臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從關係網絡觀點探討社會網絡網站使用之研究─以大學生使用Facebook為例
作者：凃保民
作者(外文)：Bau-Min Tu
校院名稱：臺灣大學
系所名稱：資訊管理學研究所
指導教授：謝清佳
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2010
主題關鍵詞：社會網絡網站；臉書；關係網絡；媒體豐富理論；科技接受模式；否證論；社會網絡分析；俗民誌學；性別隔閡；同儕團體；social network sites (SNSs)；Facebook；relationship networks；media richness theory；technology acceptance model (TAM)；falsificationism；social network analysis；ethnography；gender gaps；peer group
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:120
近年來社會網絡網站(social network sites, SNSs)開始受到全世界的矚目，有愈來愈多的使用者用其來建立或維繫與朋友間的社會關係，而這股使用浪潮也開始吸引不同領域學者的注意。然而，值得資管學界學者加以深思的，是當人與人之間的互動方式，從面對面的情境逐漸轉移到SNSs的平台之後，會對現實生活的人際互動造成什麼改變？當SNSs促使網路社群力量的崛起，又會對未來的社會與組織帶來什麼衝擊？因此瞭解使用者為什麼採用SNSs來發展虛擬的人際關係，以及探討使用者使用SNSs之後，會對現實生活造成什麼影響，將有助於資管學界進一步瞭解SNSs與網路社群之間的關係，故有其研究的必要性。
本研究經由文獻整理後，認為目前SNSs的相關研究有兩點研究方法上的限制。第一、以個人的人格特質做為自變數，透過統計分析方法來探討這些因素如何影響SNSs的使用，但統計分析過程中已將結果抽象化，因此無法說明SNSs是在什麼「情境」之下幫助使用者建立起關係網絡。第二、研究主要是透過抽樣方法進行，但抽樣的結果也無法呈現研究對象在SNSs中真正的關係網絡。因此，本研究以關係網絡的觀點為基礎，以某專科學校資管科的一整個班級來進行大學生使用SNSs之行為研究，並以學生在Facebook（中文譯為臉書）上的互動，作為網路互動的觀察標的。
本研究探討兩個研究問題。第一個研究問題在瞭解使用者基於什麼理由採用SNSs以加入網路社群。本研究從理論面的角度，選擇「媒體豐富理論」、「科技接受模式」與「關係網絡觀點」三個科技採用的相關理論，探討何種理論對於使用者採用SNSs的行為有較佳的解釋能力。第二個研究問題在瞭解當使用者採用了SNSs之後，使用者在實體的現實生活與虛擬的SNSs上的人際關係網絡會產生什麼變化。本研究從現象面著手，探討SNSs的使用者在現實生活以及在SNSs中的關係網絡有何差異，以及造成差異的因素為何。針對第一個研究問題，本研究運用否證論來進行理論的測試；而第二個研究問題，本研究透過關係網絡的觀點，採用社會網絡分析與俗民誌學來進行分析。
根據第一個研究問題，本研究發現三個相互競爭的科技採用理論中，「關係網絡觀點」對於使用者為何採用SNSs有較佳的解釋能力。由於關係網絡觀點並不著重於豐富媒體或行為者個人認知使用科技的行為；相反的，強調的是透過整體網絡關係、結構及位置來影響使用者選擇科技的行為。因此本研究認為SNSs是一種維繫或改變關係網絡的工具，大學生會因為在團體中所處的網絡位置及特性而決定是否使用SNSs。
第二個研究問題，本研究從研究對象的分析中發掘出兩個值得注意的議題，包括性別的隔閡與同儕團體的界線。此外，本研究也發現Facebook扮演著促進關係網絡發展的角色，包括「友誼催化劑」，指的是觸發關係網絡從無到有的一個媒介；以及「友誼潤滑劑」，指的是朋友間的關係網絡可能存在，但受到某些環境限制，因此透過Facebook來排除障礙或提供另一個溝通的管道。
最後，本研究提出理論上、研究方法上及實務上的意涵，以及對未來研究方向的建議。
In recent years, the trend of social networking sites (SNSs), and the social relationships constructed or maintained within them, has gained increasing global attention from scholars of various fields. However, scholars of information management should further consider the following questions. As interpersonal interactions gradually turn from face-to-face situations to platforms within SNSs, how will it influence the reality of interpersonal interactions? As SNSs result in increased internet communities, how will it influence future societies and organizations? By probing into the reason that users develop virtual interpersonal relationships through SNSs, and the influence of users’ use of SNSs on reality, information management scholars will recognize the relationships between SNSs and internet communities.
Upon literature review, this study suggests that current researches on SNSs reveal two limitations in research methods. First, upon individual personality traits as independent variables, statistical analysis is conducted in order to determine how the factors influence the use of SNSs. However, the statistical analysis results are abstract and cannot indicate the “contexts” in which SNSs allow users to construct relationship networks. Secondly, research is based on sampling; however, the outcome of sampling cannot demonstrate the subjects’ actual relationship networks in SNSs. Therefore, upon relationship networks, this study treats one class, namely, an information management department of a college, as the subjects in order to probe into college students’ use of SNSs, where students’ interactions on Facebook are the observation target of online interactions.
This study probes into two research issues. The first issue is to determine the reason for user participation in internet communities through SNSs. In terms of theories, according to three technology adoption related theories, namely, media richness theory, technology acceptance model, and relationship networks, this study attempts to determine which theory reveals better explanation power for users’ use of SNS. The second issue is in regard to users’ changes in life style, based upon interpersonal relationship networks in reality and on virtual SNSs upon using SNSs. Upon this phenomenon, this research explores the differences between SNSs users’ relationship networks in reality, and on SNSs and the factors that comprise the difference. Regarding the first issue, falsificationism is adopted to test the theory; while for the second issue, relationship networks, analysis is based upon social network analysis and ethnography.
As to the first issue, this study demonstrates that among the three competing technology adoption related theories; “relationship networks” reveal better explanation power for users’ use of SNSs. The perspective of relationship networks does not aim to enhance media or the users’ personal recognition of technology use; instead, it emphasizes the influence on users’ selections of technology, according to overall network relationships, structure, and positions. Therefore, this study suggests that SNSs are tools to maintain or change relationship networks. College students will determine the use of SNSs according to their network positions and characteristics within a group.
Regarding the second issue, two interesting themes are discovered from subject analysis, namely, gender gap and limitations of peer groups. In addition, it demonstrates that Facebook enhances the development of relationship networks, as it is a “friendship catalyst” (media to trigger the construction of relationship networks) and a “friendship facilitator” (possible relationship networks among friends; however, they are restricted by certain environments). Thus, Facebook avoids obstacles and provides other communication channels.
Finally, this study indicates the implications of the theories, research methods, practices, and suggestions for future research directions.
一、中文部分
【1】大紀元新聞網，西澳教師或被禁止用Facebook聯繫學生，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/9/11/25/n2734058.htm (accessed Nov 25, 2009)。
【2】中央社，Facebook創辦人：網路隱私權已非潮流，http://www.cna.com.tw/SearchNews/doDetail.aspx?id=201001110146&q=Facebook%e9%9a%b1%e7%a7%81%e6%ac%8a (accessed Jan 11, 2010)。
【3】江旻峻著，Web 2.0時代網路發展策略─從整合性關係建立網站之觀點出發，臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文，民國95年。
【4】林千乃著，網路社群互動現象之詮釋性研究，台灣大學資訊管理研究所未出版博士論文，民國98年。
【5】徐桂尼著，以投資購併終結之Web2.0網站特性之研究─以Facebook、無名小站、YouTube為例，世新大學資訊管理學研究所未出版碩士論文，民國97年。
【6】張紹勳著，研究方法，滄海書局，民國90年。
【7】張嘉玲著，在Web2.0之下應用協作於在地化流程─以Mozilla Firefox—MozTW在地化專案與Facebook—中文(台灣)翻譯應用程式為例U，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國97年。
【8】梁媛潁著，社會交友網站─以Friendster.com, Facebook.com, MySpace.com為例，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國96年。
【9】陳品宏著，面對面與Facebook之人際互動研究，台灣大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國98年。
【10】黃光國著，社會科學的理路，二版，心理出版社，民國92年。
【11】新華網，臺灣公務人員上班“種菜”各縣市政府紛禁玩_臺灣頻道_新華網，http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news. xinhuanet.com/tw/2009-10/14/content_12227365.htm (accessed Mar 11, 2010)。
【12】劉仲冬著，俗民誌學及實例。胡幼慧編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，巨流圖書公司，民國85年。
【13】劉佳妍著，社群網絡口碑傳播與使用者行為關聯之研究─以Facebook社群網路為例，中國文化大學新聞研究所未出版碩士論文，民國98年。
【14】潘淑滿著，質性研究：理論與應用，心理出版社，民國92年。
【15】蔡岳吟著，以價值網路觀點探討Web 2.0平台價值創造─以Facebook社群網站為例，實踐大學資訊科技與管理學研究所未出版碩士論文，民國96年。
【16】蔡繼正著，社會網路服務網站的利益─以Facebook為例，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國96年。
【17】聯合新聞網，上班Facebook種菜「非死不可」─線上國度─網路文化─udn數位資訊，http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/ storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=314&f_SUB_ID=2922&f_ART_ID= 214971 (accessed Mar 11, 2010)。
【18】簡士超著，成年前期男性之寂寞因應行為研究─以Facebook使用者為例，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所未出版碩士論文，民國98年。

二、英文部分
【1】Agre, P.E. “Life after cyberspace.” EASST Review, Vol. 18, no. 3, 1999, http://www.easst.net/review/sept1999/agre.
【2】Alexa. Alexa top 500 global sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites (accessed Oct 15, 2009).
【3】Alexa. Plurk.com-Site Info from Alexa. http://www.alexa.com/ siteinfo/plurk.com (accessed Feb 1, 2010).
【4】Anderson Analytics. College Students Say Facebook is the Only Social Networking Site that Really Matters, http://www.andersonanalytics.com/index.php?mact=News, cntnt01,getfile,1&cntnt01filename=20091208.pdf&cntnt01returnid=46&page=46 (accessed Mar 11, 2010).
【5】Baker, J.R. and S.M. Moore. “Distress, coping, and blogging: Comparing new MySpace users by their intention to blog.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 11, no. 1, 2008, pp.81-85.
【6】Bargh, J. and K. McKenna. “The Internet and social life.” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 55, no. 1, 2004, pp.573-590.
【7】Bargh, J., K. McKenna and G. Fitzimons. “Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the Internet.” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 58, no. 1, 2002, pp.33-48.
【8】Baym, N. “Interpersonal life online.” In Handbook of New Media, L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds.), London, Sage Publications, 2002, pp.62-76.
【9】Boase, J. and B. Wellman. “Personal relationships: On and off the internet.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, D. Perlman and A. Vangelisti (eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp.709-723.
【10】Boorman, S.A. and H.C. White. “Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role structures.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 81, no. 6, pp.1384-1446.
【11】Borgatti, S.P., M,G. Everett and L.C. Freeman. Ucient 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, Analytic Technologies, 2002.
【12】Boyd D.M. and N.B. Ellison. “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, no. 1, 2007, pp.210-230.
【13】Brunelle, E. “Introducing media richness into an integrated model of consumers'' intentions to use online stores in their purchase process.” Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 8, no. 3/4, 2009, pp.222-245.
【14】Burkhardt, M.E. and D.J. Brass. “Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, no. 1, 1990, pp.104-127.
【15】Burt, R.L. “Positions in networks.” Social Forces, Vol. 55, no. 1, 1976, pp.93-122.
【16】Carlson, J.R. and R.W. Zmud. “Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, no. 2, 1999, pp.153-170.
【17】Carr, N.G. “IT doesn’t matter.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81, no. 5, 2003, pp.41-49.
【18】Cassidy, J. “Me media.” The New Yorker, May 15, 2006, pp.50-59.
【19】Checkfacebook. Facebook marketing statistics, demographics, reports, and news. http://www.checkfacebook.com (accessed Sep. 23, 2010).
【20】Chenault, B. “Developing personal and emotional relationships via computer-mediated communication.” CMC Magazine, May, 1998.
【21】Cheng, G.H.-L., M. Phil, D.K.-S. Chan and P.Y. Tong. “Qualities of online friendships with different gender compositions and durations.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 9, no. 1, 2006, pp.14-21.
【22】Cheung, C.M.K. and M.K.O. Lee. “A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 49, no. 1, 2010, pp.24-30.
【23】Cho, C.H., J.R. Phillips, A.M. Hageman and D.M. Patten. “Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 22, no. 6, 2009, pp.933-952.
【24】Christofides, E., A. Muise and S. Desmarais. “Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, no. 3, 2009, pp. 341-345.
【25】Clark, M.L. and M. Ayers. “Friendship expectations and friendship evaluations: Reciprocity and gender effects.” Youth & Society, Vol. 24, 1993, pp.299-313.
【26】Cole, H. and M.D. Griffiths. “Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 10, no. 4, 2007, pp. 575-583.
【27】Culnan, M.J. and M.L. Markus. “Information technologies.” In Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K.H. Roberts and L.W. Porter (eds.), CA, Newbury Park, Sage, 1987, pp.420-443.
【28】Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel. “Information richness: A new approach to manager information processing and organization design.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, B. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Greenwich, Conn, JAI Press, 1984.
【29】Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel. “Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants.” Management Science, Vol. 32, no. 5, 1986, pp.554-571.
【30】Daft, R.L., R.H. Lengel and L.K. Trevino. “Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, no. 3, 1987, pp.355-366.
【31】Daft, R.L. and N.B. Macintosh. “A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, no. 2, 1981, pp.207-224.
【32】David, G., E. Karahanna and D.W. Straub. “Trust and TAM in online shipping: An integrated model.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, no. 1, 2003, pp.51-90.
【33】Davis, F.D. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, no. 3, 1989, pp.319-340.
【34】Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw. “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.” Management Science, Vol. 35, no. 8, 1989, pp.982-1003.
【35】Dennis, A.R. and S.T. Kinney. “Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality.” Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, no. 3, 1998, pp.256-274.
【36】di Gennaro C. and W.H. Dutton. “Reconfiguring friendships: Social relationships and the Internet.” Information, Communication & Society, Vol.10, no. 5, 2007, pp.591-618.
【37】Dong, Q., M.A. Urista and D. Gundrum. “The impact of emotional intelligence, self-esteem, and self-image on romantic communication over MySpace.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 11, no. 5, 2008, pp. 577-578.
【38】Doolin, B. “Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system.” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14, no. 4, 2004, pp.343-362.
【39】Downey, H.K. and J.W. Slocum. “Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, no. 3, 1975, pp.562-577.
【40】El-Shinnawy, M. and M.L. Markus. “The poverty of media richness theory: Explaining people''s choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 46, no.4, 1997, pp.443-467.
【41】Ellison N.B., C. Steinfield and C. Lampe. “The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, no. 4, 2007, pp. 1143-1168.
【42】Etzioni A. and O. Etzioni. “Face-to-Face and computer-mediated communities: A comparative analysis.” The Information Society, Vol. 15, no. 4, 1999, pp.241-248.
【43】Feldman, M.S. “Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations.” Office: Technology and People, Vol. 3, no. 2, 1987, pp.83-101.
【44】Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA, Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1975.
【45】Fogel, J. and E. Nehmad. “Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol, 25, no. 1, 2009, pp.153-160.
【46】Freeman, L.C. “Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification.” Social Networks, Vol. 1, no. 3, 1979, pp.215-239.
【47】Freeman, L.C. “The impact of computer based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific specialty.” Social Networks, Vol. 6, no. 3, 1984, pp.201-221.
【48】Fullwood, C., N. Sheehan and W. Nicholls. “Blog function revisited: A content analysis of MySpace blogs.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, no. 6, 2009, pp.685-689.
【49】Galbraith, J. Organizational Design. MA, Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1977.
【50】Goby, V.P. “Physical space and cyberspace: How do they interrelate? A study of offline and online social interaction choice in Singapore.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 6, no. 6, 2003, pp.639-644.
【51】Goby, V.P. “Personality and online/offline choices: MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 9, no. 1, 2006, pp.5-13.
【52】Gopal, A. and P. Prasad. “Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: Shifting the focus from technology to interaction.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, no. 3, 2000, pp. 509-546.
【53】Gross, R. and A. Acquisti. “Information revelation and privacy in online social networks.” Paper presented at the WEPS’05, Virginia, Alexandria, 2005.
【54】Ha, S. and L. Stoel. “Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, no. 5, 2009, pp.565-571.
【55】Haridakis, P. and G. Hanson. “Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 53, no. 2, 2009, pp.317-335.
【56】Hashim, J. “Factors influencing the acceptance of web-based training in Malaysia: Applying the technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Training & Development, Vol. 12, no. 4, 2008, pp.253-264.
【57】Haythornthwaite, C. “Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media.” The Information Society, Vol. 18, no. 5, 2002, pp.385-401.
【58】Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff. The Network Nation: Human Communication vai Computer. MA, Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1978.
【59】Hitwise, Facebook Reaches Top Ranking in US, http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/2010/03/facebook_reaches_top_ranking_i.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+hitwise%2Fus+%28Hitwise+Intelligence+US%29 (accessed Mar 17, 2010).
【60】Hobman, E.V., P. Bordia, B. Irmer and A. Chang. “The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups.” Small Group Research, Vol. 33, no. 4, 2002, pp.439-465.
【61】Horton, R.P., T. Buck, P.E. Waterson and C.W. Clegg. “Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model.” Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 16, no. 4, 2001, pp.237-249.
【62】Hossain L. and A. de Silva. “Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks.” Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 20, no. 1, 2009, pp.1-18.
【63】Hughes, A.L. and L. Palen. “Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference, 2009.
【64】Java, A., T. Finin, X. Song and B. Tseng. “Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop, 2007.
【65】Johnson, H.D. “Gender, grade, and relationship differences in emotional closeness within adolescent friendships.” Adolescence, Vol. 39, no. 154, 2004, pp.243-255.
【66】Kahai, S.S. and R.B. Cooper. “Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision Quality.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, no. 1, 2003, pp.263-299.
【67】Kang, S. “Disembodiment in online social interaction: Impact of online chat on social support and psychosocial well-being.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 10, no. 3, 2007, pp.475-477.
【68】Karpinski, A., P.F. Gorder and J. Grabmeier. “Study Finds Link Between Facebook Use, Lower Grades in College.” http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/facebookusers.htm (accessed Mar 11, 2009).
【69】Kendall, K. E. “The significance of information systems research on emerging technologies: Seven information technologies that promise to improve managerial effectiveness.” Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, no. 4, 1997, pp.775-792.
【70】Kiesler, S., J. Siegel and T.W. McGuire. “Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication.” American Psychologist, Vol. 39, no. 10, 1984, pp.1123-1134.
【71】Kim, D. and H. Chang. “Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 76, no. 11-12, 2007, pp.790-800.
【72】Kim, H.-W. and A. Kankanhalli. “Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33 , no. 3, 2009, pp.567-582.
【73】Kishi, M. “Perceptions and use of electronic media: Testing the relationship between organizational interpretation differences and media richness.” Information & Management, Vol. 45, no. 5, 2008, pp.281-287.
【74】Knight, M.B., J.M. Pearson and D.S. Hunsinger. “The role of media richness in information technology-supported communication in group cohesion, agreeability, and Performance.” Journal of Organizational & End User Computing, Vol. 20, no. 4, 2008, pp.23-44.
【75】Koufaris, M. “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior.” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, no. 2, 2002, pp.205-223.
【76】Kraut, R., S. Kiesler, B. Boneva, J. Cummings, V. Hegelson and A. Crawford. “Internet paradox revisited.” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 58, no. 1, 2002, pp.49-74.
【77】Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukhopadhyay and W. Scherlis. “Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?” American Psychologist, Vol. 53, no. 9, 1998, pp.1017-1031.
【78】Kwon, O. and Y. Wen. “An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, no. 2, 2010, pp.254-263.
【79】Lai, V. S. and H. Li. “Technology acceptance model for Internet banking: An invariance analysis.” Information & Management, Vol. 42, no. 2, 2005, pp.373-386.
【80】Lampe, C., N. Ellison and C. Steinfield. “A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2007, pp.435-444.
【81】Lederer, A.L., D.J. Maupin, M.P. Sena and Y. Zhuang. “The technology acceptance model and the world wide web.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, no. 3, 2000, pp.269-282.
【82】Lee, A.S. “A scientific methodology for MIS case study.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, no. 1, 1989, pp.33-50.
【83】Lee, A.S. and G.S. Hubona. “A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, no. 2, 2009, pp.237-262.
【84】Li, C. and J. Bernoff. Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. MA, Boston, Harvard Business Press, 2008.
【85】Liu, D.M. “Social network profiles as taste performances.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, no. 1, 2007, pp.252-275.
【86】Liu, S.-H., H.-L. Liao and J.A. Pratt. “Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance.” Computers & Education, Vol. 52, no. 3, 2009, pp.599-607.
【87】Madell, D.E. and S.J. Muncer. “Control over social interactions: An important reason for young people’s use of the Internet and mobile phones for communication?” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 10, no. 1, 2007, pp.137-140.
【88】Magnuson, M.J. and L. Dundes. “Gender differences in ‘social portraits’ reflected in MySpace profiles.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 11, no. 2, 2008, pp.239-241.
【89】Malinoswki, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. NY, E.P. Dutton, 1961.
【90】Markus, M.L. “Power, politics, and MIS implementation.” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, no. 6, 1983, pp.430-444.
【91】Markus, M.L. “Electronic mail as the medium of Managerial choice.” Organization Science, Vol. 5, no.4, 1994, pp.502-527.
【92】McKenna, K., A. Green and M. Gleason. “Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 58, no. 1, 2002, pp.9-31.
【93】McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and J.M. Cook. “Birds of a feather.” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27, 2002, pp.415-444.
【94】Mesch, G. “A study of adolescents’ online and offline social relationships.” OII Research Report 8, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, [Online] Available at: http://www.oil ox.ac.uk/research/publications/PR8.pdf, 2005.
【95】Mesch G. and I. Talmud. “The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships.” The information Society, Vol. 22, no. 3, 2006, pp. 137-148.
【96】Morakot on Plurk. http://www.plurk.com/floods (accessed Sep 15, 2009).
【97】Muise, A., E. Christofides and S. Desmarais. “More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, no. 4, 2009, pp. 441-444.
【98】Newman, B.M., B.J. Lohman and P.R. Newman. “Peer group membership and a sense of belonging: Their relationship to adolescent behavior problems.” Adolescence, Vol. 42, no. 166, 2007, pp.241-263.
【99】Nie, N.H. and L. Erbring. Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford Institutive for the Quantitative Study of Society. CA, Stanford, 2000.
【100】Nosko, A., E. Wood and S. Molema. “All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of Facebook.” Computers in Human, Vol. 26, no. 3, 2010, pp.406-418.
【101】Oldenburg, R. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts and How They Get You Through the Day, 2nd ed., New York: Marlowe and Company, 1997.
【102】Orr E.S., M. Sisic, C. Ross, M.G. Simmering, J.M. Arseneault and R.R. Orr. “The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, no. 3, 2009, pp. 337-340.
【103】Otondo, R.F., J.R. Van Scotter, D.G. Allen and P. Palvia. “The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes.” Information & Management, Vol. 45, no. 1, 2008, pp.21-30.
【104】Pavlou, P.A. “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance Model.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, no. 3, 2003, pp.101-134.
【105】Pempek T.A., Y.A. Yermolayeva and S.L. Calvert. “College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30, no. 3, 2009, pp.227-238.
【106】Pollach, I. “Media richness in online consumer interactions: An exploratory study of consumer-opinion web sites.” Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 21, no. 4, 2008, pp.49-65.
【107】Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Hutchinson, 1934.
【108】Popper, K. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972/1989.
【109】Porter, C.E. and N. Donthu. “Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, no. 9, 2006, pp.999-1007.
【110】Prasad, P. “Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, no. 6, 1993, pp.1400-1429.
【111】Quan-Haase, A. “University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus.” Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 10, no. 5, 2007, pp.671-693.
【112】Raacke J. and J. Bonds-Raacke. “MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 11, no. 2, 2008, pp.169-174.
【113】Rice, R.E., A. Sheperd, W.H. Dutton and J.E. Katz. “Social interaction and the Internet: A comparative analysis of surveys in the US and Britain.” In Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, A.N. Joinson, K.Y.A. McKenna, T. Postmes and U.R. Reips (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp.7-30.
【114】Roca J.C., C.-M. Chiu and F.J. Martínez. “Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, no. 8, 2006, pp.683-696.
【115】Ross, C., E.S. Orr, M. Sisic, J.M. Arseneault, M.G. Simmering and R.R. Orr. “Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, no. 2, 2009, pp.578-586.
【116】Rowe, F. and D. Struck. “Cultural values, media richness and telecommunication use in an organization.” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, no. 3, 1999, pp.161-192.
【117】Saadé, R. and B. Bahli. “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Information & Management, Vol. 42, no. 2, 2005, pp.317-327.
【118】Sakaki, T., M. Okazaki and Y. Matsuo. “Earthquake shakes twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, 2010.
【119】Sanchez-Franco, M.J. “WebCT – The quasimoderating effect of perceived affective quality on an extending Technology Acceptance Model.” Computers & Education, Vol. 54, no. 1, 2010, pp.37-46.
【120】Schaper, L.K. and G.P. Pervan. “ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists.” International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 76, Supplement 1, 2007, pp.S212-S221.
【121】Scheck, S., K. Allmendinger and K. Hamann. “The effects of media richness on multilateral negotiations in a collaborative virtual environment.” Journal of Media Psychology, Vol. 20, no. 2, 2008, pp.57-66.
【122】Schultze, U. and Orlikowski, W.J. “A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies.” Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, no. 1, 2004, pp.87-106.
【123】Seder J.P. and S. Oishi. “Ethnic/racial homogeneity in college students’ Facebook friendship networks and subjective well-being.” Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 43, no. 3, 2009, pp. 438-443.
【124】Shapiro, C. and H.R. Varian. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
【125】Shin, D.H. “Understanding user acceptance of DMB in South Korea using the modified technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 25, no. 3, 2009, pp.173-198.
【126】Shin, D.-H. and W.-Y. Kim. “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to Cyworld user behavior: Implication of the Web2.0 user acceptance.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 11, no. 3, 2008, pp.378-382.
【127】Short, J., E. Williams and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. UK, Chichester, John Wiley, 1976.
【128】Simon, S.J. and S.C. Peppas. “An examination of media richness theory in product web site design: An empirical study.” Info, Vol. 6, no. 4, 2004, pp.270-281.
【129】Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler. “Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication.” Management Science, Vol. 32, no. 11, 1986, pp.1492-1512.
【130】Stutzman, F. “An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities.” Paper presented at the iDMAa and IMS Code Conference, Ohio, Oxford, 2006.
【131】Subrahmanyam K., S.M. Reich, N. Waechter and G. Espinoza. “Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, no. 6, 2008, pp.420-433.
【132】Subrahmanyam, K., D. Šmahel and P.M. Greenfield. “Connecting developmental processes to the Internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chatrooms.” Developmental Psychology, Vol. 42, no. 3, 2006, pp.395-406.
【133】Suh, K.S. “Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory.” Information & Management, Vol. 35, no. 5, 1999, pp.295-312.
【134】Sun, P.-C. and H.K. Cheng. “The design of instructional multimedia in e-Learning: A media richness theory-based approach.” Computers & Education, Vol. 49, no. 3, 2007, pp.662-676.
【135】Thelwall, M. “Homophily in MySpace.” UJournal of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyU, Vol. 60, no. 2, 2009, pp.219-231.
【136】Thurlow, C., L. Lengel and A. Tomic. Computer Mediated Communication. London, Sage Publications, 2004.
【137】Tu, B.-M., H.-C. Wu, C. Hsieh and P.-H. Chen. “Establishing new friendships—From face-to-face to Facebook: A case study of college students.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2011a.
【138】Tu, B.-M., H.-C. Wu, C. Hsieh and J.-Y. Lin. “Applying the perspective of technology sensemaking to Plurk user behaviors: An exploratory study.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2011b.
【139】Tushman, M.L. and D.A. Nadler. “Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, no. 3, 1978, pp.613-624.
【140】Vickery, S.K., C. Droge, T.P. Stank, T.J. Goldsby and R.E. Markland. “The performance implications of media richness in a business-to-business service environment: Direct versus indirect effects.” Management Science, Vol. 50, no. 8, 2004, pp.1106-1119.
【141】Vijayasarathy L.R. “Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model.” Information & Management, Vol. 41, no. 6, 2004, pp.747-762.
【142】Walther, J.B. “Impression development in computer-mediated interaction.” Western Journal of Communication, Vol. 57, no. 4, 1993, pp.381-398.
【143】Walther, J.B. “Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction.” Communication Research, Vol. 23, no. 1, 1996, pp.3-43.
【144】Walther, J.B. and J. Burgoon. “Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction.” Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, no. 1, 1992, pp.50-88.
【145】Wang, C.-C., S.-K. Lo and W. Fang. “Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation: The existence of network externalities.” Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 7, no. 2, 2008, pp.101-110.
【146】Wang, J.-C. and M.-J. Chiang. “Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 47, no. 4, 2009, pp.466-476.
【147】Wang, S.S. S.-I. Moon, K.H. Kwon, C.A. Evans and M.A. Stefanone. “Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, no. 2, 2010, pp.226-234.
【148】Weick, K.E. The Social Psychology of Organizing. MA, Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1979.
【149】Wellman, B. “Structural analysis: From method and petaphor to theory and substance.” In Social Structures: A Network Approach. B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz (eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp.19-61.
【150】Wellman, B. and M. Gulia. “Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities.” In Communities in Cyberspace, M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.), New York, Routledge, 1999, pp.167-194.
【151】White, H.C., S.A. Boorman and R.L. Breiger. “Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 81, no. 4, 1976, pp.730-779.
【152】Wikipedia. List of social networking websites-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_ networking_websites (accessed Feb 1, 2010).
【153】Williams, D. “Virtual cultivation: Online worlds, offline perceptions.” Journal of Communication, Vol. 56, no. 1, 2006, pp.69-87.
【154】Wilson, S.M. and L.C. Peterson. “The anthropology of online communities.” Annual Review Anthropology, Vol. 31, 2002, pp.449-467.
【155】Wood, A.F. and M.J. Smith. Online Communication. London, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.
【156】Workman, M., W. Kahnweiler and W. Bommer. “The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 63, no. 2, 2003, pp.199-219.
【157】Wu, J.-H. and S.-C. Wang. “What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.” Information & Management, Vol. 42, no. 5, 2005, pp.719-729.
【158】Yi, M.Y. and Y. Hwang. “Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 59, no. 4, 2003, pp.431-449.
【159】Young S., D. Dutta and G. Dommety. “Extrapolating psychological insights from Facebook profiles: A study of religion and relationship status.” CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, no. 3, 2009, pp.347-350.
【160】Zhao, D. and M.B. Bosson. “How and why people Twitter: The role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work, 2009.
【161】Zhao, S., S. Grasmuck and J. Martin. “Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, no. 5, 2008, pp.1816-1836.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：569（臺灣：568，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67552854
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上