:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐代官人的父母喪制--以〈假寧令〉「諸喪解官」條為中心
書刊名:法制史研究
作者:羅彤華 引用關係
作者(外文):Lo, Tung-hwa
出版日期:2009
卷期:16
頁次:頁91-123
主題關鍵詞:唐代假寧令解官心喪喪假Tang dynastyTiansheng statutesLeave statutesOfficial post removalInner-heart mourning systemFuneral leave
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:364
  • 點閱點閱:51
唐〈假寧令〉「諸喪解官」條在規範官人遭父母喪時的解官、心喪、給假問題。解官與心喪不須並行,解官期間要嚴守喪禮的各項規範,心喪則雖可釋去凶服,但仍有一些生活與公務禁忌。唐代的「諸喪解官」條,是自漢晉南北朝以來不斷地試行、調整才逐步演變來的。但該條令文的諸多細節,又隨著唐政府的歷次修令而做了更動,尤其是龍朔二年蕭嗣業嫡繼母改嫁案的影響最大。《開元二十五年令》合理修正了《永徽令》、《開元七年令》的一些規定,如三年齊斬只解官、不心喪;只為生己的出母、嫁母解官並心喪,凡非生己的諸母則既不解官,也不心喪。唐政府為方便官人辦理父母喪事,還給予三十日的喪假。從唐律設匿喪、詐喪專條來看,「諸喪解官」條在唐代是很認真地被執行著。
The Statute of Official Post Removal Due to Parent Death included in Leave Statutes was regulated to solve the issues of giving funeral leaves including official post removal, and an inner-heart mourning system that bears great grief in the heart but does not wear mourning clothes. Official post removal and the foresaid mourning system were not necessarily processed simultaneously. A variety of funeral rules were strictly followed during the official post removal period. Although the mourning system did not require wearing mourning clothes while having great grief, there were still some prohibitions in daily life and official affairs. The Statute of Official Post Removal Due to Parent Death applied in the Tang Dynasty was the one continually tried, adjusted and evolved from Wei, Jin, North and South Dynasties. Many details of the Statute had been revised several times during the Tang Regime, with the case of the death of Xiao Si-Ye’s stepmother in 662 A.D. giving the most impact. Some regulations in the Statutes of the 25th Year of Kaiyuan Period had been modified from the Statutes of Yong Hui and the Statutes of the 7th Year of Kaiyuan Period. For example, according to the three-year mourning period for the death of a parent, only official posts were removed, but the inner-heart mourning system was not required. Officials’ post removal was only applied for the death of the biological mother, who may have been divorced by the father or have remarried. However, for the death of the non-biological mother, both official post removal and the inner-heart mourning system were not required. The Tang regime authorized their officials 30 days of funeral leave to tend to parents’ funeral. With regards to Tang Codes specifically regulated for hiding or cheating of the parent funeral, it seems that the Statute of Official Post Removal Due to Parent Death was thoroughly enforced in the Tang Dynasty.
期刊論文
1.吳麗娛(2006)。從《天聖令》對唐令的修改看唐宋制度之變遷--《喪葬令》研讀筆記三篇。唐研究,2006(12),137。  延伸查詢new window
2.岡野誠(2008)。天聖令依拠唐令の年次について。法史學研究會會報,13,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃正建(2007)。《天聖令》附《唐令》是開元二十五年令嗎?。中國史研究,2007(4),90。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧向前(2007)。新材料、新問題與新潮流--關於隋唐五代制度史研究的幾點看法。史學月刊,2007(7),11-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.皮慶生(2008)。唐宋時期五服制度入令過程試探--以《喪葬令》所附《喪葬年月》為中心。唐研究,2008(14),389-394。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙克生(2006)。明代文官匿喪與詐喪現象探析。東北師大學報(哲社版),2006(2),155-156。  延伸查詢new window
7.趙大瑩(2006)。唐宋《假寧令》研究。唐研究,12,73-99。  延伸查詢new window
8.池田溫(1996)。唐日喪葬令の一考察--條文排列の相異爲中心として。法制史研究,45,59。  延伸查詢new window
9.高明士(2008)。唐代禮律規範下的婦女地位--以武則天時期為例。文史,2008(4),121-129。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蕭嵩(1972)。大唐開元禮。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬建興(2005)。服喪制度與傳統法律文化。北京:知識產權出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳戍國(2002)。中國禮制史.魏晉南北朝卷。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊樹達(200704)。漢代婚喪禮俗考。上海市:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳戍國(1998)。中國禮制史.隋唐五代卷。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.黒板勝美(1989)。令義解。東京:吉川弘文館。  延伸查詢new window
7.張鷟、趙守儼(1997)。朝野僉載。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.李斌城、李錦綉、張澤咸、吳麗娛、凍國棟(1998)。隋唐五代社會生活史。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.長孫無忌、劉俊文(1993)。唐律疏議。北京:中華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.宋敏求(1972)。唐大詔令集。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.丁鼎(2003)。〈儀禮.喪服〉考論。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.趙和平(1993)。敦煌寫本書儀研究。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.丁凌華(2000)。中國喪服制度史。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭雅如(2001)。情感與制度:魏晉時代的母子關係。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.廖宜方(2009)。唐代的母子關係。新北:稻鄉出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.廖伯源(2003)。漢官休假雜考。秦漢史論叢。台北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.仁井田陞、栗勁(1989)。假寧令。唐令拾遺。長春:長春出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴建國(2008)。從《天聖令》所附唐令為開元二十五年令考。唐研究。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.稲田奈津子(2002)。喪葬令と礼の受容。日中律令制の諸相。東京:東方書店。  延伸查詢new window
5.范曄(1975)。陳忠傳。後漢書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.范曄(1975)。陰識傳。後漢書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.范曄(1975)。循吏.劉矩傳。後漢書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.范曄(1975)。陳蕃傳。後漢書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.范曄(1975)。劉愷傳。後漢書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.班固(1986)。揚雄傳。漢書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.房玄齡(1979)。武帝紀。晉書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.房玄齡(1979)。禮志中。晉書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.房玄齡(1979)。殷仲堪傳。晉書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.杜佑(1988)。禮.凶禮十一。通典。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.徐乾學(1983)。喪期.心喪下。讀禮通考。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.房玄齡(1979)。傅咸傳。晉書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.魏徵(1979)。禮儀三。隋書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.魏收(1975)。禮志四。魏書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.魏徵(1979)。誠節.劉子翊傳。隋書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.王溥(1974)。服紀上。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉昫(1976)。禮儀七。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.王欽若(1972)。掌禮部.奏議。冊府元龜。台北:台灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.劉昫(1976)。劉祥道傅。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.杜佑(1988)。職官.秩品五。通典。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.歐陽修、宋祁(1976)。宗室世系上。新唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.王曉麗(1999)。唐五代擬制血親研究。中國社會歷史評論。  延伸查詢new window
27.王溥(1974)。軍雜錄。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.王溥(1974)。奪情。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.蕭嵩(1972)。凶禮.五服制度。大唐開元禮。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
30.王溥(1974)。左降官及流人。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.王永興(1993)。敦煌唐代差科簿考釋。陳門問學叢稿。南昌:江西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.西村元佑(1968)。唐代敦煌差科簿を通じてみた均田制時代の徭役制度--大谷探檢隊將來、敦煌.吐魯番古文書を參考史料として。中國經濟史研究.均田制度篇。京都:京都大學東洋史研究會。  延伸查詢new window
33.王溥(1974)。租税上。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
34.王溥(1974)。休假。唐會要。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
35.劉昫(1976)。職官一。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
36.吳麗娛(2006)。唐喪葬令復原研究。天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證附唐令復原研究。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE