:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教育發展中的政府作用--財政學思考
書刊名:教育學報
作者:雷萬鵬鍾宇平
作者(外文):Lei, WanpengChung, Yue-ping
出版日期:2002
卷期:30:1
頁次:頁41-61
主題關鍵詞:教育發展經濟學教育財政學
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
政府在教育發展中應該發揮怎樣的作用?本文從經濟學和教育財政學的角度分析了政府干預教育的理由、方式與效果。結果顯示:政府與市場各有其行動邊界。政府干預教育的理據,主要規限在提供公共物品、維護社會公平和校正市場失靈這些範圍內。在這些範圍以外,政府應避免干預,留下空間,讓市場作出調節和發揮其促進效率的功能。各國發展的實踐研究表明,政府在教育發展上因角色錯位導致對教育「干預過多」或「干預不夠」的現象比比皆是,尤以發展中國家為甚。究竟政府應在哪些領域內及何種情況下「退出」干預,或「進入」以承擔應負的責任?這些都是急需探索的教育發展研究課題。就中國內地的教育而言,政府角色轉換還有很長一段路要走。
What is the role of government/state in the development of education? This article analyzes the justification, strategy and impact of government intervention on education from the perspectives of economics and finance of education. The analysis shows that there is an intersecting boundary between government intervention and market operation. Government intervention should be limited to the provision of public goods, the protection of equality, and the adjustment for market failures. Outside these boundaries, government should refrain from intervention and allow market forces to operate and exert their positive effects on efficiency. A study of education development in various countries reveals that in most cases, government has exerted either too much or not enough intervention in education, especially in developing countries. In which areas and under what conditions a government should “retreat” or “enter” are important and urgent research topics in education development. In the case of Mainland China, the change in the role of government in education still has a long way to go.
期刊論文
1.Hanushek, E. A.(1997)。Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,19(2),141-164。  new window
2.鍾宇平(2000)。全球一體化與市場化下的高等教育發展。江蘇高教,2000(2),3-7。  延伸查詢new window
3.鍾宇平、雷萬鵬(2002)。公平視野下中國基礎教育財政政策。教育與經濟,2002(1),1-7。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hanushek, E. A.(1997)。Outcomes, incentives, and beliefs: Reflections on analysis of the economics of schools。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,19(4),301-308。  new window
5.Tsang, M. C.(1988)。Cost analysis for educational policymaking: A review of cost studies in education in developing countries。Review of Educational Research,58(2),181-230。  new window
6.Tsang, M. C.(1997)。Cost analysis for improved educational policymaking and evaluation。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,19(4),318-324。  new window
7.Ziderman, A.(2002)。Financing student loans in Thailand: Revolving fund or open-ended commitment。Economics of Education Review,21(4),367-380。  new window
8.Hanson, E. Mark(1998)。Strategies of educational decentralization: Key questions and core issues。Journal of Educational Administration,36(2),111-128。  new window
9.Schultz, Theodore W.(1961)。Investment in Human Capital。American Economic Review,51(1),1-17。  new window
圖書
1.Blaug, Mark(1997)。Economic Theory in Retrospect。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Buchanan, J. M.、Musgrave, R. A.(1999)。Public Finance and Public Choice: two contrasting visions of the State。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
3.World Bank(1986)。Financing education in developing countries: An exploration of policy options。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
4.Musgrave, Richard A.、Musgrave, Peggy B.(1980)。Public Finance in Theory and Practice。New York:McGraw-Hill Co.。  new window
5.Stiglitz, J. E.(2000)。Economics of the public sector。New York, NY:W. W. Norton。  new window
6.Murphy, J.、Gilmer, S. W.、Weise, Richard、Page, Ann(1998)。Pathways to privatization in education。Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
7.Levin, H. M.、McEwan, P. J.(2001)。Cost-effectiveness analysis。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
8.布坎南(1992)。民主過程中的財政:財政制度與個人選擇。上海:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.陸根書、鍾宇平(2002)。高等教育成本回收的理論與實證分析。北京:北京師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.鍾宇平(1997)。教育產出與優質教育:一個經濟學的分析。香港:香港中文大學香港教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.Buchanan, J. M.、Flowers, M. R.(1975)。The public finances: An introductory textbook。Homewood, IL:Richard D. Irwin。  new window
12.Patrinos, H. A.、Ariasingam, D. L.(1997)。Decentralization of education: Demand- side financing。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
13.Rosen, Harvey S.(1995)。Public Finance。Richard D. Irwin。  new window
14.Friedman, Milton、Friedman, R.(1962)。Capitalism and Freedom。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Odden, A. R.、Picus, L. O.(2000)。School finance: a policy perspective。Boston, MA。  new window
16.Berne, R.、Stiefel, L.(1984)。The measurement of equity in school finance。Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press。  new window
17.World Bank(1994)。Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
其他
1.楊東平(2001)。2000年中國教育發展報告,http://www.edu.cn/20010823/207349.shtml, 2003/02/15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Benson, C. S.(1995)。Educational financing。International encyclopedia of economics of education。Oxford, UK:Tarrytown, NY:Pergamon。  new window
2.Levin, H. M.(1987)。Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis。Evaluation practice in review。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Khursheed, A. F.、Borcherding, T. E.(1998)。Organizing government supply: The role of bureaucracy。Handbook of public finance。New York:Marcel Dekker。  new window
4.Musgrave, R. A.(2000)。Who should tax, where and what?。Public finance in a democratic society。Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar。  new window
5.Riaz, M. N.(2000)。Education systems in an ideological state: Major issues and concerns in Pakistan。Education in a global society: A comparative perspective。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
6.Berne, Robert、Stiefel, Leanna(1999)。Concepts of school finance equity: 1970 to the present。Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives。Washington, DC:The National Academies Press。  new window
7.Hanushek, E. A.(1993)。Can equity be separated from efficiency in school finance debates?。Essays on the economics of education。Kalamazoo, MI:W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research。  new window
8.Hanushek, E. A.(1996)。School resources and student performance: Earnings-Quality relationship。Does money matter?: The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success。Washington, D. C.:The Brookings Institution。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top