|
中文文獻 張索娃(譯)。(民93)。像藝術家一樣思考(原作者:B. Edwards)。台北:時報文化。(原著出版年:1979) 周元琪(民96)。繪畫相關能力與心像認知能力之間的相關性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。 黃詩婷(民97)。心像認知能力與繪畫手法之間的相關性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
英文文獻 Al-Johany, S., AlShaafi, M., Bin-Shuwaish, M., Alshahrani, F., Alazmah, A., Aldhuwayhi, S., & AlMaflehi, N. (2011). Correlation between handwriting, drawing skills and dental skills of junior dental students. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 12(5), 327-332. Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Communications & Technology Journal, 26, 337-354. Baddeley, A. (1990). Acoustic memory and language-a citation classic commentary on short-term-memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity by baddeley, ad. Current contents/social & behavioral sciences, (20), 24-24. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 8, 47-89. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–117. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115 Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object‐spatial imagery: a new self‐report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239-263. Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied cognitive psychology, 23(5), 638-663. Calabrese, L., & Marucci, F. S. (2006). The influence of expertise level on the visuo-spatial ability: differences between experts and novices in imagery and drawing abilities. Cogn Process. 7(1), 118–20. Carson, L., & Allard, F. (2013). Angle-drawing accuracy as an objective performance-based measure of drawing expertise. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 7, 119–129. Chamberlain, R., McManus, I. C., Riley, H., Rankin, Q., & Brunswick, N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1448–1466. Cohen, D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 997–1009. Cohen, D. J., & Bennett, S. (1997). Why can't most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 609-621. Cohen, D. J., & Earls, H. (2010). Inverting an image does not improve drawing accuracy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 168-172. Cohen, D. J., & Jones, H. E. (2008). How shape con-stancy relates to drawing accuracy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 8–19. Day, R. H. (1972). The basis of perceptual constancy and perceptual illusion. Investigative Ophthalmology, 11, 525–532. Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., & Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representations. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439-462. Gillet, D., Quinton, A., & Jeannel, A. (2002). Is there a link between writing ability, drawing aptitude and manual skills of dental students? European Journal of Dental Education, 6(2), 69-73. Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and Illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Guisande, M.A., Páramo, M.F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L.S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema 19(4), p. 572-577. Hammad, S., Kennedy, J. M., Juricevic, I., & Rajani, S. (2008). Ellipses on the surface of a picture. Perception, 37, 504–510. doi:10.1068/p5840 Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689. Helmholtz, H. von (1867/1962). Treatise on Physiological Optics, vol. 3(J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B.L. (Ed.). (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. Kosslyn, S. M., & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Free Press. Kosslyn, S. M., Anderson, A. K., Hillger, L. A., & Hamilton, S. E. (1994). Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases? Neuropsychology, 8(2), 139-147. Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 705–723. Kozbelt, A., & Seeley, W. P. (2007). Integrating art historical, psychological, and neuroscientific explanations of artists' advantages in drawing and perception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 80-90. Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., ElBassiouny, A., Mark, A., & Owen, D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 93–102. Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 705–723. Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological bulletin, 133(3), 464. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer/verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & instruction, 20, 47-77. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shepard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726. Krajčíková, L., & Urbánek, T. (2014). Field independence as a spatial cognitive ability: Correlation study of verbal and spatial short term memory (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta). Levine, D. N., Warach, J., & Farah, M. J. (1985). Two visual systems in mental imagery: Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology, 35, 1010-1018. MacLeod, C. M., Jackson, R. A., & Palmer, J. (1986). On the relation between spatial ability and field dependence. Intelligence, 10(2), 141-151. McManus, C., Chamberlain, R. S., Loo, P.-K., Rankin, Q., Riley, H., & Brunswick, N. (2010). Art students who cannot draw: exploring the relations between drawing ability, visual memory, accuracy of copying, and dyslexia. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 4, 18-30. McManus, I. C., Loo, P.-W., Chamberlain, R., Riley, H., & Brunswick, N. (2011). Does shape constancy relate to drawing ability? Two failures to replicate. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29(2), pp. 191-208. Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74. Mitchell, P., Ropar, D., & Ackroyd, K. (2005). How perception impacts on drawings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 996–1003. Miyake, A., Witzki, A. H., & Emerson, M. J. (2001). Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test. Memory, 9(4-6), 445-457. Moskowitz, D. S., Dreyer, A. S., & Kronsberg, S. (1981). Preschool children's field independence: prediction from antecedent and concurrent maternal and child behavior. Perceptual and motor skills, 52(2), 607-616. Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 219-227. Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Cohen, D. J. (2015). Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 1007-1025. Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Kurylo, D. D. (2013). Perceptual grouping in artists and non-artists: A psychophysical comparison. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2, 131–143. Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Seidel, A. (2012). Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 124-136. Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., Cohen, D. J., Conklin, L., & Thomson, K. (2016). Face inversion impairs the ability to draw long-range, but not short-range, spatial relationships between features. Empirical Studies of the Arts. doi:10.1177/0276237416634851 Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Paivio, A., & Harshman, R. (1983). Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 461-483. Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Do artists see their retinas? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(171). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171 Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2013). Is artists’ perception more veridical? Frontiers in neuroscience, 7(6), 1-11. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological review, 78(5), 391. Repovš, G., & Baddeley, A. (2006). The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience, 139(1), 5-21. Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109-125. Richardson, J. A., & Turner, T. E. (2000). Field dependence revisited I: Intelligence. Educational psychology, 20(3), 255-270. Rittschof, K. A. (2010). Field dependence–independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: implications for instructional systems design and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 99-114. Seeley, W., & Kozbelt, A. (2008). Art, artists, and perception: A model for premotor contributions to perceptual analysis and form recognition. Philosophical Psychology, 21(2), 149-171. Shepard, R. (1990). Mind Sights: Original Visual Illusions, Ambiguities, and Other Anomalies. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. Tchalenko, J. (2007). Eye movements in drawing simple lines. Perception,36, 1152–1167. Tchalenko, J. (2009). Segmentation and accuracy in copying and drawing: Experts and beginners. Vision Research, 49, 791–800. Tchalenko, J., & Miall, R. C. (2009). Eye hand strategies in copying complex lines. Cortex, 45, 368–376. Tchalenko, J., Nam, S. H., Ladanga, M., & Miall, R. C. (2014). The gaze-shift strategy in drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 330. Thouless, R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object. Part I. British Journal of Psychology, 21, 339–359. Thouless, R. H. (1932). Individual differences in phenomenal regression. British Journal of Psychology, 22, 216–241. Todorovic, D. (2002). Constancies and illusions in visual perception. Psihologija, 35, 125–207. Todorovic, D. (2010). Context effects in visual perception and their explanations. Review of Psychology, 17, 17–32. Vannucci, M., Cioli, L., Chiorri, C., Grazi, A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Individual differences in visuo-spatial imagery: further evidence for the distinction between object and spatial imagers. Cognitive Processing, 7, 144-145. Waber, D. P. (1977). Biological substrates of field dependence: Implications of the sex difference. Psychological Bulletin, 84(6), 1076. Walker, C.M., Winner, E., Hetland, L., Simmons, S., & Goldsmith, L. (2011). Visual thinking: Art students have an advantage in geometric reasoning. Creative Education. 2(1), 199-202. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., &Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R. & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64. Wyttenbach, R. A. (2006). PsyCog: explorations in perception and cognition. Sinauer.
|