資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.222.104.196)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Measuring the Economic Benefits from Recreation by Using the Mixed Logit Model
書刊名:
農業經濟半年刊
作者:
曾偉君
作者(外文):
Tseng, Wei-chun
出版日期:
2001
卷期:
70
頁次:
頁149-175
主題關鍵詞:
綜合隨機效用模型
;
羅吉
;
經濟福利
;
可變參數
;
資源經濟
;
環境
;
Mixed logit model
;
Conditional logit
;
Welfare
;
Random parameter
;
Resource economics
;
Environment quality
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:26
間斷反應模型(discrete response models)被廣泛應用在資源管理,交通研究,商品選擇,以及休閒研究等許多領域。其中,綜合隨機效用模型(the mixed logit model)饒富趣味,因為它相當有彈性(flexible)。它可以逼近所有基於效用極大化(random utility maximizing)之間斷反應模型,它也可以刻化消費者之隨機異質性偏好(random heterogeneous preference),此為其他模型所無之優點。 休閒研究的最終的目的,通常是對休憩地點之增減,或環境品質之改變,的經濟價值之衡量。以綜合隨機效用模型估計休閒需求時,對於經濟福利效果的計算,乃新興之學術主題。目前有兩種方式:第一個方式將隨機項視為偏好差異;第二個方式將隨機項視為衡量之誤差。僅有的少數文獻以實證顯示,第一個方式所得之效益值總是顯著大於第二個方式所得之效益值。本研究以不同之實證資料,在較多個遊憩地點,及較多種機率分配組合下,發現對隨機項之解釋,有時候顯著影響以綜合隨機效用模型所得到之經濟價值。本研究亦首度發現,第一個方式所得之效益值並非總是大於第二個方式所得之效益值。 此外,本研究亦以實證舉例,當使用綜合隨機效用模型估計休閒需求,而且旅遊成本(travel cost)的參數是可變參數時,第一個方式所得到之經濟價值會產生嚴重誤差。第一個方式之變形,則無此缺陷。這些貢獻,幫助人們對綜合隨機效用模型之瞭解。特別是如何使用此模型來衡量遊憩之經濟價值。因此,本研究有助於此模型在休閒研究,自然資源管理,以及其他領域之應用。
以文找文
Discrete response models have been applied to many fields such as resource management, transportation studies, commodity brand studies, and recreation studies. The mixed logit model (MXL) is interesting because it is flexible, in a sense that it is a generalization of all discrete response models based on random utility maximization. The MXL can capture the random heterogeneous preference of the consumers, which is its unique strength among discrete response models. Typically, the ultimate goal of recreation studies is to obtain economic benefits related to changing site attributes or availability. The literature states that the welfare effects obtained by using the MXL are significantly affected by the interpretation of its random terms. One interpretation denotes the randomness as capturing taste differences among the consumers; another denotes the random terms as capturing measurement errors. The literature finds that the welfare effects the welfare effects based on the first interpretation are all substantially larger than those the welfare effects based on the second interpretation. This study uses a different data set. With more sites and under more distributions of the random parameters, I find that the interpretation of its random terms sometimes significantly affects the welfare effects. However, the welfare effects based on the first interpretation is not always larger than the welfare effects based on the second interpretation. This study also uses empirical data to illustrate that, when the travel cost is a random parameter, the welfare effects based on the first interpretation is significantly biased. A third formula based on the same interpretation is appropriate. These findings help understanding the welfare measurement when using the MXL. Therefore, it helps the application of the MXL in the study of natural recreational resource management as well as in other fields.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Train, K. E.(1998)。Recreation demand models with taste differences over people。Land Economics,74(2),230-239。
2.
Bockstael, N. E.、Hanemann, W. M.、Kling, C. L.(1987)。Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework。Water Resources Research,23(5),951-960。
3.
Breffle, W. S.、Morey, E. R.(2000)。Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete-choice recreation demand model of Atlantic salmon fishing。Marine Resource Economics,15,1-20。
4.
McFadden, Daniel、Train, Kenneth E.(2000)。Mixed MNL models for discrete response。Journal of Applied Econometrics,15(5),447-470。
5.
Revelt, David、Train, Kenneth(1998)。Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level。The Review of Economics and Statistics,80(4),647-657。
6.
McConnell, K. E.、Tseng, W.(1999)。Some Preliminary Evidence on Sampling of Alternatives with Random Parameters Logit。Marine Resource Economics,14(4),317-332。
會議論文
1.
McFadden, D.(2000)。Disaggregate Behavioral Travel Demand's RUM Side: A 30-Year Retrospective。Gold Coast, Australia。1-42。
研究報告
1.
Hanemann, W. Michael(1982)。Applied welfare analysis with qualitative response models。University of California, Agricultural and Resource Economics。
2.
Bhat, C.(1996)。Quasi-random simulated maximum likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial Logit model。Austin:Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas。
3.
Train, K. E.(1999)。Halton draws for Mixed Logit。Berkley:Department of Economics, University of California。
4.
Herriges, J. A.、Phaneuf, D. J.(2000)。Controlling for Correlation across Choice Occasions and Sites in a Repeated Mixed Logit Model of Recreation Demand。0。
5.
Hicks, R.、Strand, I. E.(1999)。The extent of Information and its relevance for Recreation Evaluation。0。
6.
Train, K. E.、Revelt, D.(1999)。Consumer-specific Taste Parameter and Mixed Logit。0。
圖書
1.
Evans, M.、Hastings, N.、Peacock, B.(1993)。Statistical Distributions。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
2.
Hanemann, W. M.(1999)。Welfare Analysis with Discrete Choice Models。Valuing Recreation and the environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice。Aldershot, UK。
圖書論文
1.
McFadden, D. L.(1978)。Modelling the Choice of Residential Location。Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models。Amsterdam:North-Holland Publishing Company。
2.
Train, K. E.(1999)。Mixed Logit models for recreation demand。Valuing Recreation and the environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice。Aldershot:Edward Elgar。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
休閒農場消費者滿意度與重遊意願之探討--以走馬瀨農場為例
2.
臺灣國家公園之遊憩效益及其物種多樣性之價值
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code