林栗（1120-1190）以《周易經傳集解》傳世，其易學觀具有漢宋兼採的特色。典型而特殊的象數易學主張，乃至孔門儒學的義理思想，為其易學的核心。林栗與朱熹（1130-1200）除了在官場上的齟齬外，兩者的易學認識，也存在諸多的歧異。本文探討林栗易學銷沉之原由，以林栗易學內容作為主體視域，並對應比較與朱熹觀點上的殊異；首先從其個人性格特質對其仕途與學術影響作開展，進一步選擇其與朱熹可以具體參照的重要易學觀點進行分析，包括經傳相合的詮《易》進路、別卦序列的變化體系、太極生次的用象主張等議題，一方面體現林栗相關之易學思想，另一方面述明與朱熹的歧異所在；理解林栗有關觀點的實質內涵，廓清彼此之爭議，可以對其易學有更具體的認識，免除人云亦云的可能誣詆，給予更為公平的對待與評價。

Lin Li is famous for his important work Zhouyi Jingzhuan Jijie. The core of his Yi theories lies in his distinctive thoughts on Xiang-Shu Yixue and on Yili of Confucianism. He and Zhu Xi have conflicting views not only on politics but also in their understanding of Yi. The present study mainly focuses on Lin's Yi theories, and makes a comparison between Lin's and Zhu's thoughts. First, there will be an analysis on how Lin's personality influences his academic development and his career as an official in the Song Dynasty. Then Lin's and Zhu's theories will be compared and contrasted, which include the issues of explaining Yi by Jingzhuan xianghe, the variation order of the 64 Gua, and the use of Xiang in terms of Taiji producing Bagua. The study aims to provide a close examination on Lin's Yi theory and show how it is different from Zhu's, in the hope that Lin’s Yi theory can be fairly recognized.