臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：兩岸大學專利活動之比較研究
書刊名：商管科技季刊
作者：王美雅 引用關係／陳保秀／陳欽雨 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Mei-ya／Chen, Pao-hsiu／Chen, Chin-yeu
出版日期：2011
卷期：12:3
頁次：頁263-290
主題關鍵詞：大學專利；專利指標；產學合作；University patent；Patent indicators；University-industry collaboration
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:35
隨著兩岸往來與人才交流愈漸密切，兩岸三地大學競爭已經愈漸白熱化。在美國通過拜杜法案 (Bayh-Dole Act) 後，大學研究朝向產業化方向發展，大學所取得專利之質與量已經成為競爭力的重要指標，過去大學專利研究多數著重於單一國家調查，有關兩岸大學在專利發展方面比較仍缺乏相關研究；其次，目前產學合作的研究多從大學技術移轉的角度切入；然而，隨著兩岸企業研發能量成長，若大學能在研發或專利申請階段就與企業合作，對大學知識創造和國家整體創新都有相當助益。本研究以美國專利資料庫為基礎，檢索兩岸大學（含港、澳地區）在 2000年到 2009年底的專利獲准數和被引證數，探討兩岸大學近年來在專利發展的趨勢，並從企業與大學共同申請的專利數了解產學合作的發展狀況。研究結果發現，在專利獲准數量與質量方面，台灣大學獲准專利總數量較大陸為多，但比較其在被引證篇數、次數及對國家整體貢獻比例上，則皆低於大陸。在專利排行方面，兩岸各大學聲望排名與大學專利核准數量排名，兩者具有相當一致性；但是，台灣的專利獲准數均勻分佈於各大學間，而大陸方面則明顯較集中在少數大學；在產學合作方面，大陸大學產業合作之密切程度略高於台灣之大學。
As China and Taiwan has more and more interaction in all aspects, cross-strait universities will face fierce competition. Since the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 led the research of U.S. universities toward industrial applications, the quantity and quality of university patents have become one of the critical indicators of University competitiveness. Most research on university patents focus on single country survey, there is still no empirical data about cross-strait comparison. Furthermore, most research regards “University- Industry Collaboration” as “technology transfer”. However, as cross-strait enterprises grow in R&D capabilities, if university and industry can collaborate while they are doing R& D or applying patents, which might benefit universities and overall national innovation system. This study conducted the search and retrieval by classifying and accounting the number of patent documents and the patent citation ratio based on the database of USPTO patent from 2000 to 2009. Besides, the status of the industry-university cooperation by the patent acquisition was also explored. The results indicated that the patent granted quantity of Taiwan’s universities was higher than that of Mainland China, but the patent granted quality of Taiwan’s universities seemed to be lower than the universities in China. Moreover, the finding showed that the rank of university reputation was quite consistent with the order of universities’ patent quantity granted by US. In general, the number of patents was quite even distributed among universities in Taiwan, where in contrast, numerous patents were acquired by only a few universities in Mainland China. However, unlike Taiwan, there were close links between enterprises and universities in Mainland China.
期刊論文
1.林尚平、陳宥杉、雷漢聲、陳達仁、黃銘傑、蔡渭水、黃家齊、張克群(20090300)。行政院國科會產學合作機制之發展現況與未來建議。商管科技季刊，10(1)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張彥輝、林佩芬、翁順裕(20081200)。我國學研機構技轉單位與技轉人員之發展概況。商管科技季刊，9(4)，525-545。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Tseng, Y. -H.、Lin, C. -J.、Lin, Y. -I.(2007)。Text mining techniques for patent analysis。Information Processing and Management: An International Journal，43(5)，1216-1247。  new window
4.Lang, J. C.(2001)。Management of Intellectual Property Rights - Strategic Patenting。Journal of Intellectual Capital，2(1)，8-26。  new window
5.張元杰、陳明惠、楊宜興(20060100)。臺灣學術知識產業化的研究：「創業型大學」之機會與挑戰。科技發展政策報導，Spring，2-11。  延伸查詢new window
6.林明杰、張敬珣(20100300)。RFID發展現況：以專利分析角度探討。科技管理學刊，15(1)，25-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Chesbrough, H. W.(2003)。The Era of Open Innovation。MIT Sloan Management Review，44(3)，35-41。  new window
8.蔡孟潔、蔡達智(20071000)。大學技轉及育成中心的迷失與困境。政大智慧財產評論，5(2)，81-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王俊傑、陳達仁、黃慕萱(20071000)。從專利觀點比較臺灣與南韓技術創新能力(1987-2006)。政大智慧財產評論，5(2)，31-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳達仁(20070700)。由專利看美國大學科技創新研發能量的表現。評鑑雙月刊，8，29-35。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳達仁、黃慕萱、楊牧民(20041000)。從美國專利看臺灣企業科技創新競爭力。政大智慧財產評論，2(2)，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃慕萱、陳達仁、張瀚文(20030600)。從專利計量的觀點評估國家科技競爭力。中國圖書館學會會報，70，18-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Mowery, David C.、Nelson, Richard R.、Sampat, Bhaven N.、Ziedonis, Arvids A.(2001)。The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980。Research Policy，30(1)，99-119。  new window
14.葛孟堯、劉江彬、耿筠(20100600)。影響我國大學技術移轉績效因素之研究。科技管理學刊，15(2)，55-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Leydesdorff, L.、Meyer, M.(2010)。The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect。Scientometrics，83(2)，355-362。  new window
16.黃孝惇(20041100)。我國大學專利申請之考量。智慧財產權，71，107-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張元杰、劉孟俊、楊宜興(20040800)。The Changing Governance of Academic Innovation in Taiwan: A Preliminary Post-STBL Review。臺灣管理學刊，4(3)，271-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.耿筠、張彥輝、陳宥杉、翁順裕(2009)。我國高等教育機構技術移轉業務之調查研究。商管科技季刊，10(4)，625-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳文吟(2010)。由美國立法暨實務經驗探討專利品質對提昇產業科技之重要性。臺北大學法學論叢，74，147-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.王兆丁、李子和、夏亮輝(2002)。制約高校專利申請的因素分析及應對對策。科學學與科學技術管理，8，27-28。  延伸查詢new window
21.王娜(2009)。我國高校專利現狀、問題及對策研究。科技管理研究，29(3)，145-147。  延伸查詢new window
22.李沛錞、蘇信寧(2009)。以專利引證網絡分析探討技術發展之動態演化。科技管理學刊，14(3)，1-3。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.洪志勳(2007)。美國專利法修法趨勢及現況。科技法律透析，19(4)，14-19。  延伸查詢new window
24.倪周華(2008)。美國大學產學合作智財管理之運作。高教技職簡訊，16，8-10。  延伸查詢new window
25.徐瑛锳(2008)。產學牽手領航產業創新--強化知識創新體系發展之人才資源運用策略。高教技職簡訊電子報，16。  延伸查詢new window
26.耿筠、陳娟娟(2005)。美國大學產學合作合約條款之研究。政大智慧財產評論，3(1)，63-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.辜樹仁(2009)。想去哪裡讀大學？亞洲頂尖大學排行榜。天下雜誌，432，106-111。  延伸查詢new window
28.遠見雜誌(2010)。2010年大學入學指南。遠見雜誌，38，108-113。  延伸查詢new window
29.蔡靚萱(2010)。創業、兼職成風美國億萬教授不稀奇。財訊雜誌，337，140-141。  延伸查詢new window
30.陳達仁、耿筠(2007)。96年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果。評鑑雙月刊，15，38-42。  延伸查詢new window
31.楊健安(2010)。我國高校專利狀況研究與分析。研究與發展管理，22(5)，120-124。  延伸查詢new window
32.羅思嘉(2010)。2004-2009年國內大專校院專利活動分析。評鑑雙月刊，26，33-39。  延伸查詢new window
33.Baldini, N.(2006)。The act on inventions at public research institutions: Danish universities' patenting activity。Scientometrics，69(2)，387-407。  new window
34.Baldini, N.、Grimaldi, R.、Sobrero, M.(2006)。Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002。Research Policy，35，518-532。  new window
35.Cao, Y.、Zhao, L.、Chen, R.(2009)。Institutional structure and incentives of technology transfer: Some new evidence from Chinese universitie。Journal of Technology Management in China，4(1)，67-84。  new window
36.Grimpe, C.、Fier, H.(2010)。Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany。Journal of Technology Transfer，35(6)，637-650。  new window
37.Fine, C. R.、Castagnera, J. O.(2003)。Should there be corporate concern? Examine American University intellectual property policies。Journal of Intellectual Capitals，4(1)，49-60。  new window
38.Hoorebeek, M. V.、Marson, J.(2005)。Teaching and technology transfer as alternative revenue streams: A primer on the potential legal implications for UK universities。. International Journal of Educational Management，19(1)，36-47。  new window
39.Hou, J. L.、Lin, H. Y.(2006)。A multiple regression model for patent appraisal。Industrial Management & Data Systems，106(9)，1304-1332。  new window
40.Luan, C.、Zhou, C.、Liu, A.(2010)。Patent strategy in Chinese universities: A comparative perspective。Scientometrics，84(1)，53-63。  new window
41.MacMillan, D.、Thuna, M.(2010)。Patents under the microscope: Teaching patent searching to graduate and undergraduate students in the life sciences。Reference Services Review，38(3)，417-430。  new window
42.Malewicki, D.、Sivakumar, K.(2004)。Patent and product development strategies: A model of antecedents and consequences of patent value。European Journal of Innovation Management，7(1)，5-12。  new window
43.Mowery, D. C.、Ziedonis, A. A.(2002)。Academia patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States。Research Policy，31(3)，399-418。  new window
44.Park, K. H.、Lee, K.(2006)。Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: Analyzing Korea and Taiwan Using the US patent data。Industry and Corporate Chance，15(4)，715-753。  new window
45.Rafferty, M.(2008)。The Bayh-Dole Act and university research and development。Research Policy，37(1)，29-40。  new window
46.Sampat, Bhaven N.、Mowery, David C.、Ziedonis, Arvids A.(2003)。Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination。International Journal of Industrial Organization，21(9)，1371-1390。  new window
47.Sellenthin, M.(2009)。Technology transfer offices and university patenting in Sweden and Germany。The Journal of Technology Transfer，34(6)，603-620。  new window
48.Staresinic, M.、Boh, B.(2009)。Patent informatics: The issue of relevance in full-text patent document searches。Online Information Review，33(1)，157-172。  new window
49.Striukova, L.(2007)。Patents and corporate value creation: Theoretical approach。Journal of Intellectual Capital，8(3)，431-443。  new window
50.Taghaboni-Dutta, F.、Trappey, A. J. C.、Trappey, C. V.、Wu, H. Y.(2009)。An exploratory RFID patent analysis。Management Research News，32(12)，1163-1176。  new window
51.Zeebroeck , N. V.、de la Potterie, B. V. P.、Guellec, D.(2008)。Patents and academic research: A state of the art。Journal of Intellectual Capital，9(2)，246-263。  new window
圖書
1.Geisler, E.(2000)。The metrics of science and technology。Westport, Connecticut, London。  new window
2.Breitzman, A.(2003)。Patent and market value forecasting。International conference of the society of competitive intelligence professionals。California。  new window
其他
1.THES(2009)。World university rankings，http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/hybrid.asp?typeCode=431， 20110102。  new window
2.United States Patent and Trademark Office(2010)。Patent laws，http://www.uspto.gov/patents/， 20110102。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1187（臺灣：1155，外國：32） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1563831 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67369865
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上