Agarwal, R., & Shah, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy,43(7), 1109-1133.
Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1058-1067.
Antonelli, C. (2008). The new economics of the university: a knowledge governance approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 1-22.
AUTM, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. Annual Licensing & Activity Surveys, FY2007, FY2008, FY2009, FY2010 Survey Summaries.
Baldini, N. (2009). Implementing Bayh–Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Research Policy, 38(8), 1217-1224.
Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research policy, 35(4), 518-532.
Bercovitz, J. E., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(7), 930-948.
Booth, A. (1999). Initial conditions and miraculous growth: why is South East Asia different from Taiwan and South Korea?. World Development, 27(2), 301-321.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4), 627-655.
Bruneel, J., D’este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy,39(7), 858-868.
Chang, Y. C., Chen, M. H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific–economic’framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199-213.
Chang, Y. C., & Chen, M. N. (2011). On transformation of public sector research: A preliminary post-STBL assessment in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(3), 498-513.
Chang, Y. C., Liu, M. C., & Yang, P. Y. (2004). The changing governance of academic innovation in Taiwan: A preliminary Post-STBL review. Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, 4(3), 271-288.
Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936-946.
Chiang, L. C. (2004). The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and Taiwan. Higher Education, 48(2), 189-212.
Chu, W. W. (2009). Can Taiwan's second movers upgrade via branding?.Research Policy, 38(6), 1054-1065.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Mustar, P., & Knockaert, M. (2007). Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 609-640.
Collins, S., & Wakoh, H. (2000). Universities and technology transfer in Japan: Recent reforms in historical perspective. The journal of technology transfer,25(2), 213-222.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research policy,34(3), 321-342.
Della Malva, A., Lissoni, F., & Llerena, P. (2013). Institutional change and academic patenting: French universities and the Innovation Act of 1999.Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(1), 211-239.
D’este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339.
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research policy, 32(2), 209-227.
Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283-1295.
Eisenberg, R., (1996). Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI Review 16, 13–68.
Eom, B. Y., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: the case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy, 39(5), 625-639.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research policy, 29(2), 313-330.
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2009). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 380-402.
Forbes, N., & Wield, D. (2000). Managing R&D in technology-followers.Research Policy, 29(9), 1095-1109.
Forbes, N., & Wield, D. (2008). Innovation Dynamics in Catch‐Up Firms: Process, Product and Proprietary Capabilities for Development. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 69-92.
Freeman, C., (1995). The national innovation systems in historical perspective. Cambridge J. Econ. 19 (1).
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
Gindling, T. H., & Sun, W. (2002). Higher education planning and the wages of workers with higher education in Taiwan. Economics of Education Review,21(2), 153-169.
Göktepe-Hulten, D., & Mahagaonkar, P. (2010). Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(4), 401-423.
Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research policy, 32(4), 639-658.
Golob, E. (2006). Capturing the regional economic benefits of university technology transfer: a case study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(6), 685-695.
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821-845.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
Grimm, H. M., & Jaenicke, J. (2012). What drives patenting and commerzialisation activity at East German universities? The role of new public policy, institutional environment and individual prior knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 454-477.
Guan, J., & Zhao, Q. (2013). The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1271-1286.
Hausman, J., Hall, B., Griliches, Z., 1984. Economic models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica 52, 909–938.
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
Hill, C. W., Hitt, M. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1988). Declining US competitiveness: Reflections on a crisis. The Academy of Management Executive, 2(1), 51-60.
Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia.Research Policy, 34(9), 1322-1349.
Jacobsson, S., Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Å., & Elg, L. (2013). Is the commercialization of European academic R&D weak?—A critical assessment of a dominant belief and associated policy responses. Research Policy, 42(4), 874-885.
Jensen, R. A., Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Disclosure and licensing of University inventions:‘The best we can do with the s** t we get to work with’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1271-1300.
Jung, H., & Mah, J. S. (2014). The Role of the Government in Science and Technology Education of Korea. Science Technology & Society, 19(2), 199-227.
Kato, M., & Odagiri, H. (2012). Development of university life-science programs and university–industry joint research in Japan. Research Policy, 41(5), 939-952.
Kneller, R. (2007). The beginning of university entrepreneurship in Japan: TLOs and bioventures lead the way. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 435-456.
Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization:‘Gold’,‘ribbon’or ‘puzzle’?. Research Policy, 40(10), 1354-1368.
Law, W. W. (2004). Translating globalization and democratization into local policy: Educational reform in Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Review of Education, 50, 497-524.
Lee, J. D., & Park, C. (2006). Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea.Technovation, 26(9), 1045-1054.
Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research policy, 25(6), 843-863.
Lee, W. Y. (2000). The role of science and technology policy in Korea’s industrial development. Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrialized Economies, 269-291.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286.
Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. (2008). Academic capabilities in developing countries—A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research policy, 37(2), 276-293.
Lin, M. W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269-290.
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981-993.
Lundvall, B. Å. (1999). National business systems and national systems of innovation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 60-77.
Lundvall, B.-Å., 2001. Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion: The Danish Model. Edward Elgar, London.
Ma, Z., & Lee, Y. (2008). Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005. Technovation, 28(6), 379-390.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411-433.
Motohashi, K., & Muramatsu, S. (2012). Examining the university industry collaboration policy in Japan: Patent analysis. Technology in Society, 34(2), 149-162.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., 1995. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge J. Econ. 19 (1).
Mowery, D.C., and N. Rosenberg, 1998. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mowery, D. C. (Ed.). (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Stanford University Press.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925–1980. Industrial and corporate change, 10(3), 781-814.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 317-355.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N., 2005. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer 30(1/2), 115–127.
Mowery, D.C., Sampat, B.N., 2006. Universities in national innovation systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
Mowery, D. C., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science, 48(1), 73-89.
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayhā€“Dole act in the United States. Research Policy,31(3), 399-418.
Nelson, R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 13-19.
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons.Research policy, 33(3), 455-471.
Nelson, R., Rosenberg, N., 1993. Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 3–22.
OECD, 1997. National Innovation System. OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2000. Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy. OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2007. Science, technology and industry scoreboard 2007. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Okamuro, H., & Nishimura, J. (2013). Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 273-301.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.
Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
Park, J. B., Ryu, T. K., & Gibson, D. V. (2010). Facilitating public-to-private technology transfer through consortia: initial evidence from Korea. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 237-252.
Parker, D. D., & Zilberman, D. (1993). University technology transfers: impacts on local and US economies. Contemporary Economic Policy, 11(2), 87-99.
Parker, L. E. (1992). Industry-Universily Collaboration in Developed and Developilng Countries.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., ... & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
Peterman, A., Kourula, A., & Levitt, R. (2014). Balancing act: Government roles in an energy conservation network. Research Policy, 43(6), 1067-1082.
Rafferty, M. (2008). The Bayh–Dole Act and university research and development. Research Policy, 37(1), 29-40.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.
Ratinho, T., & Henriques, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation,30(4), 278-290.
Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92-106.
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research policy, 23(3), 323-348.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and corporate change,16(4), 691-791.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic management journal, 25(3), 201-221.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy,34(3), 305-320.
Sampat, B. N. (2006). Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy, 35(6), 772-789.
Sampat, B. N. (2009). The Bayh-Dole model in developing countries: Reflections on the Indian bill on publicly funded intellectual property. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development-Policy Brief, (5), 2009.
Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh–Dole act: a re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371-1390.
Stevens, A. J. (2004). The enactment of Bayh–Dole. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 93-99.
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management science, 48(1), 154-170.
Siegel, D. S., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). Organizational issues in university-industry technology transfer: An overview of the symposium issue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 5-11.
Siegel, D. S. (2006). Technology entrepreneurship: Institutions and agents involved in university technology transfer, Vol. 1. Edgar Elgar: London.
Siegel, D. S. (2011). The rise of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship: managerial and policy implications. In D. B. Audretsch, O. Flack, S. Heblich, & A. Lederer (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 300–315). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Siepmann, T. J. (2004). Global Exportation of the US Bayh-Dole Act, The. U. Dayton L. Rev., 30, 209.
Silverberg, G., & Verspagen, B. (2003). Breaking the waves: a Poisson regression approach to Schumpeterian clustering of basic innovations.Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(5), 671-693.
Slaughter, S. (1990). The higher learning and high technology: Dynamics of higher education policy formation. SUNY Press.
Sohn, Dong-Won, and Kenny, Martin. 2007. “Universities, clusters, innovation systems: the case of Seoul, Korea.” World Development 35(6): 991-1004
Sterzi, V. (2013). Patent quality and ownership: An analysis of UK faculty patenting. Research Policy, 42(2), 564-576.
Stevens, A. J. (2011). Innovation: lessons from UK policy. Nature, 469(7329), 162-162.
Thrane, S., Blaabjerg, S., & Møller, R. H. (2010). Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes. Research Policy, 39(7), 932-944.
Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72.
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research policy, 31(1), 109-124.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2011a). Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research?. Research Policy, 40(8), 1077-1083.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2011b). Faculty participation in licensing: implications for research. Research Policy, 40(1), 20-29.
Walsh, J. P., & Huang, H. (2014). Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists. Research Policy, 43(2), 245-260.
Washburn, J. (2008). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of higher education. Basic Books.
Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough but not too far: assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37(10), 1854-1864.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958.
Woolgar, L. (2007). New institutional policies for university–industry links in Japan. Research Policy, 36(8), 1261-1274.
Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, A. (2009). Business schools and academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 560-587.
Wu, C. Y., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy, 41(3), 524-540.
Verspagen, B. (2006). University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 607-632.
von Ledebur, S., Buenstorf, G., & Hummel, M. (2009). University patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What role did the professors' privilege play?(No. 2009, 068). Jena economic research papers.
Yang, P. Y., Chang, Y. C., & Chen, M. H. (2006). Factors nurturing academic entrepreneurship in Taiwan. Journal of Enterprising culture, 14(04), 267-290.
Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2015). How Is Ambidexterity Initiated? The Emergent Charter Definition Process. Organization Science.