臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：摘要結果獲知的時近訊息−訊息量與練習量的動作表現與學習效應
作者：吳詩薇
作者(外文)：Wu, Shih-Wei
校院名稱：國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：體育學系
指導教授：卓俊伶
張至滿
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2017
主題關鍵詞：回饋；序列位置效應；結果獲知；記憶固化；feedback；serial position effect；knowledge of results；memory consolidation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
提供時近摘要結果獲知是評估學習者在動作表現與學習的影響變項。本研究旨在探討時近摘要結果獲知的訊息量與練習量的效應對於動作表現與學習的影響。實驗一與實驗二分別招募48與36名成人為實驗參加者，實驗工作為準確性的高爾夫推桿動作。實驗一針對時近SKR訊息量對動作表現與學習的影響；結果顯示中訊息量組的準確性在保留測驗顯著優於立即KR組、高訊息量與低訊息量組；中訊息量組的立即改變誤差顯著小於低訊息量組；以及在動作記憶固化的表現上，高、中、低訊息量三組皆優於立即KR組。實驗二探討在時近訊息SKR的提供下，練習量對動作表現與學習的影響。結果發現高練習量與中練習量組，無論在獲得期和保留測驗的準確性以及動作記憶固化皆顯著優於低練習量組。本研究的結論是：（一）提供中等的時近摘要結果獲知之訊息量，對動作表現的進步情形，以及動作學習的準確性與動作記憶固化有正面的影響；（二）中等的練習量有助於動作表現與學習的準確性與動作記憶固化；再者，較低的時近SKR訊息可透過較高練習量的補償，亦有助於動作表現與學習。
The provision of recent information in summary knowledge of results is a crucial variable for the assessment of the learner’s performance and learning. This study was designed to examine the impact of recent KR information amount and practice on motor performance and learning. Forty-eight and thirty-six adults served as participants in experiment I and II. Golf putting for accuracy was the experimental task. Experiment I examined the information amount in SKR on motor performance and learning. Results revealed that Mid-I group had significantly higher accuracy than that of High-I, Low-I and Immediately KR groups in retention test. Mid-I group showed significantly smaller immediate change error than Immediately KR group. Furthermore, High-I, Mid-I, and Low-I groups presented a better performance of motor memory consolidation than Immediately KR group. Experiment II was designed, under the recent information in SKR, to examine the amount of practice on motor performance and learning. The results showed that High-P and Mid-P groups had significantly superior accuracy and motor memory consolidation than Low-P group in both acquisition phase and retention test. Findings from this study suggested that (1) The provision of moderate recent information in SKR may facilitate the movement accuracy and motor memory consolidation in motor learning, and (2) Moderate practice may facilitate the movement accuracy and motor memory consolidation in motor performance and learning; Moreover, low recent information in SKR combined with higher amount of practice led to similar performance.
李宜蓓、張葶葶、洪蘭、曾志朗、李俊仁（2006）。語文記憶中項目與項目位置訊息的單一運作系統。中華心理學刊，48，315-327。new window
吳詩薇、張至滿、卓俊伶（2012）。摘要結果獲知的時間與順序安排：檢驗時近效應。大專體育學刊，14，152-160。new window
吳詩薇、張至滿、卓俊伶（2014）。口語摘要結果獲知在動作表現與學習的時近效應。大專體育學刊，16，26-36。new window
吳詩薇、張至滿、卓俊伶（2016）。摘要結果獲知的時近訊息有利於自我控制學習。大專體育學刊，18，14-26。new window
卓俊伶、林靜兒（2007）。動作學習的理念與實務應用。國民體育季刊，153，46-50。
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-149.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
Avons, S. E., & Mason, A. (1999). Effects of visual similarity on serial report and item recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 217-240.
Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
Bütefisch, C. M., Khurana, V., Kopylev, L., & Cohen, L. G. (2004). Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. Jounal of Neurophysiology, 91, 2110-2116.
Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1958). Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 379-383.
Boutin, A., Badets, A., Salesse, R. N., Fries, U., Panzer, S., & Blandin, Y. (2012). Practice makes transfer of motor skills imperfect. Psychological Research, 76, 611-625.
Carnahan, H., Vandervoort, A. A., & Swanson, L. R. (1996). The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 280-287.
Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 505-510.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40-47.
Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gable, C. D., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (1991). Summary knowledge of results. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 62, 285-292.
Gillespie, M. (2003). Summary versus every-trial knowledge of results for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 46-56.
Gleitman, H. (1996). Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.
Guadagnoli, M. A., Dornier, L., & Tandy, R. D. (1996). Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: The influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 239-248.
Guadagnoli, M. A., & Kohl, R. M. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning: Relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 217-224.
Guay, M., Salmoni, A., & Lajoie, Y. (1997). Summary knowledge of results and task processing load. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 167-171.
Guay, M., Salmoni, A., & McIlwain, J. (1992). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Beyond Lavery and Schmidt. Human Movement Science, 11, 653-673.
Guérard, K., Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., & Tremblay, S. (2010). Distinctiveness in serial memory for spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 38, 83-91.
Ho, L., & Shea, J. B. (1978). Effects of relative frequency of knowledge of results on retention of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 859-866.
Ishikura, T. (2008). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf-putting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 225-233.
Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228, 219-231.
Krakauer, J. W., & Shadmehr, R. (2006). Consolidation of motor memory. Trends in Neuroscience, 29, 58-64.
Lai, Q., Shea, C. H. (1999). The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 33-40.
Lavery, J. J. (1962). Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 300-311.
Lee, T. D., White, M. A., & Carnahan, H. (1990). On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 191-208.
Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory: A century of consolidation. Science, 287, 248-251.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Müller, N. C., Genzel, L., Konrad, B. N., Pawlowski, M., Neville, D., Fernández, G., Steiger , A., & Dresler, M. (2016). Motor skills enhance procedural memory formation and protect against age-related decline. PloS one, 11, e0157770.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1962). The serial position effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
Oliveira, D. L., Corrêa, U. C., Gimenez, R., Basso, L., & Tani, G. (2009). Relative frequency of knowledge of results and task complexity in the motor skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 831-840.
Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.new window
Pinzon, D., Vega, R., Sanchez, Y. P., & Zheng, B. (2016). Skill learning from kinesthetic feedback. The American Journal of Surgery, 1-5.
Post, P. G., Fairbrother, J. T., & Barros, J. A. (2011). Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 474-481.
Repovs, G., & Baddeley, A. (2006). The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience, 139, 5-21.
Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Miall, R. C. (2004). Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 576-582.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of result and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (2000). Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 393-415.
Schempp, P. G., & Mattsson, P. (2014). Golf: Steps to success (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
Schmidt, R. A., Lange, C., & Young, D. E. (1990). Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 325-348.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavior emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, G. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. E. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
Sidaway, B., Fairweather, M., Powell, J., & Hall, G. (1992). The acquisition and retention of a timing task: Effects of summary KR and movement time. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 328-334.
Sidaway, B., Moore, B., & Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. (1991). Summary and frequency of KR presentation effects on retention of motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 27-32.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1-29.
Van Overschelde, J. P. (2002). The influence of word frequency on recency effects in directed free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 611-615.
Vieira, M. M., Ugrinowitsch, H., Gallo, L. G., Soares Pinto Carvalho, M. F., Fonseca, M. A., & Benda, R. N. (2014). Effects of summary knowledge of results in motor skills acquisition. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 23, 9-14.
Vieira, M. M., Ugrinowitsch, H., Oliveira, F. S. Gallo, L. G., & Benda, R. N. (2012). Effects of knowledge of results (KR) frequency in the learning of a timing skill: Absolute versus relative KR frequency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115, 360-369.
Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron, 44, 121-33.
Weeks, D. L., & Sherwood, D. E. (1994). A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 136-142.
Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 677-691.
Wright, D. L., Snowden, S., & Willoughby, D. (1990). Summary KR: How much information is used from the summary? Journal of Human Movement Science, 19, 119-128.
Wulf, G., McNevin, N., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (1999). Learning phenomena: Future challenges for the dynamical systems approach to understanding the learning of complex motor skills. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30, 531-557.
Wymbs, N. F., Bastian, A. J., & Celnik, P. A. (2016). Motor skills are strengthened through reconsolidation. Current Biology, 26, 338-343.
Yao, W. X., Fischman, M. G., & Wang, Y. T. (1994). Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 273-282.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1496（臺灣：1460，外國：36） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67561949
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上