本研究旨在探討新編製的「新編中華智力量表」與新修訂的「比西智力量
表（第五次修訂版）」，應用於鑑定學習障礙兒童的可行模式與其結果之
分析。本研究先以3966名國小五年級學童為母群體，施以「國小系列學業
性向測驗」與「國民小學高年級成就測驗（五年級國語、數學科）」測驗
，應用迴歸分析法篩選出低成就學生，再經級任教師以「學習行為檢核表
」檢核學習行為，對照常模凡達學習障礙之標準者，予以認定為學習障礙
兒童並抽選100 位為研究樣本，另在低成就學生中選出100 位為低成就組
樣本，及利用兩套智力量表的標準化常模樣本之國小五年級組樣本100 位
為常模組樣本。對學習障礙組與低成就組兒童各施以兩套個別智力量表，
所得資料採積差相關、主成份分析、ｔ檢定、區別分析、ANOVA 、MANOVA
等方法分析。主要研究結果如下：一、學習障礙兒童的出現率是3.15%（
男生是3.73%、女生是2.52%）。二、以Lawson和Inglis建立WISC-R的「學
習障礙指數」之方法，亦能建立兩套個別智力量表的「學習障礙指數」；
三組兒童的學習障礙指數平均數，有顯著差異；而男女學習障礙兒童的學
習障礙指數平均數並無顯著差異。三、學習障礙兒童的語文能力顯著低於
低成就與一般兒童，而在非語文能力方面無顯著差異；學習障礙兒童的非
語文能力顯著高於語文能力，且分測驗間的得分差異很大。四、以兩套個
別智力量表的各種智力變項均能有效區別學習障礙兒童與一般兒童。五、
學習障礙兒童在「比西智力量表（第五次修訂版）」的得分稍高　　於「
新編中華智力量表」的得分，但一致性很高。

The subjects were 300 fifth grade students in primary school,
and were composed of 100 LD, 100 UA and 100 normal children
respectively. The Scholastic Aptitude Test for Primary School
Student(SAT), The Achievement Test for Fifth Grade Student(
Chinese and Mathematics), The Learning Behavior Checklist, The
New Jong-Hwa Intelligence Scale and The Stanford -Binet
Intelligence Scale: Fifth Edition(in Taiwan) were administered
to obtain relative information. The data obtained were analyzed
by the Pearson product-moment correlation, principal component
analysis, t-test, the discriminant analysis , ANOVA, and
MANOVA. The major findings of this study were as follows: 1.The
prevalence of learning disabilities is 3.15%(3.73% male, 2.52%
female). 2.The method of constructing LDI could be used in the
two individual intelligence scales, and costructed two pieces
of LDI norm tables. The mean LDI is significat difference among
LD, UA and normal group, and no significant difference between
boy and girl LD. 3.Students of LD group showed significantly
lower than students of UA and normal group in verbal ability,
but no significant difference in nonverbal ability. For LD
group, nonverbal ability is significantly higher than verbal
ability, and showed greater intra-individual differences on
scores of all subtests of both individual intelligence scales.
4.The various intelligence variables of both intelligence
scales could distinguish the LD and normal group effectively.
5.Pearson correlation coeficients showed a higher
correspondence between The New Jong-Hwa Intelligence Scale Full-
Scale IQ and The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Composite
score (r=.861) , and the later(M=91.04) higher the former(
M=88.52), but no significant difference.