J.(2005)。Test construction for cognitive diagnosis。Applied Psychological Measurement,29(4),262-277。
11.
Kaplan, M.、de la Torre, J.、Barrada, J. R.(2015)。New item selection methods for cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,39(3),167-188。
12.
Chen, P.、Xin, T.、Wang, C.、Chang, H.-H.(2012)。Online calibration methods for the DINA model with independent attributes in CD-CAT。Psychometrika,77(2),201-222。
13.
Belov, D. I.、Armstrong, R. D.(2005)。Monte Carlo test assembly for item pool analysis and extension。Applied Psychological Measurement,29(4),239-261。
14.
Breithaupt, K.、Hare, D. R.(2007)。Automated simultaneous assembly of multistage testlets for a high-stakes licensing examination。Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(1),5-20。
15.
蔡豔、塗冬波(2015)。屬性多級化的認知診斷模型拓展及其Q矩陣設計。心理學報,47(10),1300-1308。
延伸查詢
16.
Edwards, M. C.、Flora, D. B.、Thissen, D.(2012)。Multistage computerized adaptive testing with uniform item exposure。Applied Measurement in Education,25(2),118-141。
17.
Hambleton, R. K.、Xing, D. H.(2006)。Optimal and non-optimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),221-239。
18.
Han, K. T.(2013)。MSTGen: Simulated data generator for multistage testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,37(8),666-668。
19.
Jodoin, M. G.、Zenisky, A.、Hambleton, R. K.(2006)。Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams with multiple purposes。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),203-220。
20.
Kim, J.、Chung, H.、Dodd, B. G.、Park, R.(2012)。Panel design variations in the multistage test using the mixed-format tests。Educational and Psychological Measurement,72(4),574-588。
21.
Kim, S.、Moses, T.、Yoo, H.(2015)。A comparison of IRT proficiency estimation methods under adaptive multistage esting。Journal of Educational Measurement,52(1),70-79。
22.
Luecht, R. M.、Nungester, R. J.(1998)。Some practical examples of computeradaptive sequential testing。Journal of Educational Measurement,35(3),229-249。
23.
Luecht, R. M.、Brumfield, T.、Breithaupt, K.(2006)。A testlet assembly design for adaptive multistage tests。Applied Measurement in Education,19(3),189-202。
24.
羅照盛、喻曉鋒、高椿雷、李喻駿、彭亞風、王睿、王鈺彤(2015)。基於屬性掌握概率的認知診斷計算機化自適應測驗選題策略。心理學報,47(5),679-688。
延伸查詢
25.
Park, R.、Kim, J.、Chung, H.、Dodd, B. G.(2014)。Enhancing pool utilization in constructing the multistage test using mixed-format tests。Applied Psychological Measurement,38(4),268-280。
26.
塗冬波、蔡艶、戴海崎(2013)。認知診斷CAT選題策略及初始題選取方法。心理科學,36(2),469-474。
延伸查詢
27.
Wang, C.、Zheng, C. J.、Chang, H. H.(2014)。An enhanced approach to combine item response theory with cognitive diagnosis in ddaptive testing。Journal of Educational Measurement,51(4),358-380。
28.
Wang, S. Y.、Douglas, J.(2015)。Consistency of nonparametric classification in cognitive diagnosis。Psychometrika,80(1),85-100。
29.
Xin, T.、Zhang, J. H.(2014)。Local equating of cognitively diagnostic modeled observed scores。Applied Psychological Measurement,39(1),44-61。
30.
Yan, D.、Lewis, C.、Von Davier, A. A.(2014)。Overview of computerized multistage tests。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications,3-20。
31.
Chang, H.-H.、Ying, Z.(1999)。A-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing。Applied Psychological Measurement,23(3),211-222。
32.
Luecht, R. M.(1998)。Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics。Applied Psychological Measurement,22(3),224-236。
會議論文
1.
Xu, X. L.、Chang, H. H.、Douglas, J.(2003)。A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis。The Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education。Montreal。
學位論文
1.
Kim, H.(1993)。Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two -stage testing and computer adaptive testing (Unpublished doctorial dissertation(博士論文)。University of Nebraska, Lincoln。
2.
Macken-Ruiz, C. L.(2008)。A comparison of MST and CAT based on the GPCM(博士論文)。University of Texas, Austin。
3.
Patsula, L. N.(1999)。A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multistage testing(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts,Amherst。
4.
Zenisky, A. L.(2004)。Evaluating the effects of several multistage testing design variables on selected psychometric outcomes for certification and licensure assessment(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts, Amherst。
圖書
1.
Rupp, A. A.、Templin, J.、Henson, R. A.(2010)。Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications。New York:Guilford Press。
2.
塗冬波、蔡豔、丁樹良(2012)。認知診斷理論、方法與應用。北京:北京師範大學出版集團。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
DiBello, L. V.、Roussos, L. A.、Stout, W.(2007)。Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models。Handbook of statistics, 26: Psychometric。Amsterdam:Elsevier。
2.
Von Davier, M.、Cheng, Y.(2014)。Multistage testing using diagnostic models。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications。New York:CRC Press。
3.
Zheng, Y.、Wang, C.、Chang H. H.(2014)。Overview of test assembly methods in multistage testing。Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications。New York:CRC Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
心理距離對基線比例忽略的影響
2.
Linda問題的表象-命題雙表徵解釋視角探究
3.
反向對抗邏輯範式的創立與證實--人工語法PDP對抗邏輯的改進
4.
1~6秒時距認知分段性特徵
5.
中文閱讀中的字詞激活模式:來自提示詞邊界延時效應的證據
6.
不連續虛擬現實空間中的再定向
7.
人際距離影響疼痛共情:朋友啟動效應
8.
小學一年級數感不良兒童的篩查與動態干預
9.
不相關言語對視覺覺察的影響
10.
中-西方音樂對情緒的誘發效應
11.
人際關係對社會責任感的影響
12.
中學生學業羞愧:測量、生理喚醒及其與學業成績的關係
13.
中國象棋經驗棋手與新手的知覺差異:來自眼動的證據
14.
大學生自傷行為的強化敏感性基礎
15.
SPT效應的自動突顯機制:來自輸出監測的證據
QR Code