|
1.Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D., (2007). Constructing mystery: empirical
matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4),1265-1281.
2.Aragón-Correa, J.A. (1998, Oct.). Research notes: strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5):556-567.
3.Argandoña, A. (1998, Jul.). The stakeholder theory and the common good.
Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10): 1093-1102.
4.Aras, G., Crowther, D., 2009. Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity?Journal of Business Ethics. 87, 279-288.
5.Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Swarts J., Thomas, D.A., 1989. An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses. In: Chan, J.L., Patton, J.M. (Eds.), Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting. JAI Press, Connecticut 5, pp. 125-163.
6.Barla, P. (2007), ''ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in
Quebec''s pulp and paper industry , Jounal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 291-306.
7.Barnett, L. Michael (2007), Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32(3),794-816.
8.Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate
sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197-218.
9.Bernroider, E., Stix, V., 2005. A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making. Computers & Operations Research. 34(9), 2637-2647.
10.Bosetti, V., Locatelli, G. (2006), A data envelopment analysis approach to the
assessment of natural parks, economic efficiency and sustainability. The case of Italian national park'', Sustainable Development, 14, 277-286.
11.Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
12.Brammer, S. & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy- an
empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61: 29-44.
13.Buchholtz, A.K., Amason, A.C. & Rutherford, M.A. (1999, Jun.). Beyond resources:the mediating of top management discretion and values on corporate
philanthropy. Business and Society, 38(2): 167-187.
14.Caves, D. W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. (1982a), The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity, Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414.
15.Caves, D. W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E.(1982b), Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers, The Economic Journal, 92(365),73-86.
16.Carroll, A. (1979, Oct.). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate
performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(000004): 497-505.
17.Cerin, P., Dobers, P., 2001. What does the performance of the Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index tell us? Eco-Management and Auditing, 8(3), 123-133.
18.Chand, M. (2006), The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: industry type as a boundary condition, The Business Review, Cambridge, 5(1),240-245.
19.Chang, D.S., Kuo, L.C. (2008), The effects of on firm''s financial performance--an empirical approach, Sustainable Development,16(6),365-380.
20.Charnes A., C. W. W., Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6),429-444.
21Christmann, P. (2000), Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
22.Chen, Y., Ali, A.I. (2003), DEA Malmquist productivity measure: new insights with an application to computer industry, European Journal of Operational Research, 159(1),239-249.
23.Chen, K.H. & Metcalf, R.W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control
record and financial indicators revisited and further comment. The Accounting
Review, 55(1):168-177.
24.Christmann, P. (2000, Aug.). Effects of “best practices” of environmental
management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Academy of
Management Journal, 43(4): 663-680.
25.Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995), A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management, 20(1), 92-117.
26.Clarkson, M.B.E. (1988). Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-86. In L.E.Preston (Ed), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 10,
241-265. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
27.Clarke, T. (Summer 2001). Balancing the triple bottom line: financial, social and
environmental performance. Journal of General Management, 26(4): 16-27.
28.Cochran, P. L., Wood R.A. (1984), Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
29.Cooper, W. W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers:Norwell.
30.Cottrill, M.T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 723-729..
31.Corbett, C.J. & Wassenhove, L.N.V. (Fall 1993). The green fee: internalizing and
operationalizing environmental issues. California Management Review, 36(1):
116-135.
32.Daily, B.F. & Huang, S.C.(2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to
human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management, 21(12):1539-1552.
33.Desrochers, P. (2002), Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm
recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5), 1031-1057.
34.de Burgos Jiménez, J. & Lorente, J.J.C. (2001). Environmental performance as an operations objective. International Journal of Operations & Production
management, 21. (12): 1553-1572.
35.de Geus, A. (1997, Mar.-Apr.). The living company. Harvard Business Review,
75(2):51-59.
36.Ding, L., Velicer, W.F., & Harlow, L.L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods,
number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation
modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2): 119-143.
37.Diltz, D.J. (1995). The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied
Financial Economics, 5(2): 69-77.
38.Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. SAM’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment for the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes 2004.
39.Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., Benn, S., (2003), Organizational change for corporate sustainability, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and N.Y.
40.Dyckhoff, H., Allen K. (2001), Measuring ecological efficiency with data
envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 132,312-325.
41.Elkington, J. (Winter 1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win
business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review,
36(2): 90-100.
42.Elkington, J. (1999, Mar.). Triple bottom-line reporting: looking for balance.
Australian CPA, 69(2): 18-21
43.Färe , R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., Roos, P. (1992), Productivity change in
Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A nonparametric malmquist approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1), 85-102.
44.Figge, F., Hahn, T. (2005), The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of
sustainable value by companies, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),47-58.
45.Fineman, S., Clarke, K. (1996), Green stakeholders: industry interpretations and response, Journal of Management Studies, 33(6),715-730.
46.Fisher, D. R., Freudenburg,W.R. (2004), Postindustrialization and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental State, Social Forces, 83(1),157-188.
47.Fogler, H.R. & Nutt, F. (1975), A note on social responsibility and stock valuation,Academy of Management Journal, 18(000001): 155-160.
48.Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1962)
49.Frooman, J. (1997, Sept.). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and
shareholder wealth, a meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society,
36(3):221-249.
50.Graafland, J.J., Eijffinger, S.C.W. (2004), Corporate social responsibility of Dutch companies: benchmarking, transparency and robustness, De Economist, 152(3),403-426.
51.Griffin, J.J. & Mahon, J.F. (1997, Mar.). The corporate social performance and
corporate financial performance debate : Twenty-five years of incomparable
research. Business and Society, 3(1): 5-31.
52.Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
53.Hart, S.L. (1997, Jan.-Feb.). Beyond Greenings:Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1): 66-76.
54.Harvey, B. & Schaefer, A. (2001, Apr.). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: a study of U.K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business
Ethics, 30(3): 243-260.
55.Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. (1996), The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm:an empirical approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30(26), 381-395.
56.Hillman A.J., K. G. D. (2001), Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and
social issues: what''s the bottom line?, Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
57.Holmes, S. L. (1977), Corporate social performances: past and present areas of
commitment, Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 433-438.
58.Holland, L. (2003, Dec.). Can the principle of the ecological footprint be applied to measure the environmental sustainability of business? Corporate
Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(4): 224-232.
59.Holliday, C. (2001, Sep.). Sustainable growth, the DuPont way. Havard Business
Review, 79(8):129-132.
60.Hillman, A.J. & Keim, G.D. (2001, Feb.). Shareholder value, stakeholder
management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management
Journal, 22(2): 125-139.
61.Jones P., C. D., Hillier D. (2006), Corporate social responsibility and the UK
construction industry, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(3),134-150.
62.Jones, T.M. (1983, Oct.). An integrating framework for research in business and
society: a step toward the elusive paradigm? The Academy of Management
Review, 8(000004): 559-564.
63.Keim, G.D. (1978, Jan.). Corporate social responsibility: an assessment of the
enlightened self-interest model. The Academy of Management Review,
3(1): 32-39.
64.Knoepfel, I., 2001. Dow Jones Sustainability Groupo Index: A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environment Strategy. 8(1), 6-15.
65.Kuosmanen, T., Kortelainen, M. (2005), Measuring eco-efficiency of production
with data envelopment analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),59-72.
66.Kuo, L.C.(2005). The causal relationship of corporate sustainability and
profitability. MBA thesis, Department of Business Administration, National
Central University, Taiwan.
67.Lazonic, W. (1999), The Japanese economy and corporate reform: what path to
sustainable prosperity?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(4), 607-633.
68.Litz, R.A. (1996), A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm:
stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as
strategic assets, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12): 1355-1363.
69.Mahlbert , B., Obersteiner, M., 2001. Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment
analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Interim Report IR-01-069, Laxemburg, Austria.
70.Marrewijk, M.v. (2003, May), Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate
sustainability: Between agency and communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95-105.
71.Margolis, J.D. & Walsh, J.P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link
between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
72.Maxwell, J., Rothenberg, S., Briscoe, F. & Marcus, A. (Spring 1997). Green
schemes: corporate environmental strategies and their implementation.
California Management Review, 39(3): 118-120.
73.Mendenhall, M.E., Macomber, J.H., Cutright, M.(2000), Mary Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity, Journal of Management History, 6(4), 191-202.
74.Möller, A., Schaltegger, S. (2005), The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),73-83.
75.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.(2000, May). Research notes and communications.
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or
misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603-609.
76.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001, Jan.). Note. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1):
117-127.
77.Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997, Oct.). Toward a theory of
stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what
really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886.
78.Mill, G.A. (Spring 2006). The financial performance of a socially responsible
investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility.
Journal of Business Ethics, 63:131-148.
79.Molnar, E. & Mulvihill, P.R. (2003). Sustainability-focused organizational learning:recent experiences and new challenges. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2): 167-176.
80.Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1(1): 71-75.
81.Moon, Jeremy. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to
sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5):296.
82.Norton,B.G. & Toman, M.A. (1997, Nov.). Sustainability: Ecologist and economic perspectives. Land Economics, 73(4): 553-568.
83.Osés-Eraso, N., Viladrich-Grau M. (2007), On the sustainability of common
property resources, Jounal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3),393-401.
84.Orlitzky, M. (2001, Sep.). Does firm size confound the relationship between socialperformance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2):167-180.
85.Orlitzky, M. & Benjamin, J.D. (2001, Dec.). Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business and society, 40(4): 369-396.
86.Oktem, U., Lewis, P., Donovan, D., Hagan, J.R. & Pace, T. (Summer 2004). EMS and sustainable development. A model and comparative studies of integration. Greener Management International, 46: 11-28.
87.Panchak, P. (2002), Time for a triple bottom line, Industry Week, 5(251), 7.
88.Parthasarathy, G., Hart, R., Jamro, Ed., Miner, L. (2005), Value of sustainability:
perspectives of a chemical manufacturing site, Clean Technologies and
Environmental Policy, 3(7),219-229.
89.Pava, M.L. Krausz, J. (1996, Mar.). The association of CSR and financial
performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3):
321-357.
90.Porter, M.E. & van der Linde, C. (1995, Sep.- Oct.). Green and competitive--
Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5):120-134.
91.Palmer, K., Oates, W.E. & Portney, P.R.(Fall 1995). Tightening environmental
standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? The Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 9(4): 119-132.
92.Reed, R.,R.J. DeFillippi. (1990), Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and
Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review,
15(1),88-102.
93.Russo, M.V. & Fouts, P.A. (1997), A resource-based perspective on corporate
environmental performance and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.
94.Russo, M. V. (2003), The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital, Strategic Management Journal, 24(4),317-331.
95.Reinhardt, F. (Summer 1998). Environmental product differentiation:
Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4): 43-73.
96.Reinhardt, F. (2000, May/Jun.). Sustainability and the firm. Interface, 30(3): 26-41.
97.Rennings, K. Schröder, M. Ziegler, A. (2003, Winter). The Economic
Performance of European Stock Corporations. Greener Management International, 44: 33-43
98.Rugman, A.M. & Verbeke, A.(1998, Apr.). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4):363-375.
99.Rowley, T.J. (1997, Oct.). Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of
stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887-910.
100.Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U.(2005). The business case for
corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European
Management Journal, 23(1): 27-36.
101.Schuler, D.A. & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate
financial performance behavioral model for consumers. The Academy of
Management Review, 31(3): 540-558.
102.Sethi, S.P. (1979, Jan.). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of
Social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. The Academy of
Management Review, 4(1): 63-74.
103.Simpson, G., 2005. Programmatic efficiency comparisons between unequally
sized groups of DMUs in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 56(12),1431-1438.
104.Simpson, G., 2007. A cautionary note on methods of comparing programmatic
Efficiency between two or more groups of DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 28(1-2), 141-147.
105.Strand, R. (1983, Jan.). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the
social environment. The Academy of Management Review, 8(000001): 90-96.
106.Stanwick, P.A. & Stanwick S.D. (1998a, Jan.). The relationship between
corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business
Ethics, 17(2): 195-204.
107.Stanwick, P.A. & S.D. (1998b). Corporate social responsiveness: an empirical
examination using the environmental disclosure index. International Journal of
Commerce & Management, 8(3/4): 26-40.
108.Stead, E., McKinney, M.M., Stead, J.G., 1998. Institutionalizing environmental
performance in US industry: is it happening and what if it does not? Business
Strategy and the environment. 7(5), 261-270.
109.Schaefer, A. (2004, Dec.). Corporate sustainability-integrating environmental
and social concerns? Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 11(4): 179-187.
110.Sturdivant, F.D. & Ginter, J.L. (Spring 1977). Corporate social responsiveness.
Management attitudes and economic performance. California Management
Review, 19. (000003): 30-39.
111.Simpson, W. G. & Kohers, T. (2002, Jan.). The link between corporate social
and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2): 97-109.
112.Sarkis, J., Weinrach, J. (2001), Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate
environmentally conscious waste treatment technology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 417-427.
113.Sharma, S., Henriques I.(2005), Stakeholder influences on sustainability
practices in the Canadian forest products industry, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159-180.
114.Shrivastava, P. (1995), The role of corporations in achieving ecological
sustainability, The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-961.
115.Siegel, S. Castellan, N.J.Jr. (1988), Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral
sciences., McGraw-Hill Book Co.:Singapore.
116.Sturdivant, F.D. & Ginter, J.L. (1977), Corporate social responsiveness.
Management attitudes and economic performance, California Management Review, 19. (000003): 30-39.
117.Thorpe, J. & Prakash-Mani, K. (Winter 2003). Developing value. The business
case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International,
44(44): 17-32.
118.Tsolas, I. (2008). Derivation of mineral processing environmental sustainability
Indicators using a DEA weight-restricted algorithm. Trade and Industry, 25(4):199-205.
119.Tuzzolino, F. & Armandi, B.R.(1981, Jan.). A Need-hierarchy framework for
assessing corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 21-28.
120.Viederman, S. (1993, Apr.) Sustainable development: what is it and how do we
get there? Current History, 92(573): 180-185.
121.Verschoor, C.C. & Murphy, E.A. (2002). The financial performance of large
U.S. firms and those with global prominence: how do they best corporate citizens rate? Business and Society Review, 107(3): 371-380.
122.Voinov,A., (2008). Understanding and communicating sustainability: global
versus regional perspectives. Environment, Development and Sustainability,
10(4):487-501.
123.Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S. (2004), The effect of corporate environmental
Strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing, European Management Journal, 22(5), 557-572.
124.Wagner, M. (2005), Sustainability and competitive advantage: empirical
evidence on the influence of strategic choices between environmental management approaches, Environmental Quality Management, 14(3), 31-48.
125.Watson, K., Klingenberg, B., Polito, T. & Geurts, T.G. (2004), Impact of
environmental management system implementation on financial performance: a
comparison of two corporate strategies, Management of Environmental Quality,
15(6): 622-628.
126.Weber, O. (2005), Sustainability benchmarking of European banks and
financial service organizations, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(2), 73-87.
132.Waddock, S.A. & Graves, S.B. (1997, April). The corporate social performance
-finance performance link. Strategic Management Journal,(18)4: 303-319.
127.Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T. & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002, Sep.). The
relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an
empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate
Social–Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3): 133-146.
128.Wagner, M. & Schaltegger, S. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental
strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5): 557-572.
129.Wagner, M. (Spring 2005). Sustainability and competitive advantage: empirical
evidence on the influence of strategic choices between environmental
management approaches. Environmental Quality Management, 14(3): 31-48.
130.Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P.L. (1985, Oct.). The evolution of the corporate
social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(000004):
758-769.
131.WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development),( 1987), Our
Common Future (The Brundtland Report) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
132.Wilkinson, A., Hill, M. & Gollan, P. (2001). The sustainability debate.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12): 1492-1502.
133.Walley, N. & Whitehead, B. (1994, May-Jun.). It’s not easy being green.
Harvard Business Review, 72(3):46-51.
134.Wood, D.J. (1991, Oct.). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy
of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718.
135.Young, W., Tilley, F., 2006. Can Business Move Beyond Efficiency? The Shift
toward Effectiveness and Equity in the Corporate Sustainability Debate. Business Strategy and the Environment.15(6),402-415.
136.Zenisek, T.J. (1979, Jul.). Corporate social responsibility: a conceptualization
bsed on organizational literature. The Academy of Management Review, 4(3):359-368.
137.Zhang, Y., Bartels, R., 1998. The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency
in DEA with an application to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of Productivity analysis. 9(3), 187-204.
|