:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:資料包絡分析在高級中學教育監控指標系統之應用
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:吳政達 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Cheng-ta
出版日期:2004
卷期:50:2
頁次:頁119-145
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡分析監控指標系統效率決策單位Data envelopment analysisMonitoring indicator systemsEfficiencyDecision-making unit
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
資料包絡分析(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)對高級中學教育監控指標系統的主要應用,在於利用實際可觀察到的投入產出資料,在不需預設生產函數的形式下,求取各決策單位(Decision Making Unit, DMU)生產效率的比較值。此不僅可用於單一投入及單一產出的傳統比率分析,亦可用於多項投入與多項產出的複雜狀況。本研究以教育部研究委員會87學年度高級中學現況調查資料進行公立高中職教育監控實證分析,主要發現如下: 1.全國公立高中職學校的整體效率分析達到相對有效率的學校共34所,為全部學校的16.19%。 2.全國公立高中職學校具有技術效率的學校共66所,為全部學校的31.43%。 3.全國公立高中職學校具有規模效率的學校共37所,為全部學校的17.62%。 4.參考集合分析則針對有效率學校進一步區辨其效率排名,由排名來看,公立高中學校普遍比公立高職學校表現優異。 5.無效率的公立高中職在整體效率與技術效率方面須做改善的項目,在產出項主要為升學率以及中途輟學率;投入項,以資本門優先。
In order to know the comparative value of the output efficiency of each decision-making unit without calculating output function, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of senior high and vocational school monitoring indicator systems must use the observable input and output data. Such an analysis not only serves the purposes of the traditional analysis of single input and output; it also fits the complex conditions of multiple input and output. Using data from the Ministry of Education for the 1998 academic year, this study conducted an empirical analysis of educational monitoring systems in public senior high and vocational schools in Taiwan. The main findings are as follows: 1. About 34 schools achieved a relative degree efficiency; these comprised 16.19% of all public senior high and vocational schools; 2. About 66 schools (comprising 31.43% of all public senior high and vocational schools) achieved technical efficiency; 3. About 37 schools (17.62%) achieved scale efficiency; 4. In general, public senior high schools were more efficient than public vocational schools; 5. If inefficient public senior high and vocational schools wanted to achieve greater over-all efficiency, the output items needing to be first improved were promotion rate (65.88%) and dropout rate (30.74%).
期刊論文
1.Anderson, L.、Walberg, H. J.、Weinstein, T.(1998)。Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of Chicago public elementary school: 1989, 1991, 1993。Journal of Educational Administration Quarterly,34(4),484-504。  new window
2.Bessent, A.、Bessent, W.、Kennington, J.、Reagan, B.(1982)。An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District。Journal of Management Science,28(12),1355-1367。  new window
3.Kirjavainen, Tanja、Loikkanen, Heikki A.(1998)。Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and tobit analysis。Economics of Education Review,17(4),377-394。  new window
4.Ray, S. C.(1991)。Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of connecticut data。Management Science,37(12),1620-1628。  new window
5.Doyle, J.、Green, R.(1993)。Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making。Omega: International Journal Of Management Science,21(6),713-715。  new window
6.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
7.Odden, A.(1990)。Educational Indicators in the United States: The Need for Analysis。Educational Researcher,19(5),24-29。  new window
8.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
9.Fare, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Weber, W. L.(1989)。Measuring School District Performance。Public Finance Quarterly,17(4),409-429。  new window
10.Johnson, J. R.、Bob, L.(199901)。The politics of research: Information use in the education policy arena。Educational Policy,13(1),23-36。  new window
學位論文
1.Engert, Frank Michael(1995)。A Study of School District Efficiency in New York State Using Data Envelopment Analysis,New York, NY。  new window
2.Zomorrodian, Mohammad Reza(1990)。Guidelines for Improving Efficiency in Elementary Schools in Western Massachusetts: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach,MA。  new window
圖書
1.Fitz-Gibbon, C. T.(1996)。Monitoring education: indicator, quality and effectiveness。London:Cassell。  new window
2.Willms, J. D.(1992)。Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators.。Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators。London, UK:The Falmer Press。  new window
3.Johnstone, J. N.(1981)。Indicators of Education System。Paris:UNESCO。  new window
4.Oakes, Jeannie(1986)。Educational indicators: A guide for policymakers。New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Policy Research in Education。  new window
5.Shavelson, R.、Mcdonnell, L.、Oakes, J.、Carey, N.、Picus, L.(1987)。Indicator systems for monitoring mathematics and science education。Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation。  new window
6.Husen, T.、Tuijnman, A. C.(1994)。Monitoring standards in education: Why and how it came about。Monitoring the Standards of Education。New York, NY。  new window
7.Postlethwaite, T. N.(1994)。Monitoring and evaluation in different systems。Monitoring the Standards of Education。New York, NY。  new window
8.Windham, D. M.、Chapman, D. W.、Walberg, H. J.(1990)。Evaluation of Educational Efficiency: Constraints, Issues, and Policies。Evaluation of Educational Efficiency: Constraints, Issues, and Policies。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Bessent, A.,Bessent, W.,Kennington, J.,Reagan, B.(1981)。A fractional programming model for determining the efficiency of decision making units,沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top