|
一、外文文獻
1. Archibugi, D. & Lundvall, B. A. (2001). The Globalizing Learning Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations. Research Evaluation, 3(1), 19-32.
3. Baldwin, W. L. (1996). The U. S. Research University and the Joint Venture: Evolution of an Institution. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(5), 629-653.
4. Blumenthal, D. (1996). Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences: An Industry Survey. The New England Journal of Medicine, 334(6), 368-373.
5. Bunders, J. F. G., Broerse, J. E. W., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (1999). The Triple Helix Enriched with the User Perspective: A View from Bangladesh. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2), 235-246.
6. Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K. & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology Spin-offs from Government R&D Laboratories and Research Universities. International Journal of Technovation, 18(1), 1-11.
7. Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of Innovation Systems: A Survey of the Literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67.
8. Chen, K. & Kenney, M. (2006). Universities/Research Institutes and Regional Innovation Systems: The Cases of Beijing and Shenzhen. World Development, 35, 1056-1074.
9. Chien, C. F. (2002). A Portfolio-Evaluation Framework for Selecting R&D Projects. R&D Management, 32(4), 359-368.
10.Chinman, M., Imm, P. & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting to Outcomes 2004: Promoting Accountability through Methods and Tools for Planning, Implementation and Evaluation. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
11.Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12.Colombo, M. G. & Delamdtro, M. (2002). How Effective are Technology Incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103-1122.
13.Cooke, P. & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantages. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5-15.
14.Cormican, K. & O’sullivan, D. (2003). A Collaborative Knowledge Management Tool for Product Innovation Management. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(1), 53-68.
15.De Chernatony, L. & Riley, F. D. (1999). Experts’ Views about Defining Services Brands and the Principles of Services Branding. Journal of Business Research, 46(2), 181-192.
16.Decrop, A. (1999). Triangulation in Qualitative Tourism Research. Tourism Management, 20(1), 157-161.
17.Dzisah J. & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple Helix Circulation: The Heart of Innovation and Development, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 101-115.
18.Epstein, M. J. & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers. Long Range Planning, 34, 585-604.
19.Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University- Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
20.Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Implications for Policy and Evaluation (Working paper), Science Policy Institute, Retrieved Nov. 2002, from http://www.sister.nu/pdf/wp_11.pdf
21.Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
22.Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry- Government Innovation in Action. New York: Rountledge.
23.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix University- Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14, 14-19.
24.Fagerberg, J. & Mowery, D. C. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation: Business and Management, Innovation, Organizational Theory and Behaviour. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199286805
25.Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
26.Gassmann, O. & Becker, B. (2006). Towards a Resource-Based View of Corporate Incubators. International Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 19-45.
27.Georghioua, L. & Roessner, D. (2000). Evaluating Technology Programs: Tools and Methods. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 657-678.
28.Godin, B. (2004). The New Economy: What the Concept Owes to the OECD. Research Policy, 33(5), 679-690.
29.Godin, B. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 17-30.
30.Godin, B. (2015). Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology: 1920 to the Present. New York City: Routlodge.
31.Grossman, J. H., Reid, P. P., & Morgan, R. P. (2001). Contributions of Academic Research to Industrial Performance in Five Industry Sectors. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 143-152.
32.Grupp, H. & Mary Mogeec, M. E. (2004). Indicators for National Science and Technology Policy: How Robust are Composite Indicators?. Research Policy, 33(9), 1373-1384.
33.Hackett, S. M. & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A Systematic Review of Business Incubator Research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55-82.
34.Hicks, D. & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does University-Industry Collaboration Adversely Affect University Research. Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 74-75.
35.Hicks, D. (1995). Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401-424.
36.Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information of Interactions in Complex Systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669-680.
37.Kunttu, L. (2017). Educational Involvement in Innovative University- Industry Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(12), 14-22.
38.Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-authorship Relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163-175.
39.Lengyel, B. & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693.
40.Lepor, B. & Reale, E. (2012). S&T Indicators as a Tool for Formative Evaluation of Research Programs. Evaluation, 18(4), 451-465.
41.Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279-286.
42.Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
43.Leydesdorff, L. & Sun, Y. (2009). National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-Industry-Government versus International Coauthorship Relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788.
44.Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The Mutual Information of University-Industry- Government Relations: An Indicator of the Triple Helix Dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467.
45.Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton. FL: Universal Publishers.
46.Lin, B. W. (2003). Technology Transfer as Technological Learning: A Source of Competitive Advantage for Firms with Limited R&D Resources. R&D Management, 33(3), 327-341.
47.Lin, L.Y., Wu, S. H. & Lin, B. S. (2008). An Empirical Study of Dynamic Capabilities Measurement on R&D Department. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 5(3), 217-240.
48.Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). A Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publications.
49.Lu, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Strategic Challenges for Creating Knowledge-Based Innovation in China: Transforming Triple Helix University-Government-Industry Relations. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 5-11.
50.Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
51.Lundvall, B. (2007). National Innovation Systems-Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Journal Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
52.Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S. & Dalum, B. (2002). National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213-231.
53.Mackay, K. (2004). Two Generations of Performance Evaluation and Management System in Australia. The World Bank, Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/03/4449429/two-generations-performance-evaluation-management-system-australia-two-generations-performance-evaluation-management-system-australia
54.Mackay, K. (2011). The Performance Framework of the Australian Government 1987 to 2011. Paris: OECD, Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/49042370.pdf
55.Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B. & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241-263.
56.Martins, E. C. & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building Organisational Culture that Stimulates Creativity and Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
57.McDaniel, B. A. (2005). A Contemporary View of Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Theory of the Entrepreneur. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(2), 485-489.
58.MERIT (1995). Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms: Results of the PACE Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations and Government Programmes. Final report, Luxembourg.
59.Meyer, M., Pereira, T. S., Persson, O. & Granstrand, O. (2004). The Scientometric World of Keith Pavitt: A Tribute to His Contributions to Research Policy and Patent Analysis. Research Policy, 33 (9), 1405-1417.
60.National Bureau of Economic Research (2012). The NBER U.S. Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/patents/
61.National Research Council (2012). Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
62.Neef, D. (1998). The Knowledge Economy (Resources for the Knowledge-Based Economy). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
63.Neij, L. & Astrand, K. (2006). Outcome Indicators for the Evaluation of Energy Policy Instruments and Technical Change. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2662-2676.
64.OECD (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-observer/volume-1996/issue-3_observer-v1996-3-en
65.OECD (1997). National Systems of Innovation. Paris: OECD publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf
66.OECD (1999a). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999 Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris: OECD publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-scoreboard-1999_sti_scoreboard-1999-en
67.OECD (1999b). The Knowledge-Based Economy: A Set of Facts and Figures. Paris: OECD publishing.
68.OECD (2001). The New Economy beyond the Hype. Paris: OECD publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/economy/growth/2380634.pdf
69.OECD (2006). Government R&D Funding and Company Behavior- Measuring Behavioural Additionality. Paris: OECD Press. Retrieved
from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/government-r-d-funding-and-company-behaviour_9789264025851-en
70.OECD (2007). Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs. Paris: OECD Press. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/sciencetechnologyandinnovationindicatorsinachangingworldrespondingtopolicyneeds.htm
71.OECD (2013). Commercialising Public Research: New Trends and Strategies. Paris: OECD publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/commercialising-public-research.htm
72.OECD (2014). STructural ANalysis Database. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/stanstructuralanalysisdatabase.htm
73.OECD (2018). Oslo Manual. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno-stats.htm#indicators
74.OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics (2018). Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/data/oecd-science-technology-and-r-d-statistics_strd-data-en
75.Okubo, Y. & Sjoberg, C. (2000). The Changing Pattern of Industrial Scientific Research Collaboration in Sweden. Research Policy, 29(1), 81-98.
76.Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433-452.
77.Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
78.Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.
79.Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
80.Safiullin, L. N., Fatkhiev, A. M. & Grigorian, K. A. (2014). The Triple Helix Model of Innovation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(18), 203-206.
81.Santoro, M. D. & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1999). Building Industry-University Research Centers: Some Strategic Considerations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), 225-244.
82.Santoro, M. D. (2000). Success Breeds Success: The Linkage between Relationship Intensity and Tangible Outcomes in Industry-University Collaborative Ventures. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255-273.
83.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard Economic Studies.
84.Sen, A. (1970). Growth Economics, Harmondsworth. England: Penguin Books.
85.Shinn, T. (2002). The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking in Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614.
86.Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University Spin- out Companies: Technology Start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 63-76.
87.Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
88.Strand, O. & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Where is Synergy Indicated in the Norwegian Innovation System? Triple-Helix Relations among Technology, Organization, and Geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 471-484.
89.Stuart, T. E. & Ding, W. W. (2006). When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144.
90.Tassey, G. (2004). Policy Issues for R&D Investment in a Knowledge- Based Economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2), 153-185.
91.Tocan, M. C. (2012). Knowledge Based Economy Assessment. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 2(5), 1-13.
92.Valentin, E. M. (2000). University-Industry Cooperation: A Framework of Benefits and Obstacles. Industry and Higher Education, 14(3), 165-172.
93.Vedovello, C. (1998). Firm’s R&D Activity and Intensity and the University-Enterprise Partnerships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(3), 215-226.
94.Vuolle, M., Lönnqvist, A. & Schiuma, G. (2014). Development of Key Performance Indicators and Impact Assessment for SHOCKs. TEKES, Retrieved from http://www.tekes.fi/Global/Ohjelmat%20ja%20palvelut/SHOK/TEMjul_27_2014_web25062014.pdf
95.WEF (2018), The Global Competitiveness Report 2018, Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitveness-report-2018
96.Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W. & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close Enough but Not Too Far: Assessing the Effects of University-Industry Research Relationships and the Rise of Academic Capitalism. Research Policy, 37(10), 1854-1864.
97.Willams, V. L., Eiseman, L. E., Landree, E. & Adamson, D. M. (2009). Demonstrating and Communicating Research Impact-Preparing NIOSH Programs for External Review. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
98.WIPO (2018), Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation, Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4330
99.Wong, J. Y., Wan, T. H. & Chen, H. C. (2018). The Innovative Grant of University-Industry-Research Cooperation: A Case Study for Taiwan’s Technology Development Programs. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(3), 316-332.
100.Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S. & Lockett, A. (2009). Academic Entrepreneurship and Business Schools. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 560-587.
101.Wu, F. S. (2001). University-Industry Research Collaboration in Chinese Taipei. Innovative Networks: Co-operation in National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD, 279-303.
102.Wu, S. H., Lin, L. Y. & Hsu, M. Y. (2007). Intellectual Capital, Dynamic Capabilities, and Innovative Performance of Organizations. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3/4), 279-296.
103.Xu, H. Y., Zeng, R. Q., Fang, S., Yue, Z. H. & Han, Z. B. (2015). Measurement Methods and Application Research of Triple Helix Model in Collaborative Innovation Management. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(2), 463-482.
104.Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Survey of the Method and Its Applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108.
105.Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E. & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge Conversion Capability and the Performance of Corporate and University Spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569-608.
二、中文文獻
1. 王偉霖（2007）。我國學術機構技術移轉機制實施成效與法律制度之檢討。科技法學評論，4（2），59-96。
2. 行政院科技會報（2014年5月8日）。行政院第6次科技會報會議新聞稿。取自：http://www.bost.ey.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=5331137415276DD6&sms=4C8F2E9B5908645D&s=0E32D39D263746A0。
3. 李羅權（2011）。我國政府科技類研究發展管理機制與成果。研考雙月刊，35（5），26-44。
4. 汪泓（2013）。中國產學合作教育的崛起。北京：清華大學出版社。
5. 林安妮（2014年6月9日）。12機關搶預算，競提4G計畫。經濟日報。取自https://paper.udn.com/udnpaper/PID0014/259883/web/。
6. 林秀英（2000）。知識經濟衡量指標建構之探討。臺灣經濟研究月刊，23（5），33-45。
7. 林良陽、吳思華、項維欣、楊燕枝（2013）。智慧資本與動態能耐對研發團隊創新績效的影響。管理評論，32（4），51-80。
8. 政府科技計畫資訊網（2015年6月28日）。105年度政府科技發展計畫概算編列暨審議作業手冊更新（104年5月28日）。取自https://gstp.stpi.narl.org.tw/index.htm#do。
9. 洪秀婉、張珈進、何真鳳（2011）。國家創新系統再審視：二階段效率分析。科技管理學刊，16（1），19-44。
10.科技部（2017）。計畫背景及目的，2019年7月4日。取自新型態產學研鏈結計畫辦公室：http://t-connectinghub.com/site/introduction。
11.科技部（2018）。如何申請，2019年7月10日。取自科技部價創計畫官網：https://www.tsi.center/introduction-of-trust-u-project/。
12.張元杰、史欽泰、簡文強、蘇千豪（2009）。國家型研發計畫評估與政策管理：以研發國際化的觀點。管理與系統，16（1），25-51。
13.張石柱、蔡正暉（2009）。經濟部科技研究發展專案計畫執行效率之探討－資料包絡分析及分析層級程序法之應用。會計學報，2（1），51-72。
14.教育部（2019）。計畫專區，2019年7月4日。取自教育部產學合作資訊網：https://www.iaci.nkfust.edu.tw/home/home.aspx。
15.許文秀、張保隆（2000）。中小企業創新模式之探討─產學合作計畫案例分析。科技管理學刊，5（1），167-187。
16.許瓊文、洪世章（2011）。科技計畫績效評估指標的剖析。科技管理學刊，16（3），29-51。
17.陳宏志（2014）。國際科研補助模式與我國經濟部科技專案之創新。科技法律透析，26（9），43-67。
18.陳志嘉（2008，6月）。企業科技創新力之指標與模式建構。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系博士論文。
19.陳信宏（2002）。我國中央層級科技績效評估體系改革架構之芻議。科技發展政策報導，6，387-404。
20.陳建仁（2012）。第九次全國科學技術會議 議題五：如何推動由上而下的科技計畫。取自科技部：http://ap0922.most.gov.tw/tc/9th/meeting.html。
21.陳智凱（2005）。知識經濟指標之信度與效度研究。管理評論，24（3），17-41。
22.陳智凱、黃恆獎（2005）。知識經濟指標之構念模型。政大智慧財產評論，3（1），131-152。
23.經濟部（2014）。預算書、決算書，2018年5月18日。取自103年度經濟部單位預算：https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/information/Information.aspx?kind=04&menu_id=139。
24.經濟部（2015）。制度調整，2015年3月26日。取自產學研價值創造計畫官網：http://ivcpa.tdp.org.tw/html/notify_detail_1.aspx?Eid=8。
25.經濟部（2017a）。申請階段表單下載，2019年7月4日。取自產學研價值創造計畫官網：http://ivcpa.tdp.org.tw/html/download_a.aspx?DFBid=1。
26.經濟部（2017b）。專利，2019年7月4日。取自產學研價值創造計畫官網：https://ivcpa.tdp.org.tw/html/kpi-patents.aspx。
27.經濟部（2018）。計畫簡介，2019年7月4日。取自產學研價值創造計畫官網：https://ivcpa.tdp.org.tw/html/about.aspx。
28.經濟部技術處（2018）。考評作業規劃與運作，2018年6月30日。取自經濟部技術處官網：https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/doit/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=22804。
29.經濟部技術處（2019）。科技專案補助資源，2019年7月10日。取自經濟部技術處官網：https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=13391。
30.萬同軒、翁振益、陳宏志、劉士豪（2015）。深化產學合作新未來－以我國學界科技專案轉型為例。產業管理評論，8（2），9-22。
31.劉靜瑀（2014年3月4日）。科發基金，擬擴大適用。工商時報。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140304000064-260202?chdtv。
32.鄧振源（2012）。多準則決策分析方法與應用。台北：鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
33.賴文祥、蔡千姿（2006）。我國當前產學合作政策發展與規劃─美、日、英、陸之經驗分析研究。取自2006工研院創新與科技管理研討會：http://dspace.lib.fcu.edu.tw/bitstream/2377/946/1/cb11iitm02006000038.pdf。
34.簡惠閔（2007）。美國大學產學合作研究發展之實施現況及其對我國之啟示。教育政策論壇，10（2），31-67。
35.簡禎富、彭金堂、許嘉裕（2013）。產學合作模式之研究－以科學工業園區固本精進產學合作計畫為例。管理與系統，20（1），27-54。
36.藍立晴（2019年5月29日）。【InnoVEX 2019】科技部TTA館展現新創能量，「億元步道」成大亮點。科技報橘。取自https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2019/05/29/tta-in-innovex-2019/。
|