臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：理解行動電話：流動的媒介與日常生活
作者：曹家榮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsao, Chia Rong
校院名稱：國立政治大學
系所名稱：社會學研究所
指導教授：黃厚銘
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2012
主題關鍵詞：行動電話；人─技術─世界；俗民方法學；技術現象學；混雜實在；個人化即刻連結；變異實作；後人類主體；mobile phones；human-technics-world；ethnomethodology；phenomenology of technology；hybrid reality；individualized and immediatized coonection；variant practices；post-human subject
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
本文試圖探究行動電話於當代普及所帶來的影響。一直以來，網際網路及隨之而生的「模控空間」都被看作是我們這個時代最重要的媒介與文化發展。然而，晚近十年間的電子媒介技術發展卻顯示出，行動電話已然成為網際網路之外同樣影響人們日常生活甚鉅的一種媒介。甚至，如同Howard Rheingold所指出的，它已逐漸地改變了我們當下與未來的生活形式。循此，簡言之，本文的目的即在於，試圖理解行動電話所帶來的是什麼樣的生活世界，以及這又是如何可能的？在回答此一問題時，本文所採取的基本理論觀點與分析架構乃是一種試圖超越過去技術決定論的新取徑。亦即，立基於「人─技術─世界」相互關連的關係性基礎上，本文主張，人們日常使用與操作技術的實作實際上總是展開於技術物所形塑的結構脈絡之中，同時，此一結構脈絡本身卻也是由人們的實作過程「有方法地」反身維繫與再建構的。換言之，本文將說明，實際上行動電話普及所帶來的影響不僅僅導因於技術特性的結構作用，同時也是人們日常實作持續建構與維繫的結果。
更清楚地說，在論文中我們指出了行動電話普及所導致的結構性變遷與影響為（1）由行動電話「水平嵌合」的延伸形式所帶來的「混雜實在」。也就是說，行動電話的使用者實際上是處於一種「雙面舞台」的情境之中。透過行動電話的中介，人們如今理所當然地將其脈絡視為是混雜交織著虛擬／物質、遠處／近在的指涉。（2）源自於行動電話「流動」的技術特性而逐漸形成的「即刻化時間」與「個人化社會空間」的時空框架。正是在這一轉變的時空框架中，浮現了本文稱之為「隨傳隨到的個人社群」的新形態人際關係樣態。而這些結構性的變遷與影響，在本文看來，同時也是人們日常實作持續「有方法地」完成、維繫與再生產的產物。以俗民方法學為基礎，本文回到實際日常使用與操作行動電話的實作過程中，探究人們是如何有方法地完成「打行動電話」的日常生活。例如，我們指出了「體現」與「轉譯」乃是人們操作行動電話理所當然地依賴著的方法；此外，由於「打行動電話」的實作仍「在」當下既存的互動場景之中，其完成也就有賴於「協同實作」的打造；人們的實作也顯示出，並不只是由於行動電話的技術特性與設計，更是因為人們總是有方法地管理、完成「打行動電話」的過程，人際之間的連結才呈現為「個人化即刻連繫」之樣態。
總之，藉由這些觀察與分析，本文試圖指出行動電話造就的「結構」實際上也是實作建構的產物。然而，雖然本文主張人們實際上參與了框限著自身的「結構」的建構，但這並不意味著人們就必然只能如此生存著。相反地，從「人─技術─世界」的相互關連來看，既然我們的日常生活並非單純由「技術」所決定的、既然我們的生存樣態同樣也取決於自身的「實作」，本文在最後試圖說明的便是，我們也就總是有著「不必然如此」的可能性。藉由三個案例的呈現，本文說明了「多元」的行動電話使用與操作實作如何可能。些實作並不是意圖正面對抗、顛覆既那些與行動電話實作相關的既有「常識」與「預設」，但在其迴避、繞道、偏離與走出的各種形式中，我們卻能清楚地看到實際行動電話的使用與操作中，如何不斷地逾越了既有的軌跡與秩序。換言之，回過頭來，本文試圖說明的是，「理解」行動電話同時也意味著我們必須要在各種「捨」與「得」的權衡之中做出選擇。在每一刻的行動電話操作實作之中，我們不僅選擇了如何完成當下的秩序，同時也選擇了走向什麼樣的「行動未來」。這不僅是「如何生活」──亦即，如何使用行動電話的選擇──的問題，同時也是關於「如何存在」──亦即，在更根本的層次上成為什麼樣的存有──的反思。
This thesis attempts to discuss the impacts brought by the prevalence of mobile phones. Although the Internet and the cyberspace have been thought as the most important media and cultural development of our age, the progress of the electronic media in recent decade has showed that mobile phones have also brought important structural changes in our life. Accordingly, what we want to understand is how mobile phones have changed our life world. In response to this question, the thesis adopts a new approach which goes beyond the traditional technological determinism. That is, based on the interrelationship of the “human-technics-world”, it proposes that the everyday technological practices always unfold in the context structured by our technics, and the structured context itself is also, at the same time, constructed reflexively by user’s technological practices.
First, the thesis indicates the structural changes brought by mobile phones as follows: (1) the “hybrid reality” emerging from the extending and mediation of mobile phones; (2) the “immediatization of time” and the “individualization of social space” resulted from the widespread use of mobile phones. Second, based on ethnomethodology, we explore how the user accomplishes the everyday “using” of the mobile phone skillfully and reflexively. The investigation shows that, for example, (1) the user, while using the mobile phone, depends upon the methods of “embodiment” and “translation”, and takes them for granted; (2) the accomplishments of the using practices actually are the products of the “cooperation” between the user and the members at the scene because the user is still “in” the present situation; (3) the using practices also show that the “individualized and immediatized connection” which emerges as the figure of our interpersonal relationship is not only due to the technical characteristics of mobile phones, but also the product of user’s skillful using practices. Third, although the thesis advocates that the everyday using practices reflexively construct the structural changes which in turn shape the practices themselves, it also attempts to point out that we still have the possibility of transgressing the given structural constraints. We explicate, by three cases, how different and multiple ways of mobile phone using are possible. These “variant practices” do not represent the opposition and the subversion of the given structure shaped by mobile phones, but indicate that we still could choose different ways of using, and different kinds of life.
王居尉（2009）。《行動通訊導論》，台北：學貫行銷。
王雪玲（1998年8月22日）。〈台灣大哥大：受話率57%，品質可考驗〉，《大成報》，14版。
吉見俊哉（2009）。《媒介文化論──給媒介學習者的15講》，蘇碩斌譯，台北：群學。
林文剛（2007）。〈緒論：媒介環境學的思想沿革初探〉，《媒介環境學：思想沿革與多維視野》，頁1-42，北京：北京大學出版社。
楊汝椿（1990年6月1日）。〈大哥大炙手可熱，今起接受認證〉，《聯合晚報》，第9版。
曹家榮、黃厚銘（2011）。〈流動的手機：液態現代性脈絡下的速度、時空與公私領域〉，「E世代重要議題──人文社會面向研討會」論文（9月15日），新竹：清華大學。
黃厚銘（2001）。《虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任》。台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。
黃厚銘（2009）。〈邁向速度存有論──即時性電子媒介時代的風險〉，《新聞學研究》，101：139-175。new window
黃貴華、李健果（1993年9月29日）。〈門號荒，大哥大限制申請〉，《聯合報》，第3版。
鍾蔚文、陳百齡、陳順孝（2006）。〈數位時代的技藝：提出一個分析架構〉，《中華傳播學刊》，10：233-264。new window
聯合報（1987年9月13日）。〈行動電話新噱頭，車上路上隨身聽〉，《聯合報》，第3版。
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker &; J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studeies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Arminen, I., &; Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy－－Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1905-1923.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z.（2007）。《液態之愛──論人際紐帶的脆弱》，何定照、高瑟濡譯，台北：商周出版。（原書Bauman, Z. [2003]. Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.）
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London: SAGE.
Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of bakelite: Toward a theory of invention. In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes &; T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 159-187). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E. (1992). The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. In W. E. Bijker &; J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studeies in sociotechnical change (pp. 75-102). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boase, J., &; Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the internet. In A. L. Vangelisti &; D. Perlman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 709-723). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, I. (2000). Michel de Certeau: Cultural theorist. London: SAGE.
Button, G., &; Sharrock, W. (1998). The organizational accountability of technological work. Social Studies of Science, 28(1), 73-102.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes &; T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 83-103). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Callon, M., &; Law, J. (1989). On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited. In L. Hargens, R. A. Jones &; A. Pickering (Eds.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of science past and present (pp. 57-83). London: JAI Press.
Campell, S. (2008). Mobile technology and the body: Apparatgeist, fashion, and function. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., &; Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities: The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. New York: SUNY Press.
Dant, T. (2005). Materiality and society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
de Gournay, C. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In J. E. Katz &; M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). Interfaces of hybrid spaces. In A. Kavoori &; N. Arceneaux (Eds.), The cell phone reader: Essays in social transformation (pp. 19-43). New York: Peter Lang.
Dodge, M., &; Kitchin, R. (2001). Mapping cyberspace. London: Routledge.
Donner, J. (2008). The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional "missed calls" on mobile phones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1-22.
Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the internet. New York: Routledge.
Ekine, S. (2010). Introduction. In S. Ekine (Ed.), SMS uprising: Mobile phone activism in Africa (pp. ix-xxii). Cape Town: Pambazuka Press.
Elliott, A., &; Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. New York: Routledge.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Ellul, J. (2008). Ideas of technology: The technological order. In F. R. (Ed.), Technology studies (Vol. 1, pp. 135-161). London: Sage.
Fortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication &; Society, 5(4), 513-528.
Fortunati, L. (2005). The mobile phone: Local and global dimension. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). What is critique? In S. Lotringer &; L. Hochroth (Eds.), The politics of truth: Michel Foucault (pp. 23-82). New York: Semiotext(e).
Gardiner, M. (2000). Critiques of everyday life. New York: Routledge.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1990). The curious seriousness of professional sociology. In B. Conein, M. d. Fornel &; L. Quéré (Eds.), Les formes de la conversation (Vol. 1, pp. 69-78). Paris: CNET.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). The central claims of Ethnomethodology: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham: Rowman &; Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giridharadas, A. (2010). Africa's gift to silicon valley: How to track a crisis. The New York Times.
Goggin, G. (2006). Cell phone culture : mobile technology in everyday life. London: Routledge.
Goldstein, J., &; Rotich, J. (2008). Digitally networked technology in Kenya's 2007-2008 post-election crisis: The Berkman Center for Internet &; Society at Harvard University.
Green, N. (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society, 18(4), 281-292.
Hahn, H. P., &; Kibora, L. (2011). The domestication of the mobile phone: Oral society and new ICT in Burkina Faso. Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(1), 87-109.
Haraway, D.（2010）。《猿猴、賽伯格和女人：重新發明自然》，張君玫譯，台北：群學。（原書Haraway, D. [1991]. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.）
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2002). Flesh and metal: Reconfiguring the mindbody in virtual environments. Configurations, 10(2), 297-320.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: From being and time to the task of thinking (pp. 306-341). New York: HarperCollins.
Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Honore, C.（2005）。《慢活》，顏湘如譯，台北：大塊文化。（原書Honore, C. [2004]. In praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed. London: Orion Books）
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. Albany: SUNY.
Ito, M. (2005). Introduction: Personal, portable, pedestrian. In M. Ito, D. Okabe &; M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Katz, J. E. (2005). Mobile communication and the transformation of daily life: The next phase of research on mobiles. In P. Glotz, S. Bertschi &; L. C. (Eds.), Thumb culture: The meaning of mobile phones for society (pp. 171-182). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Katz, J. E., &; Aakhus, M. A. (2002). Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles─a theory of Apparatgeist. In J. E. Katz &; M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York: Harvard University Press.
Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, P.（2000）。《數位麥克魯漢》，宋偉航譯，台北：貓頭鷹。（原書Levinson, p. [1999]. Digital McLuhan: A guide to the information millennium. London: Routledge.）
Levinson, P. (2004). Cellphone: The story of the world's most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone' s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Ling, R. (2008a). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 165-176). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ling, R. (2008b). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ling, R., &; Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ling, R., &; Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobiles phones in Norway. In J. E. Katz &; M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. (1999). Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory. Human Studies, 22, 211-233.
Matsuda, M. (2005). Discourses of Keitai in Japan. In M. Ito, D. Okabe &; M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 19-40). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extension of man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (2003). Global nomads in the digital veldt. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Meyrowitz, J. (2005). The rise of glocality: New senses of place and identity in the global village. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication (pp. 21-30). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Mumford, L. (1967). The myth of the machine: Technics and human development. New York: Harcourt.
Napolitano, C. M. (2010). "MXing it up": How African adolescents may affect social change through mobile phone use. New Media and Technology, 128, 105-113.
Nunes, M. (1997). What space is cyberspace? The internet and virtuality. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 163-178). London: SAGE.
Oksman, V., &; Turtiainen, J. (2004). Mobile communication as a social stage: Meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media &; Society, 6(3), 319-339.
Ong, W. J. (1988). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routeledge.
Pinch, T., &; Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes &; T. Pinch (Eds.), The social Construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17-50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Rawls, A. W. (2002). Editor's introduction. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism (pp. 1-64). Lanham: Rowman &; Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rheingold, H.（2004）。《聰明行動族－－下一場社會革命》，張逸安譯，台北：聯經。（原書Rheingold, H. [2003]. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Perseus Pub..）
Rheingold, H. (2008). Mobile media and political collective action. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 225-239). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Richardson, I. (2008). Pocket technospaces: The bodily incorporation of mobile media. In G. Goggin (Ed.), Mobile phone cultures (pp. 66-76). New York: Routledge.
Schuler, I. (2008). SMS as a tool in election observation. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 3(2), 143-157.
Schutz, A.（1992）。《舒茲論文集（第一冊）》，盧嵐蘭譯，台北：桂冠。（原書Schutz, A. [1990]. Collected papers. Vol. 1, The problem of social reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.）
Sennett, R. (1992). The fall of public man. New York: Norton.
Slouka, M.（1998）。《虛擬入侵──網際空間與科技對現實之衝擊》，張義東譯，台北：遠流。（原書Slouka, M. [1995]. War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality. New York: BasicBooks.）
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth &; G. Collins, Trans.). California: Standford University Press.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. A. (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. MIND, CULTURE, AND ACTIVITY, 7(1&;2), 4-18.
Thacker, E. (2003). Data made flesh: Biotechnology and the discourse of the posthuman. Cultural Critique, 53, 72-97.
Tomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy. London: SAGE.
Turkle, S.（1998）。《虛擬化身──網路世代的身分認同》，譚天、吳佳真譯，台北：遠流。（原書Turkle, S. [1996]. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York, NY: Simon &; Schuster）
Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/ Always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Verclas, K. (2008). A mobile voice: The use of mobile phones in citizen media: MobileActive.org.
Virilio, P. (1997). Open sky (J. Rose, Trans.). New York: Verso.
Virilio, P. (2000). Polar inertia. London: SAGE.
Virilio, P. (2007). The original accident (J. Rose, Trans.). London: Polity Press.
Wasserman, H. (2010). Mobile phones, popular media and everyday African democracy: Transmissions and transgressions. Paper presented at the Mobile Phones: The New Talking Drums of Everyday Africa?, Afrika Studiecentrum, Leiden, Netherlands.
Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 1-47). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberspace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252.
Wessels, B. (2010). Understanding the internet: A socio-cultural perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, R. (2003[1974]). Television: Technology and culture form. London: Routeledge.
Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the reactor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Winner, L. (2005). Resistance is futile: The posthuman condition and its advocates In H. W. Baillie &; T. K. Casey (Eds.), Is human nature obsolete? Genetics, bioengineering, and the future of the human condition (pp. 385-411). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：831（臺灣：822，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67586357
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上