:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Students' and Instructors' Perceptions of Ability Grouping in English Listerning Learning
書刊名:長榮大學學報
作者:陳美華林憶秋馮秀珍
作者(外文):Chen, Mei-huaLin, Yi-chiuFeng, Hsiu-chen
出版日期:2004
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁107-123
主題關鍵詞:聽力分級教材教法問卷調查Listening ability groupingQuestionnaireTeaching materials and teaching methodology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
本研究探討學生對英文聽力課程分級上課所持之態度。613位文藻外語學院五專部二年級之同學經由聽力測驗以三種不同的程度分組上課。透過問卷調查及訪問,學生及任課教師表達其對分組上課的看法,及對教材教法的意見。問卷結果以單因子變異數分析及測後比較來統計。此外,訪問所有任教聽力的七位教師,及隨機從每班挑選兩位在實施分組前後聽力成績明顯進步30分的學生共24位,613位學生中有16位學生分組前後聽力測驗分數沒進步也同時受訪,以進一步瞭解他們對聽力分級上課優缺點的看法是否與問卷結果一致。結果顯示超過半數以上的同學贊成聽力分級上課之政策,雖然他們寧願選擇在原班級上課。在訪談中,受訪同學對分級上課是否能增加其學習動機及減輕學習壓力持保留態度,然而同樣的也贊成分級之政策。七位任課老師當中,任教程度最高及程度較差者較贊成該項政策。
This study explored students’ and instructors’ perceptions of ability grouping in English listening learning program. Six hundred and thirteen second year students of the five-year junior college program of Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages were placed in three different level classes based on their listening proficiency test scores. A questionnaire was administered concerning participants’ opinions towards ability grouping preference, policy, appropriateness of materials used and instruction approaches in the listening program. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons were used to analyze the data. In addition, seven teachers who taught the 12 classes of listening course were interviewed. Meanwhile 26 students who were randomly selected from the 12 classes and improved the listening proficiency over 30 points on CSEPT test in a year were interviewed. Sixteen students out of 613 students who made no progress were interviewed as well. The purpose of the interview meant to find out if the interview results corresponded with those of the questionnaire. Questionnaire Results indicated that more than half of the respondents favored the ability grouping policy though affectively they preferred staying in their original classes. The interviewees were more reserved when asked if ability grouping increased their learning motivation and decreased their learning anxiety, but they also approved of the policy. Among the seven teachers, those who taught the highest and the lowest levels of students showed more favorable reactions to the policy.
期刊論文
1.Ireson, J.、Hallam, S.(2008)。Raising standards: is ability grouping the answer?。Oxford Review of Education,25(3),344-360。  new window
2.Marsh, Herbert W.(1994)。Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to Evaluate Theoretical Models of Self-Concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(3),439-456。  new window
3.Gamoran, Adam、Nystrand, Martin、Berends, Mark、LePore, Paul C.(1995)。An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping。American Educational Research Journal,32(4),687-715。  new window
4.Boaler, J.、William, D.、Brown, M.(2000)。Students' experiences of ability grouping--disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure。British Educational Research Journal,26(5),631-648。  new window
5.Marsh, Herbert W.(1991)。Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels。American Educational Research Journal,28(2),445-480。  new window
6.Chen, M.、Lee, B.。Setting the graduation English language proficiency benchmarks in Wenzao Ursuline college of languages。Language, Literary Studies and International Studies: an International Journal。  new window
7.Lou, Y.、Abrami, P. C.(2000)。Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: an exploratory model。The Journal of Education Research,94,101-112。  new window
8.Wheelock、Hawley(1993)。What next? Promoting alternative to ability grouping。Journal of Intergroup Relation,20,65-74。  new window
9.Wong, M. S. W.、Watkins, D.(2001)。Self-esteem and ability grouping: a Hong Kong investigation of the Big fish Little Pond Effect。Educational Psychology,21,79-87。  new window
10.Slavin, Robert E.(1990)。Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis。Review of Educational Research,60(3),471-499。  new window
11.Hallinan, Maureen T.(1994)。Tracking: From Theory to Practice。Sociology of Education,67(2),79-84。  new window
會議論文
1.錢景甯、荊行倫、高麗華(2002)。英文能力分班政策實證研究。2002年全國應用英語教學研討會暨工作坊。台灣銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yu, C. F.(1994)。The assessment of ability grouping in the college lab program: The Soochow experience。The third International symposium on English teaching。Taipei:Crane。191-224。  new window
3.Tsai, M. C.、Lin, H. C.、Wu, Y. M.(2000)。The effects of placement on the students' learning of listening and speaking skills。The foreign languages teaching and humanity education symposium,Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages 。Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages。  new window
圖書
1.Helgesen, M.(1994)。Active listening: Building skills for understandin。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Language Training and Testing Center(1990)。Grade reports on the College Students English Proficiency Test for Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages。Taipei, Taiwan:Language Training and Testing Center。  new window
3.Language Training and Testing Center(2000)。Grade reports on the College Students English Proficiency Test for Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages。Taipei, Taiwan:Language Training and Testing Center。  new window
4.Language Training and Testing Center(2001)。Introduction of College Students English Proficiency Test (CSEPT)。Taipei, Taiwan:Language Training and Testing Center。  new window
5.Richards, J. C.、Gordon D.、Harper, A.(1995)。Listen for it: A task-based listening course。Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gardner, R. C.(1990)。Attitudes, motivation, and personality as predictors of success in foreign language learning。Language Aptitude Reconsidered。NJ:Prentice Hall Regents。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE