產學關係持續性之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	產學關係持續性之研究
作者：	李聖賢
作者(外文)：	Sheng-Hsien Lee
校院名稱：	國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱：	國際企業學系
指導教授：	佘日新駱世民
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2009
主題關鍵詞：	產學合作；持續性；關係承諾；國家創新體系；University-Industry Relationship；Continuity；Relationship Commitment；National System of Innovation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:35

近年來，大學被視為科技知識的重要來源，各國政府紛紛將提升產學合作作為科技政策的重要策略思維，藉以提升國家創新能力。大學的發展策略思維也逐漸將重點放在如何創造及商業化其研究成果。然而，近年來台灣的產學合作績效逐年下滑，產業界對於大學研究資源與成果的投資有減少的趨勢，本研究目的在於了解台灣的產學合作政策效果，以及探討產學關係持續性的影響因素。
本研究針對產業進行問卷調查，採取二階段研究策略。第一階段的探索性調查研究結果如下：(一)廠商視產學關係的穩定性為產學合作績效的重要指標；(二)關係性變數(如信任及承諾)及經濟性變數(如產出結果及商業化程度)同時影響廠商對產學合作關係的知覺經驗；(三)產學合作政策對廠商參與產學合作的意願沒有顯著影響，經費補助及中介組織等產學合作政策無法有效提升廠商參與產學合作之意願。根據第一階段研究發現及過去文獻的探討，本研究提出四項影響產學關係持續性之因素：溝通、信任、關係承諾及知覺價值，並據此發展出一個整合性的產學關係持續性模式。第二階段調查研究發現，關係承諾顯著影響產學關係持續性，此點與過去關係行銷理論一致。本研究進一步採取結構方程模式分析，檢定模式配適度及路徑係數，研究發現溝通、信任、關係承諾、知覺價值及持續性有顯著的正向關係。其中，本研究發現知覺價值在關係承諾及持續性的影響關係中，具有顯著的中介效果，此發現迥異於過去關係行銷理論。質言之，產學合作雖然可以透過政策干預而形成，然而著眼於長期關係利益的產生，產學關係必須考慮其經濟性及社會性交易的特性。另外，產學關係必須考慮知識的信任財特性，如同商業交易關係，產學關係中的知識交易雖然也強調經濟性報酬，但是對產學合作的知識接受者而言，知識交易通常無法在交易當時或事後衡量其績效，因此關係持續性對於產學關係績效十分重要，而這種持續性關係乃建立在顧客忠誠度之基礎上。本研究所提出之產學關係持續性模式針對產學關係績效之文獻提出一個新的理論架構，不僅可作為產學合作實務上之管理指標，亦對國家創新體系提出了微觀的理論基礎。

以文找文

University-industry relationship (UIR) has become a central concern for policy makers to enhance the national system of innovation (NSI), as universities are important sources of new scientific knowledge. A growing number of universities are redefining their objectives in terms of identifying, creating and commercializing their research output. However, the decreasing investment of UIR by the industry in Taiwan prompts us to think: How effective are the policy measures? What determines the relationship continuity?
This study adopted a two-stage research strategy. In the phase-one study, several findings emerged. First, the stability of university-industry relationship was identified as a critical dimension of the relationship performance. Second, this study finds that relational factors (i.e. trust and commitment) and economic factors (i.e. delivery of outcomes and commercial concerns) perceived by the firms were relevant variables affecting the perception of UIR experiences. Third, the result shows that the impact of UIR promotion policy was limited. Financial incentives and intermediary organizations alone were not effective in enhancing firms’ expectation of future cooperation with universities. In the phase-two study, an integrated UIR continuity model was developed to investigate what determined the continuity of university-industry relationship. The findings confirmed that UIR continuity was enhanced by relationship commitment, consistent with the relationship marketing scheme that conceptually guided this study. The SEM analysis offered support for the statistically significant relationships between communication, trust, relationship commitment, perceived value and continuity. However, the effects of perceived value as a critical mediating construct between relationship commitment and continuity differ from what has been suggested in previous studies. It should be noted that the Academia-to-Business (A2B) relationships may be formed through government intervention programs. However, for the long-term benefits to be materialized, the nature of credence service in the relational exchange should be prudently recognized. Although the importance of economic returns from UIR is not less stressed than in Business-to-Business (B2B) relationships, knowledge (credence service) exchange in the university-industry relationship is often difficult for customers to evaluate even after purchase and use. The sustaining relationships are critical in bringing about relationship performance and based on the cultivation of customer loyalty. Therefore, the proposed UIR continuity model may serve as a guiding post for both universities and firms wishing to reap the long-term benefits of UIR. The findings of this study contribute to the literatures of UIR performance as well as provide a micro foundation for enhancing the effectiveness of NSI.

以文找文

Achrol, R., 1991. Evolution of the marketing organization: new forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing 55, 77-93.
Akerlof, G.A., 1970. The market for lemons: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488-500.
Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., 2000. Foundations of the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Total Quality Management 11, S869-S882.
Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., Lehmann, D.R., 1994. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing 58, 53-66.
Anderson, E., Weitz, B., 1989. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science 8(4), 310-323.
Anderson, E., Weitz, B., 1992. The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 18-34.

Anderson, J.C., Narus, J.A., 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing 54, 42-58.
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1982. Some methods of respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 453–460.
Andrews, F.M., 1984. Construct validity and error components of survey measures. Public Opinion Quarterly 48, 409-442.
Anne, M., Lars, G., Kai, K., 2000. The drivers of customer satisfaction and loyalty: cross-industry findings from Demark. Total Quality Management 11, S544-S553.
Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S., 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 396-402.
Arndt, J., 1979. Toward a concept of domesticated markets. Journal of Marketing 43, 69-75.
Assael, H., 1987. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action. 3rd ed. PWS-Kent, Boston.
Azagra-Caro, J.M., Archontakis, F., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., Fernandez-de-Lucio, I., 2006. Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy 35, 37-55.
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 16(1), 74–94.
Barney, J.B., 1996. The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science 7(5), 469-469.
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182.
Becker, H.S., 1960. Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology 66, 32-42.
Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A., 1991. Marketing Services. The Free Press, New York.
Blau, P.M., 1964. Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Bluedorn, A.C., 1982. The theories of turnover: causes, effects, and meaning. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Samuel B. Bacharach, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 75-128.
Bolino, M.C., Turnley W.H., Bloodgood, J.M. 2002. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy Management Review 27, 505-522.
Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Bougrain, F., Haudeville, B., 2002. Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy 31, 735-747.
BusinessWeek, 2005a. Why Taiwan Matters. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_20/b3933011.htm.

BusinessWeek, 2005b. Slideshow: Taiwan's Tech Clout. http://images.businessweek.com/ss/05/05/taiwanindustry/index_01.htm.

Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56, 81–105.
Caswell, C., 1998. Social science policy: challenge, interactions, principals and agents. Science and Public Policy 25, 286-296.
Chang, S.F., 2007. Using academic capacity to support industrial innovation – the case of machine tools industry. Taiwan Economic Research Monthly 30(2), 56-63.
Chao, K.C., 2006. A study of key success factors regarding industry-academia cooperation. Unpublished master dissertation, National Changhua University of Education.
Chatterton, P., Goddard, J.B., 2001. The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. In: Zimmermann, F.M., Janschitz, S. (Eds.), Regional Policies in Europe. Key Opportunities for Regions in the 21st Century. Institute of Geography and Regional Science, Graz.
Chen, H.C.K., 1996. Direction, magnitude and implications of non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society 38, 267-276.
Chen, S.H., Chang, Y.J., Liu, M.J., 2004. An international perspective on the university-industry relationships in Taiwan. Sci-Tech Policy Review SR9303, 177-193.
Chi, C.H., 2003. The current status and reform on the operational mechanism for industrial-academic cooperation. Unpublished master dissertation, National Chi Nan University.
Chiu, P.Y., 2004. A study on the performance of cooperative research between industry and university. Unpublished master dissertation, National Chung Hsing University.
Ciavolino, E., Dahlgaard, J.J., 2007. ECSI – Customer satisfaction modeling and analysis: A case study. Total Quality Management 18, 545-554.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128-152.
Coleman, J.S., 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cook, K.S., Emerson, R.M., 1978. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 43, 721-739.
Crosby, L.A., Stephens, N., 1987. Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction, retention, and prices in the life insurance industry. Journal of Marketing Research 24, 404-411.
David, P., Mowery, D.C., Steinmueller, E.W., 1994. Analyzing the economic payoffs from basic research. In: Mowery, D. (Ed.), Science and Technology Policies in Interdependent Economies. Kluwer, Boston, pp.57-78.
David, P., Foray, D., 1995. Assessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI Review 16, 13-68.
Dasgupta, P., David, P., 1994. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23, 487-521.
Dodgson, M., Bessant, J., 1996. Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach. International Thomson Business Press, London.
Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P.,Mullen, M.R., 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review 23, 601-620.

Dwyer, F., Schurr, P., Oh, S., 1987. Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 51, 11-27.
Etzkowitz, H., 1994. Academic-industry relations: A sociological paradigm for economic development. In: Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., (Eds.), Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 1996. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23, 279-286.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., (Eds.), 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Etzkowitz, H., 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27(8), 823-833.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29, 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., 2000. Tech transfer, incubators probed at Triple Helix III. Research Technology Management. 4-5.
Etzkowitz, H., 2002. Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the Triple Helix Era. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 1(1), 7-20.
Etzkowitz, H., 2003. Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relation. Social Science Information 42, 293-338.
Eun, J.-H., Lee, K., Wu, G., 2006. Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy 35, 1329-1346.
Faulkner, W., Senker, J., 1995. Knowledge Frontiers. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading MA.
Feldman, M., Gertler, M., Wolfe, D., 2006. University technology transfer and national systems of innovation: Introduction to the special issue of Industry and Innovation. Industry and Innovation 13, 359-370.
Fontana, R., Guena, A., Matt, M., 2006. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy 35, 309-323
Fornell, C., 1992. A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing 56, 6-21.
Fornell, C., Yi, Y., 1992. Assumption of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling. Sociological Methods and Research.
Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J., Bryant, B.E., 1996. The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing 60, 7-18.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(February), 39–50.
Frazier, G.L., 1983. Inter-organizational exchange behavior in marketing channels: a broadened perspective. Journal of Marketing 47, 68-78.
Friedman, J., Silberman, J., 2003. University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1), 17-30.
Freeman, C., 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
Garbarino, E., Johnson, M.S., 1999. The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing 63, 70-87.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scoot, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage Publications.
Godin, B., Gingras, Y., 2000. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29, 273-278.
Government Information Office, 2008. Yearbook 2008. http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/ch9.html
Groenewegen, J., Van der Steen, M., 2006. The evolution of national innovation systems. Journal of Economic XL, 277-285.
Grant, R.M., 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109-122.
Gundlach, G.T., Achrol, R.S., Mentzer, J.T., 1995. The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing 59, 78-92.
Hagedoorn, J., 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14, 371-385.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W.C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (5th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
Harrigan, K.R., 1985. Strategies for Joint Ventures. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Hatcher, L., 1998. A Step-by step Approach to Using the SAS system for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd, SAS Institute Inc.
Hayashi, T., 2003. Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes. Research Policy 32, 1421-1442.
Heide, J.B., John, G., 1990. Alliances in industrial purchasing: the determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research 27, 24-36.
Howells, J., 1997. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, 715-728.
Hu, W.T., 2007. A study on key factors affecting the performance of industry -university cooperation. Unpublished master dissertation, Da Yeh University.
Huang, F.M., 2006. Theory and practice of structural equation modeling. 4 eds. Wun-Nan Book Inc.
Hung, D.S., 2005. University-industry relationships in Taiwan. 2006 Taiwan-Japan Science and Technology Forum.
Hunt, S.D., Nevin, J.R., 1974. Power in a channel of distribution: sources and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research 11, 186-193
Hunt, S., 1997. Competing through relationships: Grounding relationship marketing in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Marketing Management 13, 431-445
International Monetary Fund, 2008. World Economic Outlook. IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/02/weodata/groups.htm#ae
Inzelt, A., 2004. The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition. Research Policy 33, 975-995.
Izushi, H., 2003. Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs. Research Policy 32, 771-788.

Joreskog, K.G., Sorbom, D., 1993. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kassarjian, H., 1977. Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 4, 8-18.
Kline, R.B., 1998. Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.
Kelly, H., Michela, J., 1980. Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology 31, 457-501.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N., 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal 19, 193-200.
Kogut, B., 1988. Joint Ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9, 319-332.
Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3, 383-397.
Kodoma, T., 2008. The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages – An empirical study of TAMA in Japan. Research Policy 37, 1224-1240.
Kodoma, F., Yusuf, S., Nabeshima, K., 2008. Introduction to special section on university–industry linkages: The significance of tacit knowledge and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy 37, 1165-1166.

Kotabe, M., Sahay, A., Aulakh, P.S., 1996. Emerging Role of Technology Licensing in the Development of Global Product Strategy: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 60, 73-88.

Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., Achrol, R., 1992. Assessing reseller performance from the perspective of the supplier. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 238-253.
Lages, L.F., Lancastre, A., Lages, C., 2008. The B2B-RELPERF scale and scorecard: Bringing relationship marketing theory into business-to-business practice. Industrial Marketing Management 37, 686-697.
Lan, P.C., 2003. A Study on the motivations and cooperative methods of industry-university cooperation in global logistics management for High-Tech and logistics Industries. Unpublished master dissertation, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology.

Lars, G, Anne, M, Kai, K., 2000. The relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: cross-industry differences. Total Quality Management 11, S509-S514.
Leydesdorff, L., and Meyer, M., 2006. Triple Helix indicator of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy 35, 1441-1449.
Leydesdorff, L., Fritsch, M., 2006. Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy 35, 1538-1553.
Lichtenthaler, U., Ernst, H., 2007. Developing reputation to overcome the imperfections in the markets for knowledge. Research Policy 36, 37-55.

Lin, H.W., 2008. A study on the university innovation and university-government-industry relationship. Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Lin, W.Y., 2006. Factors affecting the performance of technology transfer. Unpublished master dissertation, National Chengchi University.
Lundvall, B.-A., 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London.
Lundvall, B.-A., 1992. Introduction. In: Lundvall, B.-A. (Eds.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London, pp.1-19.
Lundvall, B.-A., 2007. National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation 14, 95-119.
Lundvall, B.-A., Borras, S., 2005. Science, technology, innovation and knowledge policy. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R.R., (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Norfolk.
Macneil, I., 1980. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Mansfield, E., 1995. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics & Statistics 77, 55-65

McDonald, G.W., 1981. Structural exchange and marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family (November), 825-839.
McEvily, B., Zaheer, A., 1999. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20, 1133-1156.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27, 835-851.
Meyer, J.P. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review 1, 61-89.
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., Deshpande, R., 1992. Relationships between providers and users of marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 314-329.
Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., Zaltman, G., 1993. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing 57, 81-101.
Mohr, J.J., Fisher, R.J. and Nevin, J.R., 1996. Collaborative communication in inter-firm relationships: moderating effects of integration and control. Journal of Marketing 60, 103-115.
Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D., 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, 20-38.
Motohashi, K., 2005. University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy 34, 583-594.
Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., 1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some empirical studies. Research Policy 8, 102-153
Mowery, D., Oxley, J., Silverman, B., 1998. Technological overlap and inter-firm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy 27, 507-523.
Mueller, P., 2006. Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy 35, 1499-1508.
Na, L.J., Ofori, G., Park, M., 2006. Stimulating construction innovation in Singapore through the national system of innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132, 1069-1082.
National Science Council of Executive Yuan, 2008. Indicators of Science and Technology.
Ni, C.H., 2007. Obstacles of university-industry cooperation and the solutions. Taiwan Economic Research Monthly 30(2), 45-55.
Oliver, R.L., 1993. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 20, 418-430.

Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1994. National innovation systems: why they important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3, 77-95.
Pelikan, J., 1992. The Idea of the University: A Re-examination. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 1978. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row, Publishers, NY.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J-Y, Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the
Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 879-903.
Pruitt, D.G., 1981. Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, New York.
Razak, A.A., Saad, M., 2007. The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6, 211-225.
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A.J. Ganesan, S., and Moorman, C., 2008. Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and
Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research XLV, 261-279.
Roberts, K., Varki, S., Brodie, R., 2003. Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing 37(1/2), 169-196.
Roijakkers, N., Hagedoorn, J., van Kranenburg, H., 2005. Dual market structures and the likelihood of repeated ties – evidence from pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy 34, 235-245.
Sutz, J., 2000. The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy 29, 279-290.
Schurr, P., Ozanne, J.L., 1985. Influences on exchange processes: buyers’ perceptions of a seller’s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research 11, 939-953.
Schmoch, U., 2007. Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull. Research Policy 36, 1000-1015.
Shane, S., 2004. Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing 19, 127-151.
Sharma, M., Kumar, U., Lalande, L., 2006. Role of university technology transfer offices in university technology commercialization: case study of the Carleton University Foundry Program. Journal of Services Research 6, Special Issue.
Shamdasani, P.N., Sheth, J.N., 1995. An experimental approach to investigating satisfaction and continuity in marketing alliances. European Journal of Marketing 29(4), 6-23.
Science and Technology Advisory Group of Executive Yuan, 2007. Value Added Program for University-industry Relationships.
Science and Technology Advisory Group of Executive Yuan, 2006. Value Added Program for University-industry Relationships.
Science Park Administration, National Science Council, 2009. Profile of Science Park. http://www.sipa.gov.tw/index.jsp
Shoji, Tetsuo, 2006. Corporation and Governance of Universities, University-Industry Relationship and IP Strategy. 2006 Taiwan-Japan Science and Technology Forum, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Spekman, R., 1988. Strategic supplier selection: towards an understanding of long-term buyer-seller relationships. Business Horizons 31, 24-36.
Stem, L.W., Reve, T., 1980. Distribution channels as political economies: a framework for comparative analysis. Journal of Marketing 44, 52-64.
Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, 2006a. Industrial technology competitiveness and university-industry interactions in Taiwan: Innovation system and industrial competition. Commissioned research project by Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, 2006b. Industrial technology competitiveness and university-industry interactions in Taiwan: A study on the bridging of universities and the industry. Commissioned research project by Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Thorelli, H.B., 1986. Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal 7, 37-51.
Ullman, J.B., Bentler, P.M., 2004. “Structural Equation Modeling,” in Handbook of Data Analysis, Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman, eds., London: Sage Publications, 431-458.
Ulrich, D., Barney, J.B., 1984. Perspectives in organizations: resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review 9(3), 471-481.
Uzzi, B., 1996. The sources of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61, 674-698.
Walter, J., Lechner, C., Kellermanns, F.W., 2007. Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: private versus collective benefits of social capital. Journal of Business Research 60, 698-710.
Webster, F.W., 1991. Industrial Marketing Strategy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis of Antitrust Implications. The Free Press, New York.
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press, New York.
Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E., 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management 17, 601-617
Wu, F.S., Lee, C.W., 2004. A study on the university-industry cooperation in Taiwan. Sci-Tech Policy Review SR9309, 705-718.
Yeh, S.J., 2005. An analysis of industry-university collaboration capability. Unpublished master dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Zeithmal, V.A., Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A., 1996. The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing 60, 31-46.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	以創新投入與人才演化之觀點解析臺灣工具機產業創新氛圍的形塑
2.	我國地方政府創新治理研究初探

1.	私立大學的制度邏輯與社會資本對產學合作之影響

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	產學合作實習方案之學生、學校及實習單位焦點議題之個案研究
2.	日本產學合作政策中大學之角色與定位研究－以技術先進首都圈(TechnologyAdvancedMetropolitanArea,TAMA)產業聚集為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫