:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:漢代「移病」研究
書刊名:新史學
作者:李建民 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Jianmin
出版日期:2001
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:移病稱病問疾醫療史Han politicsPolitical rhetoricHistory of illness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:58
     本文討論漢乏政治人物移病及其相關案例,即除了正常之告病假之外,尚有作病以求某些政治目的途。結論有三:第一、移病與稱疾之意相 ,即以疾病作為籍口,它們通當是官吏求退或者謙讓的婉辭。但許多移病的案例顯示,政治人物往往藉由宣稱自己有病來操控人際關係、謀圖所欲或宣洩對現況的不滿。第二、政治人物自稱為病人,不一定即得到別人的認可。特別是有是有人想假借疾病的理由免去職務或質徵召等。透過他人的問疾與否,問疾給予慰留或示言等過程之後,稱病者堅持或放棄病人的身皆。換言之,病人的界定,並不完全經由醫學的診斷,而是一種人際權力關係互動的結果。第三、漢代官垤上,不少人生生以病夫的形象出現其生病與否往往反映了個人勻途的浮沉。以病不非事、不上朝,多半出現在一個人官運不順遂的時候。另一方面,政治人物以病夫的形象示人以無爭寡慾,事實上卻藏匿強烈的企圖心。這對了解漢代政治的運作生態,以及中國人的行為模式無疑是一條重要的線索。
     This essay discusses the use of illness as a political tool in Han China, focusing in particular on cases of yibing 移病("illness as excuse") chengbing 稱病 ("proclaiming illness"), polite phrases used by ministers who asked for retirement from or deferment of official posts. The large number of such cases shows that political figures often used illness to control interpersonal relationships, or to publicize their dissatisfaction with the status quo. Not everyone condoned the use of illness as an excuse to avoid summons or to quit their jobs, and expressions of condolences or warning during visits to the "patient" could lead the "recuperating official" to recover his health overnight. Personal relationships and power interactions, not medical analysis, determined whether or not one was "ill". Physical health often reflected the highs (healthy) and lows (sick) in an official career. Not a few ministers were "in poor health" throughout their official careers. Other political figures used the mask of the "sick man" to portray themselves as non-competitive, unassuming types in order to hide their driving ambitions. In sum, an appreciation of the rhetoric of illness in Han politics helps us to understand both the place of illness in Han official culture and the patterns of social interaction at that time.
期刊論文
1.廖伯源(19940600)。漢官休假雜考。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,65(2),221-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.阮芝生(19810500)。論留侯與三略。食貨月刊,11(2),54-71。  延伸查詢new window
3.王子今(1994)。論中國傳統政治形態的內在封閉性。中國社會科學季刊,9。  延伸查詢new window
4.程如海(1991)。詐病考。中華醫史雜誌,2,86-87。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林宗義、Kleinman Arthur、柯永河、蕭欣義(1990)。文化與行為--古今華人的正常與不正常行為。香港:香港中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張蔭麟(1944)。東漢前中國史綱。重慶。  延伸查詢new window
3.甘肅省文物考古研究所(1990)。居延新簡。北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.孟軻、沈文倬、焦循(1988)。孟子正義。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.大庭脩、林劍鳴(1991)。秦漢法制史研究。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.安作璋、熊鐵基(1984)。秦漢官制史稿。齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.孫星衍、周天游(1990)。漢官六種。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.李均明(1998)。簡牘文書稿本四則。簡帛研究(第3輯)。  延伸查詢new window
9.高大倫(1997)。居延漢簡中所見疾病和病病文書考述。簡牘學研究(第2輯)。  延伸查詢new window
10.廖伯源(1994)。漢代官吏休假、宿舍若干問題之辨析。中國史學(第4卷)。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1978)。後漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(南宋)朱熹(1986)。四書章句集注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(東漢)班固(1975)。漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.西嶋定生、李開元(1993)。武帝之死。日本學者研究中國史論著選譯(第三卷:上古秦漢)。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE