:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術進步,環境品質與經濟成長
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:王銘正 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ming-cheng
出版日期:2001
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁105-116
主題關鍵詞:技術進步環保意識環境品質經濟成長Technological progressEnvironmental careEnvironmental qualityEndogenous economic growth
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
     本文建構-AK成長模型探討技術水準與環保意識的提升對環境品質與經濟成長的影響。本文將污染防治支出設定為資本性的,而非經常性的。此一設定不僅較以往的文獻更接近實際的情況,且使本文獲致以下簡潔明確的結論:污染處理技術的進步可同時提升環境品質與經濟成長;生產技術的進步雖可提升經濟成長率,但必須以環境品質惡化為代價;而社會大眾環保意識的提升,雖可改善環境品質,但不利於經濟成長;若生產技術與環保意識呈同比例的提升,則環境品質不變,但可提升經濟成長率;若環保意識相較於生產技術大幅提升,則可在經濟成長率維持不變的情況下,改善環境品質;若生產技術與污染處理技術呈同比例的提升,則前都所造成的效用水準的增加幅度大於後者。
     An AK growth model is constructed to investigate the effects of technology improvements and increased environmental care on environmental quality and economic growth. The economy accumulates capital goods which are used not only in production, but also in pollution control. The main conclusions are as follows. The progress in abatement technology cause the environmental quality to improve and the economic growth rate to rise. The progress in production technology raises the economic growth rate, but it degrades the environmental quality. The increase in environmental care causes the environmental quality to improve, but lowers the economic growth rate. If production technology and environmental care rise in the same proportion, the environmental quality does not change, but the economic growth rate can be raised. If the percentage rise in environmental care is much larger than that of production technology, the environmental quality can be improved, with the economic growth rate unaffected. The effect of progress in production technology on the utility level is larger than that of same proportional progress in abatement technology.
期刊論文
1.van Ewijk, Casper、van Wijnbergen, Sweder(1995)。Can Abatement Overcome the Conflict between Environment and Economic Growth?。De Economist,143(2),197-216。  new window
2.Bovenberg, A. L.、Smulders, S.(1995)。Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technological Change in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model。Journal of Public Economics,57(3),369-391。  new window
3.Stokey, N. L.(1998)。Are there limits to growth?。International Economic Review,39(1),1-31。  new window
4.Withagen, C.(1995)。Pollution, abatement and balanced growth。Environmental and Resource Economics,5(1),1-8。  new window
5.Smulders, S.(1995)。Environmental policy and sustainable economic growth: An endogenous growth perspective。De Economist,143(2),163-195。  new window
6.Gradus, R.、Smulders, S.(1993)。The Trade-off between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth: Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models。Journal of Economics,58(1),25-51。  new window
7.Bovenberg, A. Lans、Smulders, Sjak A.(1996)。Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model。International Economic Review,37(4),861-893。  new window
8.Huang, Chung-Huang、Cai, Deqin(1994)。Constant-returns endogenous growth with pollution control。Environmental and Resource Economics,4(4),383-400。  new window
9.Ligthart, Jenny E.、van der Ploeg, Frederick(1994)。Pollution, the Cost of Public Funds and Endogenous Growth。Economics Letters,46(4),339-349。  new window
10.李慧琳、李秉正、徐世勳、黃宗煌(1998)。提升能源使用效率之二氧化碳排放減量效果及其經濟影響評估。臺灣經濟學會年會論文集,1998,273-315。  延伸查詢new window
11.Byrne, M. M.(1997)。Is growth a dirty word? Pollution, abatement and endogenous growth。Journal of Development Economics,54,261-284。  new window
研究報告
1.陳澤義(1997)。二氧化碳排放減量對臺灣產業發展之影響及其因應對策之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉信宏(1999)。空氣污染防治與生產力-我國化學工業與鋼鐵工業之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top