臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公共行政學知識來源及與其相關學科互動關係之研究
作者：蔡萬助 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wan-Chu Tsai
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：圖書資訊學研究所
指導教授：黃慕萱
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2012
主題關鍵詞：知識來源；互動關係係數；互動關係類型；互動關係程度；Knowledge Originality；Factor of Interaction Relation；Type of Interaction Relation；Degree of Interaction Relation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:69
公共行政充塞著人類事務的各個領域，其複雜性使得任何單一向度的研究，都無法獲得解決問題的門徑。而學科發展必需有其土壤與養分，此種土壤與養分即成為學科的知識來源，並透過自我引用與引用的活動歷程，從而產生了學科獨立性、跨學科以及互動關係的類型與程度等問題。以往公共行政研究者鮮少對於知識來源與其互動關係加以研究。而國外公共行政學目前又呈現著多種學科、多種方法交融互動的發展情況。準此，本研究旨在瞭解公共行政學的知識來源及與其相關學科互動關係的現象。
本研究採書目計量學的引用文獻分析法，使用美國ISI公司於1997年出版之Web of Science (簡稱WOS)資料庫，以公共行政學、政治學、管理學、經濟學、社會學、法律學等六大學科領域作為研究對象；就上述學科期刊於1981—2010年所發表文章，採每五篇抽一篇的原則，共抽取10,363篇文章之465,174筆參考文獻作為分析標的。並以互動關係係數、學科領域自我引用率、學科領域引用率(Citing rate of discipline)以及 Brillouin’s Index作為測量工具。
經由研究分析，首先在知識來源部分共有九項研究結果：1.公共行政學的主要知識來源仍為社會科學；2. 公共行政學之知識來源有朝向引用自然科學的趨勢；3. 公共行政學的知識來源配合時需而變；4.公共行政學的知識來源與學科發展軌跡相互吻合；5. 公共行政學知識來源的引用序列隨著時期改變的現象仍屬穩定；6. 公共行政學屬於參考學科的定位將日趨顯著；7. 公共行政學與其相關學科具有共同交集的學科；8. 經濟學成為公共行政學與相關學科在社會科學的主要知識來源；9. 相關學科在知識來源具有不同的引用偏好。其次在公共行政學的跨學科程度與學科獨立性共有五項研究結果：1. 跨學科程度相較於相關學科來得高；2. 學科多樣性具有隨時間遞增的趨勢；3. 自我引用率亦如其他學科互有消長；4. 學科獨立性日趨下滑；5.學科獨立性與吸收能力成反比。最後在公共行政學的互動關係類型與程度方面共有四項研究結果：1.與政治學、經濟學、法律學的互動關係類型並無時期的差異；2. 互動關係類型比其他學科之變化來得多樣；3. 互動關係類型呈現出三種類型；4. 與相關學科之學科互動關係具有對稱性的特點。
由研究結果顯示，本研究亦證實了學科獨立性與學科自我引用率成正比、跨學科程度與學科自我引用率成反比、學科自我引用率日趨減少而跨學科程度日漸擴大等先期研究的結論。而本研究屬於學科有關互動關係研究之首先嘗試，尤待更多學林俊彥的共同灌溉與驗證或修正，尤其是在全球化、資訊化和網路化的推波逐瀾下，科際整合蔚為風潮，而公共行政學又出現研究方法的爭論、主體「認同危機」等問題的時候，基於最省力的原則來進行有關研究主題與課程或實務問題解決門徑之規劃與行動方案之抉擇，本研究更具有匡補拾遺的參考功能。
The Public Administration service with each category of civilization which could be resolved by an approach above mono phase of research, the development of science depends on nutrition as originality of knowledge by the self-citing process to found the types and degree of independence, interdisciplinary and interaction of science. The scholar are also seldom to have related studies nowadays, as for the foreign Public Administration presented the aspects of multi disciplines and method of interaction, therefore the goal of this study to realize the phenomenon of originality of knowledge and their interaction above.
The study adopted the approach of bibliography analysis of informetrics which cited the “Web of Science” database published on 1997 by ISI from the united states, which contains 6 branches of learning as Public Administration, Political Science, Management, Economic Science, Social Science and Law as the objects of research, and the sample was quoted each 5 for 1 article between 1981-2010 for 465, 174 reference text of 10,363 articles as the goal of analysis, the factors of interaction, self- citing rate and the citing rate of discipline with Brillouin’s Index as a tool of measurement.
According to the analysis of originality of knowledge as 9 achievements, they are following.
a. The Social Science is still the main originality of Public Administration.
b. The trend of Public Administration is citing Nature Science.
c. The originality of Public Administration variety with phases.
d. The track of originality and development of Public Administration are matched.
e. The stability of originality citing of Public Administration matched the variety of phases.
f. The position of Public Administration belongs to the reference discipline is clear.
g. The related disciplines of Public Administration to be mixed.
h. The Economic Science become the main originality to the Public Administration and related disciplines in the Social Science.
i. The different citing inertia of originality of knowledge in the related disciplines.
Secondly, there are also 5 achievements in the cross disciplines and independence to the science of Public Administration as following.
a. The degree of interdisciplinary are higher than related discipline.
b. The variety of disciplines increasing progressively with the time.
c. The rate of self-citing is adjustable as the other discipline.
d. The independence of discipline is descending with chronograph.
e. The inverse ratio of independence and absorbing ability to the discipline.
Finally, there are 4 achievements about aspects and degree to the interaction of Public Administration as following.
a. There is no difference of interaction to the Political Science, Economic Science and Law with the phases.
b. The variety of interaction is more than the other discipline.
c. There are 3 types of interaction.
d. There is symmetry within the interaction of related disciplines.
The conclusion from the achievements above which has proofed the independence of discipline and the rate of self-citing in direct proportion, and the degree of cross discipline with self-citing is inverse ratio also descending rate, the degree of cross disciplines is broaden as conclusion of forecast.
This study is also a prime attempt about related interaction of disciplines, which depends on more other scholar to modify under the trend of globalization and info mediation as a kind of integration of discipline, and this could be a easy process to resolve the disputation of research approach and subject identification, and also the reference of supplement.
Afsharpanah, S. （1984）. Interdisciplinary structure of information science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, United States—Ohio.
AI-Sabbagh, I. A. （1987）. The evolution of the interdisciplinarity of information science: a bibliometric study （PH.D.Thesis-Florida State University）. Ann Arbor, MI.: University Microfilms International.
Appleby, P. H. （1949）. Policy and Administration. AL: University of Alabama Press.
Aram, J. D. （2004）. Concepts of Interdisciplinarity. Human Relations,57（4）, 379-412.
Asimov, I. （1962）. The genetic code. New York: New American Library.
Bahm, A. J. （1980）. Interdisciplinology: The Science of Interdisciplinary Research. Nature and System, 2（1）, 29-35.
Baird, L. M., & Oppenheim C. （1994）, Do Citations Matter? JASIS, 20（1）, 2-15.
Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. （2007）. Mapping nanosciences by citation flows:a preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70（3）, 859-880.
BErner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. （2003）. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37（1）, 179 -255.
Benz, A. （2005）. Public administration science in Germany: Problema and prospects of a composite discipline. Public administration, 83（3）, 659-668.
Blessinger, K., & Frasier, M. （2007）. Analysis of a decade in library literature: 1994-2004. College and Research Libraries, 68（2）, 155-169.
Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C. （1998）. The safety of reusing ablation catheters with temperature control and the need for a validation protocol and guidelines for reprocessing, Pace-Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology, 21（12）, 2563- 2570.
Bonnevie, E. （2003）. A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science Journal:the case of the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Information Science, 29（1）, 11-23.
Borgman, C. L. （1990）. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. CA:Sage, Newbury Park.
Borgman, C. L., & Rice, R. E. （1992）. The convergence of information science and communication: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43（6）, 397-411.
Bozeman, B.（1993）. Public Management:the State of Art. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bracken, J. K., & Tucker, J. M. （1989）. Characteristics of the journal literature of bibliographic instruction. College & Research Libraries, 50, 665-673.
Branstette, L. （2000）. Vertical Keiretsu and Knowledge Spillovers in Japanese Manufacturing: An Empirical Assessment, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 14（2）, 73-104.
Brillouin, L. （1956）. Science and Information Theory. New York : Academic Press.
Broadus, R. N. （1971）. The literature of the social sciences: A survery of citation studies. International Social Science Journal, 13（2）, 236-243.
Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H. & von Ende, C. N. （1998）. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Boston : McGraw–Hill.
Brooks, T. A. （1986）. Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37（1）, 34-36.
Buttlar, L. （1999）. Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research. 21（2）, 227-245.
Cano, V. （1989）. Citation behavior: Classification, utility,and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40（4）, 284-290.
Chen, C., & Hicks, D. （2004）. Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59（2）, 199-211.
Cheung, K. F. （1990）. Interdisciplinary relationships between social work and other disciplines: A citation study. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 26（3）. Retrieved Novermber 26, 2006, from Ebscohost database.
Choi, J. M. （1988）. An analysis of authorship in anthropology journals, 1963 and 1983. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 6（3/4）, 85-94.
Cockerill, K., Daniel, L., Malczynski, L., & Tidwell,V. （2009）. A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology:collaborative modeling for more effective policy. Policy Sciences, 42（3）, 211-225.
Cole, S. （1983）. The hierarchy of the sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 89（8）, 111-139.
Cronin, B., & Pearson, S. （1990）. The exports of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16（6）, 381-391.
Cronin, B., Mckenzie, G., & Stiffler, M.（1992）. Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, 48（2）, 107-122.
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. （2008）. The Shifting Balance of Intellectual Trade in Information Studies. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59（4）, 551-564.
Culnan, M. J. （1987）. Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS,1980-1985：A co-citation analysis. Management of Information System Quarterly, 11, 341-353.
Davis, D. （1989）. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, l3, 3l9-340.
Dillon, D. （2001）. Interdisciplinary Research and Education : Preliminary Perspectives From the MIT Media Laboratory. Good Work Project Report Series, 13, Harvard University.
Dimock, M.（1980）. Law and Dynamic Administration. New York: Prageger.
Diamond, A. M.Jr. （1985）. The money value of citation to single-authored and multiple-authored articles. Scientometrics, 8（5/6）, 315-320.
Earle, P., & Vickery, B. （1969）. Social science literature use in the UK as indicated by citations. Journal of Documentation, 25（2）, 123-141.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. （1990）.Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Egghe, L. （2010）. A model showing the increase in time of the average and median reference age and the decrease in time of the Price index. Scientometrics. 82, 243–248
Etzioni, A.（1995）. New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions and Communities. Charlottesville: Virginia University Press.
Fang, M. E. （1981）. Journal rankings by citation analysis in health sciences librarianship. Bulletin of the Medicine Library Association, 77（2）, 205-211.
Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. （2005）. Theories of Information Behavior. Medham , NJ:Information Today.
Fung, M. K., & Chow, W. W. （2002）. Measuring the Intensity of Knowledge Flow with Patent Statistics. Economics Letters, 74（3）, 353-358.
Garvin, D. A. （2000）. Learning in Action :A Guide To Putting The Learning Organization To Work. Boston, M.A. :Harvard Business School Press.
Garfield, E. （1963）. Citation indexs in sociological and historical research. American Documentation, 14（4）, 289-291.
Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. （1992）. Of Nobel class: part 1 an overview of ISI studies on highly cited authors and Nobel laureates. Current Comments, 33, 116-126.
Glanzel, W., & Schoepflin, U.（1999）. A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35, 31-44.
Georgas, H., & Cullars, J. （2005）. A Citation Study of the Characteristics of the Linguistics Literature. College and Research Libraries, 66（6）, 496-515.
Glanzel, W. （2003）. Bibliometrics as a research field. Retrieved June 27, 2010 from www.norslis.net/2004/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf
Goffman, W. （1970）. Theory of communication. In Saraceviced. Introduction to information science. New York. NY: Bowker.
Goodall, G., Julien, H., Lajoie-Paquette, D., & Mckechnie, L. （2005）. How human information behaviour researchers use each other’s work: a basic citation analysis study. Information Research, 10（2）. Retrieved November 26, 2007, from http://information.net/ir/10-2/paper220.html.
Goodnow, F. J. （1990）. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Macmillan.
Grossman G. M., & Helpman E. （1991）. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35（2/3）, 517-526.
Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., & Coffey, J. （2006）. A Citation Analysis of the Evolution and State of Information Systems within a Constellation of Reference Disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 7（5）, 270-325.
Hargens, L. L. （1986）. Migration patterns of U.S.PH.D.s among disciplines and specialities. Scientometrics, 9（3/4）, 145-164.
Hall, B. H. （1985）. Collection Assessment Manual for College and University Libraries, Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
Hattery, L. H.（1979）. Interdisciplinary Research Management : Research Meets and Opportunities. in Interdisciplinary Research Groups :Their Management and Organization. Barth, R. T., Steck, R. （Eds）.University of Washington, Seattle.
Hood, Christopher（1995）. The New Public Management in the Eighties. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20 （2/3）, 93-109.
Hurd, J. M. （1992）. Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries, 53（4）, 283-297.
Ingwersen, P. （1996）. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52（1）, 3-50.
Ingwersen, P. （1998）. The Calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54（2）, 236- 243.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. （1993）. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108（3）, 577–598.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. （1996）. Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93（23）, 12671-12677.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. （1999）. International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 8（1/2）, 105–136.
Jones, C., Champman, M., & Woods, P. C. （1972）. The characteristics of the literature used by historians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 4（3）, 137-156.
Jones, P., & Merritt, Q.（1999）. Critical Thinking and Interdisciplinarity in Environmental Higher Education. Geography in Higher Education, 3, 349–358.
Julien, H., & Duggan, L. J. （2000）. A longitudinal analysis of the information needs and uses literature. Library & Information Science Research, 22（3）, 291-309.
Jun, J. S. （1986）. Public Administration:Design and Problem Solving.New York:MacMillan.
Jun, J. S.（1994）. Philosophy of Administration, Seoul Korea: Daeyoung Moonhwa International.
Kettl, D.（1996）.Governing at the Millennium. In Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd ed., edited by James L.Perry, 5-18. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Klein, J. T.（1996）. Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, Va.: University Press of Virginia.
Knievel, J. E., & Kellsey, C. （2005）. Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities fields. Library Quarterly, 75（2）, 142-168.
Kokko, H., & Sutherland, W. J. （1999）. What do impact factors tell us? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14（10）, 382-384.
Kolb, David A. （1984）. Experiential Learning : Experience As The Source of Learning & Development. Englewood Cliffs N.J. :Prentice - Hall.
Kortelainen, T. A. M. （2001）. Studying the international diffusion of a national scientific journal. Scientometrics, 51（1）, 133-146.
Karlquist, A. （1999）. Going Beyond Disciplines : The Meanings of Interdisciplinarity, Policy Sciences, 32, 379-383.
Kettl, D. F. & Milward, H. B.（1996）.The State of Public Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kilmann, R. H. et al. （eds.）（1985）.Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Kishel, D.A. （1986）. Coauthor group development among scientists involved in gravitational wave（Ph.D.thesis-Case Western Reserve University）. Ann Arbor, MI.:University Microfilms International.
Klein, J. T. （1990）. Interdisciplinary History , Theory, and Practice. Wayne State University Press Detroit.
Klein , J. T. （1996）. Crossing Boundaries : Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. （1998）. The Discourse of Interdisciplinatity. Liberal Education, 84, 23-25.
Knievel, J. E., & Kellsey, C. （2005）. Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields. The Library Quarterly, 75（2）, 142- 168.
Kortelainen, T. A. M. （2001）. Studying the international diffusion of a national scientific journal. Scientometrics, 51（1）, 133-146.
Krebs, C. J.（1985）. Ecology :The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. New York : Harps & Row Publishers Inc..
LaBonte, K. B. （2005）. Citation analysis: a method for collection development for a rapidly developing field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 43. Retrieved July 27, 2008, from http://www.istl.org/05-summer/refereed.html.
LaBorie, T., & Halperin, M. （1976）. Citation patterns in library science dissertations. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 16, 271-283.
Larivie`re, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. （2009）. The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60（4）, 858–862.
Lawani, S. M., & Bayer, A. E. （1983）. Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34（1）, 59-66.
Lynn, N. B. & Wildavsky, A. （eds.）（1990） . Public Administration: The State oj-the Discipline. NJ: Chatham House.
Leydesdorff, L., Almila, A., & Salah, A. （2010）. Maps on the Basis of the Arts ＆ Humanities Citation Index. JASIST （forthcoming）. Retrieved June 27, 2010, from http://www.leydesdorff.net/ahci/ahci.pdf.
Lewison, G., Rippon, I., & Wooding, S. （2005）. Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations. Research Evaluation, 14（1）, 5-14.
Line M. B.,& Sandison A.（1974）.Obsolescence and changes in the use of literature with time. Journal of Documentation,30（3）,283-350.
Liu, M. （1993）. Process in documentation: the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation,49（4）, 370-408.
Lockett, A., & Mcwilliams, A. （2005）. The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines, Do We Effectively Manage Knowledge？Journal of Management Inquiry, 14（2）, 139-150.
Lynn,L.E.（1998）.The New Public Management:How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy. Public Administration Review, 58（3）, 231-237
Magurran, A. E. （1988）. Ecological diversity and its measurement. London, Croom Helm.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. （1996）. Problem of citation analysis, Scientometrics, 36（3）, 435-444.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. （2010）. Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61（1）, 1–13.
March, J. G. （1965）. Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
McCain, K.W.（1990）. Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.
McSwite,O.C.（1997）. Legitimacy in Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Meho, L. I. （2007）. The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 1, 32-36.
Meyer, M. （2001）. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology. Scientometrics, 51, 163-183.
Meyer, T., & Spencer, J. （1996）. A citation analysis study of Library Science: Who cites librarians? College & Research Libraries, 57（1）, 23-33.
Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. （1985）. The application of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 8（3/4）, 177-203.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. （2001）. An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51（1）, 203-222.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. （2003）. Interdisciplinary in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54（13）, 1237-1249.
Moed, H. F. （2005）. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation.eBook: Conference publication, Springer.
Mrillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, S.（2001）. An Approach to Interdisciplinarity Through Bibliometric Indicators. Scientometrics, 51（1）, 203-222.
Nelissen, N. J. M. （1998）. Public Administration at the Edge of a New Millennium: Megatrends in the Science of Public Administration in Western Europe. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior. 1（3）, 255-279.
Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. （2008）. The Intellectual Structure of the Strategic Management Field: An Author Co-Citation Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-336.
Nonaka , I., & Takeuchi, H. （1995）. The knowledge creating company :How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noyons, E. （2001）. Bibliometric mapping of science in a science policy context. Scientometrics, 50（1）, 83-98.
OECD（1996）. The knowledge-based economy. Paris:OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation Development （1998）. Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Directorate for Science , Technology and Industry. OECD, Paris.
Oppenheim, C. （1995）. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university department. Journal of Documentation, 51（1）, 18-27.
Paisley, W. （1990）. Information science as a multi-discipline. In J.M. Pemberton and A. Prentice （Eds）. Information Science: the interdisciplinary context . New York: Neal-Schuman.
Peritz, B. C., & Bar-ilan, J. （2002）. The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics, 54（2）, 269-284.
Pielou, E. C.（1977）. Mathematical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Pierce, S. J.（1999）. Boundary Crossing in Research Literatures as a Means of Interdisciplinary Information Transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50（3）, 271-279.
Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. （2002）. Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40（2）, 483-509.
Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. （1999）. Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citationstudy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19, 7-20.
Plomp, R. （1990）. The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy. Scientometrics, 19（3/4）, 185-197.
Politt, C. （1990）. Managerialism and the Public Services: the Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. （1985）. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8（3/4）, 161-176.
Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. （2007）. Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72（1）, 117-147.
Price, D. （1965）. Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149（3683）, 510-515.
Pritchard, A. （1969）. Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics, Journal of Documentation, 25（4）, 348-349.
Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W., & Allen, B. （1997）. Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 893-916.
Qiu, L. （1992）. A Study of Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration. Research Evaluation , 2, 169-175.
Rigney, D., & Barnes, D. （1980）. Patterns of interdisciplinary citation in the social sciences. Social Science Quarterly, 61, 114-127.
Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. （2001）. Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics, 51（1）, 293-309.
Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. （2002）. Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science.
Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. （1998）. Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 27（1）, 95-107.
Rinia, E. J. （2007）. Measurement and evaluation of interdisciplinary research and knowledge transfer. Retrieved July 27, 2009 from http://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/dspace/bitstream/1887/9923/2/thesis.pdf.
Robinson, W. C. （1973）. Subject dispersion in political science: an analysis of reference appearing in the journal literature, 1910-1960. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illino is, United States—Illinois.
Rogers, E. M. （2003）. Diffusion of Innovation.The Free Press, New York.
Rosenbloom, D. H.（1998）. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics and Law. Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
Rousseau, R. （1997）. Situations: an Exploratory Study“Cybermetrics”. Retrieved July 27, 2009 from http://www.cindoc.csic.es /cybermetrics /articles /v1i1p1.html.
Rousseau, R. （2002）. Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50（3）, 418-439.
Ruben, B. D. （1990）. Redefining the boundaries of graduate education. In J. Michael Pemberton and Ann E. Prentice eds..Information science: The Interdisciplinary Context. London: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
Saracevic, T. （1970）. Introduction to information science. New York. NY: Bowker.
Schein, E. H.（1985）. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco :Jossey-Bass.
Schloegl, C., & Stock,W. G. （2004）. Impact and Relevance of LIS Journals:A Scientometric Analysis of International and German-language LIS Journals Citation Analysis Versus Reader Survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55（13）, 1155 -1168.
Schummer, J. （2004）. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59（3）, 425-465.
Serebnick, J., & Quinn, F. （1995）. Measuring Diversity of Opinion in Public Library Collections. Library Quarterly, 65（1）, 1-38.
Sen, B. K. （1992）. Documentation note:Normalized impact factor. Journal of Documentation, 48（3）, 318-325.
Sen, B. K., & Shailendra, K. （1992）. Evaluation of recent scientific research output by a bibliometric method. Scientometrics, 23（1）, 31-46.
Seglen, P. O. （1997）. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Retrieved January 6, 2009, from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497
Shafritz,J.M.; Russell,E.W.& Borick,C.P.（1997）. Introducing Public Administration. New York: Addison Wesley Long-man.
Shafritz,J.M., Russell, E.W., & Borick, C. P.（2007）. Introducting Public Administration, fifth edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Simon, H. A., Smithburg, D. & Thompson, V.（1950）.Public Administration. New York: Knopf.
Smith, L. C. （1981）. Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30（1）, 83-106.
Song, C. H. （2003）. Interdisciplinary and knowledge inflow/outflow structure among science and engineering research in Korea. Scientometrics, 58（1）, 129-141.
Steele, T. W., & Stier, J. C. （2000）. The Impact of Interdisciplinary Research in the Environmental Sciences : A Forestry Case Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51（5）, 476–484.
Stillmam, R. J. （1980）. Public Administration:Concepts and Cases. Boston: Moughton Mifflin Company.
Stoker, G.（2006）.Public Value Management:A New Narrative for Networked Governance?. American Review of Public Administration, 36（1）:41-57.
Strupp, D. C. （1997）. The Nature of Interdisciplinarity . The Association of General and Liberal Studies, 30, 97-105.
Szostak, R. （2005）. Interdisciplinarity and the teaching of public policy. Journal of policy analysis and management, 24（4）, 853-863.
Tang, R. （2004）. Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41（1）, 54-63.
The Economic and Social Research Council. ESRC Strategic Plan 2005--2010 . Retrieved June 27, 2010 from http ://www. esrc. ac.ukPESRCInfo Centre/about/strategic plan/.
Tomov, D. T., & Mutafov, H. G. （1996）. Comparative Indicators of Interdisciplinarity in Modern Science. Scientometrics, 37, 267-278.
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. （1997）. University versus corporate patents : A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5（1）, 19-50.
Tsay M. Y. （1998）. The Relationship between Journal Use in a Medical Library and Citation Use, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86 （1）, 31-39.
Turner, S. F., Bettis, R. A., & Burton, R. M. （2002）. Exploring depth versus breadth in knowledge management strategies. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 8（1）, 49-73.
Umut, A., Sahiner, M., ＆Tonta, Y. （2006）. Arts and Humanities Literature: Bibliometric Characteristics of Contributions by Turkish Authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57（8）, 1011-1022.
Urata, H. （1990）. Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18（3/4）, 309-319.
Van Raan, A. （2000）.The interdisciplinary nature of science:theoretical framework and bibliometric-empirical approach. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr（Eds.）, Practising interdiciplinarity（pp.66-78）. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Van der Besselaar P., & Heimeriks, G. （2001）. Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary. Concepts and indicators. In Davis, M. and Wilson, C. S.（Eds.）.Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics Informetrics. Sydney : University of New South Wales.
Virgo, J. A. （1977）. A statistical procedure of evaluating the importance of scientific papers. Library Quarterly, 47（4）, 415-430.
Von Bartheld, C. S. （2009）. To each citation, a Purpose. Science, 323（5910）, 36-37.
Waldo, D. （1968）. Public Administration in a Time of Revolution. Public Administration Review 28（4）, 362-368.
Wallace, S.（1978）. Premises of Public Administration: Past and Emerging. in Jay Shafritz and Albert Hyde（eds）,Classics of Public Administration.
Walter, R.（1997）. Interdisciplinarity in the History of the European University. Globe Environmental Change , 8, 177-182.
Wamsley,G.L.et al.（1990）.Refounding Public Administration.Newburry Park, CA:Sage Publications.
Wenger, E., Macdermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. （2002）. Cultivating Communities of Practice- A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Westbrook, J. H. （1960）. Identifying significant research. Science, 132 （34/35）, 1229-1234.
Wigg, K. （1997）. Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management. Long Range Planning, 30（3）, 399-405.
Wilenski,P.（1980）.Efficiency or Equity:Competing Value in Administration Reform, Policy Studies Journal, 9,1239-1249.
Wilson,W.（1887）. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2 （2）,196-223.
Yang, S. L. （2010）. An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics, 84, 1-19.
Yang, S., Ma, F., Song, Y., & Qiu, J. （2010）. A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars. Scientometrics, Retrieved July 18,2010,from http://www.springerlink.com/content/ u284q2n12304w112/fulltext.pdf
Zhou, P., Su, X., & Leydesdorff, L. （2010）. A Comparative Study on Communication Structures of Chinese Journals in the Social Sciences. Journal of The American Society For Information Science and Techology, 61（7）, 1360–1376.
何蕙菩（2008）。圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散學科之研究。未出版之碩士論文。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。new window
吳冠儀（2002）。1991-2001年海峽兩岸圖書學核心期刊論文主題及引文之分析研究。未出版之碩士論文。私立淡江大學教育資訊科學系，台北縣。
吳瓊恩（2009）。行政學。台北：三民書局股份有限公司。
金吾倫主編（1997）。跨學科研究引論。中央編譯出版社。
施孟雅（2002）。從專業期刊文獻分析我國台灣地區的圖書館學研究。台北市：漢美。
唐小荃（2005）。利用引文分析圖書館學的相關期刊。未出版之碩士論文。武漢大學圖書館學研究所，武漢市。
陳旭耀（1996）。台灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究。未出版之碩士論文。私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學系，台北縣。
陳光華、梁瓊方（2004）。臺灣圖書資訊學之跨學科交流。圖書資訊學刊，2（2），31-55。new window
張春博、王續琨、楊木（2009）。基於作者共被引的公共行政研究狀況圖譜分析---以《Public Administration Review》為研究對象。公共管理學報，6（4），38-44。
張郁蔚（2009）。以直接引用、書目耦合及共同作者探討圖書資訊學跨學科之變遷。未出版之博士論文。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。new window
張進、洪漪（1997）。圖書館學情報學博士論文（1997-2004年）調查與分析。情報學報，16（3），163-173。
張夢中、馬克、霍哲（2001）。定性研究方法總論。中國行政管理，11，24-27。
梁瓊方（2005）。台灣圖書資訊學跨學科交流之分析—以「台灣人文學引文索引資料庫」為例。未出版之碩士論文。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。new window
黃世雄（2001）。圖書資訊學期刊排序之研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC 89-2413-H-032-024），未出版。
黃毅志、洪聰敏、黃慕萱、鄭燿男（2008）。2008年國內教育學門（含體育、圖書資訊領域）期刊評比之研究。人文與社會科學簡訊，9（4），65-71。new window
黃慕萱、黃毅志（2009）。圖書資訊學期刊評比之研究。圖書資訊學研究，3（2），1-23。new window
黃慕萱（2008）。從臺灣學者引文角度看圖書資訊學期刊及學者之評鑑。圖書資訊學刊，6（1/2），1-27。new window
黃惠美（2000）。期刊文獻作者生產力與引用關係：以台灣地區圖書館與資訊科學為例。未出版之碩士論文。私立淡江大學教育資訊科學系，台北縣。
黃裕惠（2004）。分子生物與遺傳學之文獻計量分析。未出版之碩士論文。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。
經濟合作與發展組織（OECD）（1997）。以知識為基礎的經濟。北京：機械工業出版社。
鄭麗敏（1994）。近二十年來台灣地區圖書館與資訊科學期刊論文引用參考文獻特性分析。未出版之碩士論文。私立淡江大學教育資訊科學系，台北縣。new window
劉文靜（2002）。論行政法學與行政管理學的互動關係。北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版），39（3），110-117。
劉仲林、張淑林（2003）。中外「跨學科學」研究進展評析。科學學與科學技術管理，5 - 8。
譚修雯（2000）。從引文分析探討學科知識結構的可能性：以社會科學博碩士論文為例。未出版之碩士論文。私立淡江大學教育資訊科學系，台北縣。
Bacon, F. （2009）。培根論說文集（水天同譯）。北京：商務。
Hughes,Owen（2001）。公共管理導論。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
Snow, C. P. （2000）。兩種文化（林志成、劉藍玉譯）。台北市：貓頭鷹。
南博方著〔日〕（1988）。日本行政法（楊建順等譯）。北京：中國人民大學出版。
塞沃爾（2009）。連結分析:資訊科學的研究方法（孫建軍等譯）。東南大學出版社。
富永健一（1984）。經濟社會學（孫日明、楊棟樑譯）。天津：南開大學出版社。


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：574（臺灣：573，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67438113
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上