:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:幼兒閱讀及敘說故事之後設認知探究
書刊名:臺北市立師範學院學報. 教育類
作者:趙金婷
作者(外文):Chou, Jing-ting
出版日期:2005
卷期:36:1
頁次:頁273-299
主題關鍵詞:後設認知萌發讀寫萌發幼兒Emergent metacognitionLiteracy emergentYoung children
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:141
     有效的學習有賴成功的認知運作,因此「後設認知」激起研究者的興趣以來,已有相當豐碩的研成果。然而探討幼兒後設認知歷程之研究仍然很少,本研究旨在探討幼兒與敘說故事能力相關的後設認知之萌發。 本研究檢視幼兒敘說故事時,所萌發的後設認知,研究對象為40名來自幼稚園5-6歲的幼兒,先要求受試者「假裝閱讀」一本最喜歡的故事書,依其閱讀行為區分為三種閱讀程度,並進一步要求受試?經由口述生活經驗,再進一步轉換為書面故事的過程,由研究者詼錄其敘述的故事,隨後以故事的品質、後設認知分敗為依變項,說讀程度、年齡等因素為自變項,探討其的關係。質的皆析方面,則分析幼兒後設認知思考的品質,以探討幼兒後設認知的萌發情形。 本研究發現,大多數幼兒已萌發出後設認知能力,不同閱讀萌發程度幼兒僅在故事品質上有顯著差異,此外,後設認知能力與建構的文章品質之間有正向關係。但由於本研究取樣的幼兒人數較少,具選取語文能力較佳者,因此,本研究的結論不宜外推。
     Effective learning depends on successful cognitive implementation. Educators long have been interested in metacognitive researchers and gained more insights about this area, but few researches focused on young children. This study aimed at exploring young children’s literacy-related metacognitive emergent. The study examined young children’s emergent literacy-related metacognition during the construction of meaning. Participants were 40 preschoolers from kindergartens. Each child was asked to pretend reading his favorite storybook and then divided their reading level by Cox’s model. Then asked each child engage in a literacy task of constructing an “autonomous” text for other children to read. The scribe write their oral discourse. Then analyze the autonomous texts by their holistic quality, identify and quantify metacognitive utterances surrounding the texts. Statistics analysis the correlation of textual quality and metacognitive score, and metacognitive score between different reading level and age by ANOVA and t-test. The qualitative analysis is also implemented. The results revealed these preschoolers were already developing emergent metacognition. There was a significant emergent reading level effect on both metacognition and textual quality, but the age level was not gain the effect. This study also found that there was a significant relationship between metacognition and the quality of the dictated text. Limitations and implications of the study are also discussed.
期刊論文
1.Sulzby, Elizabeth(1985)。Children's Emergent Reading of Favorite Storybooks: A Developmental Study。Reading Research Quarterly,20(4),458-481。  new window
2.Lin, X.(2001)。Designing metacognitive activities。Educational Technology Research and Development,49(2),23-40。  new window
3.Harris, David P.、Trezise, J.(1999)。"Duckville" and other tales。Language Arts,76(5),371-376。  new window
4.Gordon, C.(1990)。Changes in readers' and writers' metacognitive knowledge: Some observations。Reading Research and Instruction,30(1),1-14。  new window
5.Dyson, A. H.(1991)。Viewpoints: The word and the world--reconceptualizing written language development or do rainbows mean a lot to little girls?。Research in the Teaching of English,25,97-123。  new window
6.Beal, C. R.(1996)。The role of comprehension monitoring in children's revision。Educational Psychology Review,8(3),219-238。  new window
7.White, B. Y.、Frederiksen, J. R.(1998)。Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students。Cognition and Instruction,16(1),3-118。  new window
8.Flavell, John H.(1979)。Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry。American Psychologist,34(10),906-911。  new window
9.Cox, B.、Fang, Z.、Otto, B.(1995)。Preschoolers' developing ownership of the literate register。Reading Research Quarterly,32(1),34-55。  new window
10.Cox, E. B.、Fang, Z.(1998)。At-risk children's metacognitive growth during reading recovery experience: A vygotskian interpreation。Literacy Teaching and Learning,3(1),55-76。  new window
11.Dahl, K.(1993)。Children's spontaneous utterances during early reading and writing instruction in whole language classrooms。Journal of Reading Behavior,25(3),279-294。  new window
12.Fang, Z.、Cox, E. B.(1999)。Emergent metacognition: A study of preschoolers' literate behavior。Journal of Research in Childhood Education,13(2),175-186。  new window
13.Flower, L.、Hayes, J. R.(1981)。The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning。Research in the Teaching of English,15,229-244。  new window
14.Haller, E. P.、Child, D. A.、Walberg, H. J.(1988)。Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of metacognitive studies。Educational Researcher: a Publication of the American Educational Research Association,5-8。  new window
15.Manning, B.、White, C.、Daugherty, M.(1994)。Young children's private speech as a precursor to metacognitive strategy use during task engagement。Discourse Processes,17,191-211。  new window
16.Nisbett, R. E.、Wilson, Tom D.(1977)。Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes。Psychological Review,84,231-259。  new window
研究報告
1.Cox, B.、Schmitt, M.、Fang, Z.(1997)。What does reading recovery contribute to literacy development?。Indiana。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡銘津(1991)。寫作過程教學法對國小學兒童寫作成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kress, Gunther(1994)。Learning to write。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.Holdaway, D.(1979)。The foundations of literacy。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann。  new window
3.Vygotsky, Lev S.(1962)。Thought and language。Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press。  new window
4.Bronson, B. M.(2000)。Self-regulation in early childhood。Self-regulation in early childhood。New York。  new window
5.Cox, B.(1994)。Young children's regulatory talk: Evidence of emergent metacognitive control over literacy products and processes。Theoretical models and processes of reading。Newark, D.E.:International Reading Association。  new window
6.Cox, B. E.、Sulzby, E.(1982)。Evidence of planning in dialogue and monologue by five-year-old emergent readers。New inquiries in reading research and instruction。Rochester, NY。  new window
7.Flavell, J.(1985)。Cognitive Development。Cognitive Development。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
8.Garner, R.(1994)。Metacognition and executive control。Theoretical models and processes of reading。Newark, D.E.。  new window
9.Halliday, Michael A. K.、Hasan, R.(1985)。Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective。Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective。New York。  new window
10.Rowe, D.(1989)。Preschoolers' use of metacognitive knowledge and strategies in self-selected literacy events。Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction。Chicago。  new window
11.Wood, D.(1988)。How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development。How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development。Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kristeva, Julia(1980)。The Bounded Text。Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Wertsch, J. V.、Stone, C. A.(1985)。The Concept of Internalization in Vygotsky' s Account of the Genesis of Higher Mental Functions。Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Baker, L.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Metacognitive skills and reading。Handbook of Reading Research。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
4.Brown, Ann L.(1983)。Metacognitive development and reading。Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
5.Paris, S. G.、Wasik, B. A.、Westhuizen, G. V.(1988)。Meta-cognition: A review of research on metacognition and reading。Dialogues in literacy research。Newark, Delaware:International Reading Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE