:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:早川雪:語意學與美國文化理解
作者:吳穎錫 引用關係
作者(外文):Yin-Shi Wu
校院名稱:淡江大學
系所名稱:美洲研究所博士班
指導教授:李本京
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:早川雪語意學英語學習技巧語意構圖教學法英語與西班牙語廣告S.I. HayakawaGeneral SemanticsEnglish Learning SkillsSemantic MappingEnglish-Spanish Advertisement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
美國加州參議員早川雪 (Samuel Ichiye Hayakawa) 博士,曾經擔任舊金山州立大學校長並為該校語義學教授。他對促進語義學教學的貢獻良多,並強調英語在美國社會中的重要性。在本博士論文中,筆者提出早川雪的語義學不僅影響語言學的應用,為輔助英語學習重要技巧,同時語義學解釋並能真實反應社會活動的涵義,增加。
早川雪是位國際學者,他不僅在美國,更在全世界成功推廣阿爾弗雷德·科日布斯基的非亞里士多德語言系語義學。此外還有許多學者應用早川雪的語義學進行語言學教學及英語學習技巧的研究,由此看出,早川雪在美國學術的顯著影響。事實上,早川雪的語義學須通透過字詞和字意分析文化和語言其對社會語言學的重要影響。
Samuel Ichiye Hayakawa, who was the Senator, semantics professor and ex-president of San Francisco State College in United States. He contributed greatly to the knowledge of General Semantics and addressed the importance of English in the society. In this Ph.D. thesis, the author presents the importance of Hayakawa’s semantics that affect not only the application of linguistic knowledge but also the total response to social events with true words’ meaning.
S.I. Hayakawa is an international scholar, so he promoted successfully Alfred Korzybski’s semantics of non-Aristotelian system not only in the U.S. but in the world. Moreover there many scholars who applied Hayakawa’s Semantics into their research of linguistic and English learning; it can be seen that Hayakawa has had a significant influence in U.S. academics. In fact, Hayakawa’s semantics needs to be analyzed through its linguistic applications that are related to culture and language to consider its vital influences in linguistics in society.
English Publication

Candlin, Christopher and Mercer, Neil. (2001). English Language Teaching in its
Social Context New York: Routledge

Cowie, A.P. 2009. Semantics New York: Oxford University Press.

Crawford, Yang. (1979). The Politics of Cultural Pluralism Wisconsin, Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.

Cruse, A. (2004). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and
Pragmatics
New York: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as Global Language Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press

Dale, E. and O’Rourke, J. (1976). The Living Word Vocabulary Eligin, IL: Dome,
Inc..

Hayakawa, S.I. (1941). Language in Thought and Action New York: Harcout, Brace.

----------. (1942). Language in Thought and Action (2nd ed.) NY: New York.

----------. (1946). Language in Action: A Guide to Accurate Thinking Reading &
Writing New York: Harcout, Brace.

----------. (1949). Language in Thought and Action in Consultation with Basil H.
Pillard New York: Harcout, Brace.
----------. (1963). Symbol, Status, and Personality. New York: Harcourt, Brace
&World.

----------. (1964). Language in Thought and Action in Consultation with Leo
Hamalian and Geoffrey Wagner New York: Harcout, Brace, 1964.

----------. (1969). Modern Guild to Synonym and Related Words: Lists of Antonyms,
Copious Cross-References, a Complete and Legible Index Darmstadt : Verlag Darmstadter Blatter Schwarz.

----------. (1987). Choose to Right Word: A Modern Guide to Synonyms New York:
Perennila Library.

Frominkin V., Rodman R. and Hyamis N. (2011). An Introduction to Language (9th
ed.) Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Johnson, D. D., and Pearson, P. D. (1984). Teaching Reading Vocabulary (2nd ed.).
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Johnson, D.D., Pittelman, S. D., Toms-Bronowski, S., Chu-Chang, M., Tsui, G., Yin,
M. C., Chien, C. Y., and Chin, P. (1982) Studies of Vocabulary Development
Techniques in the United States of America and the Republic of China Madison,
WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.

Johnson, D. D., Tom-Bronowski, S., & Pittelman, S. D. (1982). An Investigation of
the Effectiveness of Semantic Mapping and Semantic Feature Analysis with
Intermediate Grade Level Children Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for
Education Research, University of Wisconsin.

Johnson, K. G. (2004a). General Semantics: An Outline Survey,. Fort Worth, TX.:
Institute of General Semantics.

Nye, Joseph S. (2008). The Powers to Lead New York: Oxford University Press.

Phillipson, R. (2003). Linguistic Imperialism New York: Oxford University Press.

Pittelman, S. D. (1985). An Investigation of Two Instructional. Settings in the Use of
Semantic Mapping with Poor Readers Madison WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.

Raphael, T. E., Kirschner, B. W., and Englert, C. S. (1986). Students’ Metacognitive
Knowledge About Writing East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University,
Institute for Research on Teaching.

U.S. Government of Printing (1981), Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines and
Taiwan, A report to the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate
Washington, D.C.: GOV.

You, Y.L. (2000). Language Transfer Taipei: Crane, In the Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning.
You, Y. L., Joe, S. G. (1999). The role of Metacognitive Theory in L2 Writing: Speculations and Suggestions Taipei: Crane, In the Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching.

English Journal

Allington, R. L. (1983). The Reading Instruction Provided Readers Of Differing
Reading Abilities Elementary School Journal, 83, 548-559.

Alpert, J. L. (1975). Do Teachers Adapt Methods and Materials to Ability Groups in
Reading? California Journal of Educational Research, 26, 120-123.

Belpaeme, T. and Morse, A. Word and Category Learning in a Continuous Semantic
Domain: Comparing Cross-Situational and Interactive Learning Advances in
Complex Systems, 15 (3 & 4), 1250031-1250031-13.

Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers’ Communications of Differential
Expectations for Children’s Classroom Performance: Some Behavioral Data.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.

Chisholm, F. P. (2004) General Semantics Methodology in College English Teaching:
Report of Results in a Freshman English Course at Syracuse University ETC: A
Review of General Semantics, 51 (4), 515-526.

Claire, V. (2007) Culture Relativity: My Word Your Word Our Word ETC: A Review
of General Semantics, 64 (3), 230-234.

Durand, J. and Massey, S. D. (2000) “The Changing Geography of Mexican
Immigration to the United States: 1910-1996,”Social Science Quarterly, 81(1),
5-15.

Elton, S. C. (2004) Defining Terms or Describing Things? ETC: A Review of General
Semantics, 61 (4), 541-545.

Emodi, L. N. (2011). A Semantic Analysis of the Language of Advertising African
Research Review, 5(4). 316-326.

Fox, F. R. (1991), A Conversation with Hayakawas The English Journal, 80 (2),
36-40.

Fresh, S. H. (1999) Semantics and the Study of Ways of Life ETC: A Review of
General Semantics, 56 (2), 172-179.
Good, T. L. (1970). Which pupils do teachers call on? Elementary School Journal, 70,
190-198.

Hayakawa, S. I. (1944-45) 75th Anniversary Reprint Semantics, General Semantics:
An Attempt at Definition ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 2 (2), 202-208.

Hayakawa, S. I. (1960). How Words Change Our Lives. RT Throelsen and J, 237–
251.

Hunt, L. C., Jr. (1957). Can We Measure Specific Factors Associated with Heading
Comprehension? Journal of Educational Research, 51, 161-171.

Ives, P. (2009). Global English, Hegemony and Education: Lessons from Gramsci.
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(6), 661–683.

LEVINSON, MARTIN H. (2013) Why “General” Semantics? ETC: A Review of
General Semantics, 70 (1), 22-24.

Kulik, Chen-Lin C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982, May). Research Synthesis on Ability
Grouping Educational Leadership, 39, 619-621.

Machery, E. (2004). Semantics, Cross-cultural Style Cognition, 92(3), B1–B12.

Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues Concerning the Acquisition of Knowledge: Effects of
Vocabulary Training on Reading Comprehension. Review of Educational
Research, 53, 253-279.

Nilforoushan, S. (2012). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Semantic
Mapping on EFL Learners’ Awareness of the Affective Dimensions of Deep
Vocabulary Knowledge, English Language Teaching , 5, (10), 164-172.

Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The Effect of Background
Knowledge on Young Children’s Comprehension of Explicit and Implicit
Information Journal of Literacy Research, 11(3), 201–209.

Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations. Harvard Educational
Review, 40, 411-451.

Ryan, C. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011 American
Community Survey. US Census Bureau. Retrieved, 08–11.

Serafica, F. C. and Sigel, I. E. (1970). Styles of Categorization and Reading Disability.
Journal of Reading Behavior, 2, 105-115.

Schwartz, S. P. (1980). Formal Semantics and Natural Kind Terms. Philosophical
Studies, 38(2), 189–198.

Stockdale, S. (2000). Korzybski’s Structural Differential and Hayakawa’s Abstraction
Ladder. Retrieved January, 23, 2001.

Stockdale, S. (2008) Basic Understanding of General Semantics ETC: A Review of
General Semantics, 65 (1), 24-26.


Spearritt, D. (1972). Identification of Subskills of Reading Comprehension by
Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 92-111.

Wanderer, R. (2007). General Semantics: A Compendium of Definitions
ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 64 (3), 193-204.

West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level
Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological
Investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024–1037.


Wendell, J. (2004) After you have Studied General Semantics, ETC: A Review of
General Semantics, 51 (4), 690-691.

Wright, SR. and E. D. (2011). GENERAL SEMANTICS AS SOURCE
MATERIAL IN THE WORKS OF ROBERT A. HEINLEIN ETC: A Review of
General Semantics, 68 (1), p92-109.

Zamel, V. (1983). The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.

Chinese Publication

早川雪 (Hayakawa) ,鄧海珠譯,遠流,臺北市,民國66。
鄭樑生編著,《史學方法》,五南,臺北市,初版,民91。
趙干城、鮑世奮譯,《史學方法論》,五南,臺北市,民79。
趙干城、鮑世奮譯,《史學導論:現代歷史研究:目標、方法、新方向》,五南,
臺北市,民77。
楊豫、胡成著,《歷史學的思想和方法》,南京大學出版社出版,南京,1996。
賈東海、郭卿友主編,《史學概論》,中央民族大學出版,北京,1992。
徐浩、侯建新著,《當代西方史學流派》,昭明,臺北市,民90年。
賴建誠譯著,《年鑑學派管窺》,麥田總經銷,臺北市,民國85年。
張廣智、陳新著,《年鑑學派》,揚智出版,臺北市,民國88年。
中央硏究院美國文化硏究所編輯,美國文學與思想硏討會論文集,台北,中央硏
究院美國文化硏究所,民國73年。
全祿 (Xeno),馬丁路得今恩與民權運動,宇勗, 民國92年。
南方朔, 憤怒之愛一六○年代美國學生運動,台北,四季出板社,民國69年。
莊錫昌, 二十世紀的美國文化,台北,淑馨出版,民國85年。
葛永光, 文化多元社會中的領導 ,政治科學叢論,民國96年6月,卷32期,new window
頁1-30。

張茂椿,探索台灣廣告中之西文複合品牌,探索台灣廣告中之西文複合品牌, NSC 95-
2411-H-032-009-。


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE