:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由「超炫3D立體鏡」的創製探索兒童科學專題的學習歷程
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類
作者:張政義熊召弟 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Cheng-iHsiung, Chao-ti
出版日期:2003
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁213-255
主題關鍵詞:科學專題科學探究光學概念Light conceptsProject-based learningScience projectsScience investigation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:14
     本研究主要是藉四名小學高年級學生製作「超炫3D立體鏡」科學作品的探究歷程,來呈現科學專題研究歷程的教育意義與價值。本研究蒐集實地觀察的場記、非正式晤談和師生對話的錄音帶轉譯以及學生的札記、實驗計畫與作品說明書等文件,做為分析的資料。研究發現:(一)在觀察現象階段,學生以「問題為中心」融合舊經驗,創塑目的性的循環學習模式,主動建構專題探究的流程,發展出科學社群的雛型;(二)在實驗研究過程階段,學生藉由「問題因子」的發展策略;(三)在實驗研究整理階段,學生利用學習遷移呈現出研究結果,並由脈絡抽離化的實驗活動歸納各項結果的原則性,形成結論,成為科學知識的邁構者。學生交織運用高層次的規則,歸納出與問題解決技能的相關結果,因此依「學習者為中心」的主動建構的探究經驗,不僅可以呈現科學專題作品的教育意涵,並可提供科學教學多元化發展方向之參考。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate the journey through the science project entitled "Super-Cool 3-D stereoscopic mirror" designed and produced by four primary students. Data were collected by field notes written from on-the-spot observations, the transcripts taken from the interviews as well as the dialogue among the teacher and students, students' journals, recording on the lab sheets, final project and other documents. Findings showed that: (1)during the initial observational stage, the students integrated prior experience by taking the problem as the central part for investigation, creating the purposeful learning cycle model, and developing a miniature of scientific community; (2)during the investigation stage, the students developed the final research questions via the frequent cross-checks by the "question organizers". The cross-type thinking model provided the strategies for solving problems and the foundation for extra-curricular learning; (3)during the data analysis stage, the students exerted their efforts to describe precisely with words, charts, symbols, and the interpretation for the images through red/blue glasses interlocking function which influenced the parallax. However, the principles as well as the conclusions of stereoscopic phenomena were inducted from the so-called "context-free" experimental activities. The exploratory journey showed that the four students could operate the higher-order thinking skills, such as the induction and problem-solving skills, and then actively constructed the investigation procedures based on the "learner-centered" rationale. The study not only demonstrated the educational meaning for science fair, but also could provide a reference for children's multi-dimensional development.
期刊論文
1.郭金美(19991100)。建構主義教學方法--影響學童光學概念學習教學模式的研究。嘉義師院學報,13,157-202。  延伸查詢new window
2.Atkins, L. S.(1999)。Listening to student。Teaching Children Mathematics,5(5),289-295。  new window
3.Parnes, S. J.(1977)。CPSI: The gerneral system。Journal of Creative Behavior,11,1-6。  new window
4.Wheatley, G. H.(1991)。Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning。Science Education,75(1),9-21。  new window
5.Driver, R.、Oldham, V.(1986)。A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science。Studies in Science Education,13(1),105-122。  new window
會議論文
1.江新合(1992)。建構主義式教學策略在國小自然科教學的應用模式。國小自然科學教育學術研討會,3-20。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾振富(2000)。利用網路科技輔助國小自然科「教」與「學」之研究:以台北市中正河濱公園自然生態為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.張俊紳(1987)。教師發問內容的技巧對學生科學態度及科學過程的影響(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林宏恩(1990)。高中高職學生不同問題解決能力與其生活適應之差異比較研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.翁玉華(1998)。問題解決能力與科學過程技能之相關探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.簡惠燕(2000)。國小學童在科學問題解決過程中創造力與後設認知之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mintzes, Joel J.、黃台珠(2002)。促進理解之科學教學--人本建構取向觀點。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2002)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明清(1996)。教育研究。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.王美芬、熊召弟(1996)。國民小學自然科教材教法。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.林珮璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育上的運用--質的研究方法。嘉義:中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭有遹(1987)。如何培養科技的創造。台北:國立台灣科學教育館。  延伸查詢new window
7.熊召弟(2002)。科學學習心理學。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bruner, J. S.、Gill, Anita(1973)。The relevance of education。New York:Norton。  new window
9.Duffy, T. M.、Lowyck, J.、Jonassen, D. H.(1993)。Designing environment for constructive learning。Springer-Verlag。  new window
10.Treffinger, D. J.、Isaksen, S. G.(1992)。Creative problem solving: an introduction。Center for Creative Learning。  new window
11.鍾聖校(1999)。自然與科技課程教材教法。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Ausubel, David P.、Novak, Joseph D.、Hanesian, Helen(1978)。Educational psychology: A cognitive view。New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
13.Roth, W. M.(1998)。Designing communities。London:Kluwer Academic Publisher。  new window
14.皮連生、邵瑞珍(1989)。教育心理學。五南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊佩芬(1999)。從建構主義理論學習理論探討超媒體在在教學上的運用。資訊與網路教學應用。台北市政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Roy, R.(2000)。Real science education: replacing "PCB" with science through STS throughout all levels of K-12 "materials" as one approach。Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice。New York:Kluwer academic:Plenum Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE