臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：管理能力與組織成長之研究
作者：孔令玉
作者(外文)：Lin-Yu Kung
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：國際企業學研究所
指導教授：李吉仁
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2019
主題關鍵詞：管理能力；組織成長；高階管理團隊特質；潘若斯效應；分拆
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
關於企業高階管理團隊所應展現的管理能力，相關研究業已進行數十餘載，各式理論架構所解析的精髓，如何運用於管理實務，對於企業管理者而言，難免因各家所言相去甚遠而無所適從。尤其，創造組織成長，高階管理者必須掌握環境所出現的機會，結合內外部相關資源方能達成。因此，高階管理團隊所展現的管理能力，與組織成長著實密不可分。
有鑑於此，本論文聚焦於探討組織管理能力如何展現，以及管理能力如何影響組織成長。首先，本研究藉由回顧相關理論，釐清企業組織所屬資源與能力的本質，探討管理能力的本質與成效；進而提出由三組面向剖析高階管理團隊的特質，分別為成員組合、協調分工與激勵因素，並討論這些面向的調整，將如何影響高階管理團隊所展現的管理能力與成效。再者，依據前述三組面向，本研究分別舉出相對應的三項特質，並闡述藉由改變此三項特質，如何有助於克服組織成長過程中，因缺乏管理能力而導致成長受限的問題，亦即所謂潘若斯效應（Penrose Effect）。最後，本研究探討企業以分拆（spin-off）作為組織成長策略時，外部環境的成長機會與企業內部資源的支持，如何影響分拆後新事業體的經營績效。
透過上述三篇研究，本論文期望對於管理能力的本質，以及管理能力如何影響組織成長提出新解；並解析潘若斯效應的消長，藉以啟迪後續實證研究，延伸至更多組織成長的相關議題。此外，本論文建議企業擬以分拆作為組織發展策略時，應同時參酌內部及外部因素，並採用涵蓋新舊事業體的整體經營績效作為評估依據。
The nature of managerial competence has been studied for decades. However, different frameworks of developing managerial competences make research propositions divergent and practitioners confused when applying these concepts in creating organizational growth. Furthermore, managerial competences and environmental opportunities interact to support firms to pursue continuous growth, which necessitates the importance of managerial competences in organizational growth.
In light of the research needs, this dissertation proposes the fundamental outcomes of managerial competences and their impact on organizational growth. The first essay clarifies the nature of competence and resources. It recognizes the fundamental managerial outcomes and their relations to corporate growth and the principal dimensions of managerial teams. The next essay adopts the stated arguments to explore the relationship between managerial outcomes and the Penrose effect. The influence of collective managerial characteristics on organizational growth is then explicated. Finally, the last study focuses on spin-offs, a special mode of corporate divestiture and growth. The roles of external opportunities and internal supportive endowments in determining the spun-off firm’s performance are investigated.
The first essay provides new insight about the nature of managerial competence and its outcomes, and the managerial factors that increase the fundamental managerial outcome. It also suggests a positive relationship between the fundamental outcomes and organizational growth. By manifesting the role of entrepreneurial visions, which are the crucial outcome of managerial competences for corporate growth, the second essay sheds light on the debate of the existence of the Penrose effect and indicates a novel direction of elaborating the random rate of organizational growth. The last essay suggests that the evaluation of spin-offs requires consideration of the overall performance including the spun-off firm and the divesting firm from the internal and external perspectives when the firm intends to undertake spin-off approaches for restructuring its business or pursuing organizational growth.
Ahuja, G., & Novelli, E. 2016. Redirecting research efforts on the diversification–performance linkage: The search for synergy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 342-390.
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science, 20(2): 410-421.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Bergh, D. D., Johnson, R. A., & Dewitt, R.-L. 2008. Restructuring through spin-off or sell-off: transforming information asymmetries into financial gain. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 133-148.
Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. N.-K. 2008. Learning how to restructure: absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6): 593-616.
Brauer, M. F., & Wiersema, M. F. 2012. Industry divestiture waves: How a firm''s position influences investor returns. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1472-1492.
Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2009. Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3): 206-220.
Carton, A. M., Murphy, C., & Clark, J. R. 2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1544-1570.
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of american industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453-469.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Daley, L., Mehrotra, V., & Sivakumar, R. 1997. Corporate focus and value creation evidence from spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2): 257-281.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
Geroski, P. A. 2005. Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2): 129-138.
Gertner, R., Powers, E., & Scharfstein, D. 2002. Learning about Internal Capital Markets from Corporate Spin-offs. Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2479-2506.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2007. The Penrose effect: “Excess” expatriates in multinational enterprises. Management International Review, 47(2): 221-239.
Grant, R. M. 2002. Corporate strategy: Managing scope and strategy content. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management: chapter 4, 72-97. London, UK: Sage.
Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 16: 171-214. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334-343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193-206.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3): 63-78.
Helfat, C. E., Fankelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hite, G. L., & Owers, J. E. 1983. Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(4): 409-436.
Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. 2009. Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1): 19-46.
Ito, K. 1995. Japanese spinoffs: Unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6): 431-446.
Ito, K., & Rose, E. L. 1994. The genealogical structure of Japanese firms: Parent-subsidiary relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 35-51.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2000. Penrose''s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1): 109-139.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5): 489-496.
Kotter, J. P. 2007. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 85(1): 96-103.
Krishnaswami, S., & Subramaniam, V. 1999. Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1): 73-112.
Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1): 1-22.
Lechner, C., & Kreutzer, M. 2010. Coordinating growth initiatives in multi-unit firms. Long Range Planning, 43(1): 6-32.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. 2008. Transformational leadership''s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 557-576.
Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. 2011. Organic and Acquisitive Growth: Re-examining, Testing and Extending Penrose''s Growth Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 48-74.
López Iturriaga, F., & Martín Cruz, N. 2008. Antecedents of corporate spin-offs in Spain: A resource-based approach. Research Policy, 37(6-7): 1047-1056.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380.
Martin, J. A. 2011. Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: The role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups. Organization Science, 22(1): 118-140.
Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2010. Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2): 265-301.
Maxwell, W. F., & Rao, R. P. 2003. Do Spin-offs Expropriate Wealth from Bondholders? Journal of Finance, 58(5): 2087-2108.
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1): 91-103.
Miles, J. A., & Rosenfeld, J. D. 1983. The Effect of Voluntary Spin-off Announcements on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Finance, 38(5): 1597-1606.
Moschieri, C. 2011. The implementation and structuring of divestitures: The unit''s perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 32(4): 368-401.
Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. 2003. From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32(3): 463-481.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rubera, G., & Tellis, G. J. 2014. Spinoffs versus buyouts: Profitability of alternate routes for commercializing innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13): 2043-2052.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2002. Edith Penrose''s contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 769-780.
Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. 2004. Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6): 809-829.
Schipper, K., & Smith, A. 1983. Effects of recontracting on shareholder wealth : The case of voluntary spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(4): 437-467.
Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2011. Examining the performance effects of post spin‐off links to parent firms: Should the apron strings be cut? Strategic Management Journal, 32(10): 1083-1098.
Seward, J. K., & Walsh, J. P. 1996. The governance and control of voluntary corporate spin-offs. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 25-39.
Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science, 16(3): 259-274.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 69-84.
Slater, M. 1980. The managerial limitation to the growth of firms. Economic Journal, 90(359): 520-528.
Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2): 113-127.
Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2007. The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in U.S. industries: The Penrose effect. Management International Review, 47(2): 259-279.
Thompson, R. S. 1994. The franchise life cycle and the Penrose effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(2): 207-218.
Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2): 179-190.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476.
Vijh, A. M. 1994. The Spinoff and Merger Ex-Date Effects. Journal of Finance, 49(2): 581-609.
Villalonga, B., & McGahan, A. M. 2005. The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13): 1183-1208.
Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Daellenbach, U. S. 1992. Spin-off performance: A case of overstated expectations? Strategic Management Journal, 13(6): 433-447.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3): 339-351.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1338（臺灣：1327，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67568301
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上