:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理性或感性?Rorty人權思想與其對教育的啟示
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:洪如玉 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Ruyu
出版日期:2005
卷期:50:2
頁次:頁55-68
主題關鍵詞:人權感性教育反諷自由主義實用主義Human rightsIronic liberalismPragmatismSentimental education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
本文宗旨在探討Richard Rorty 的人權思想及其相關的教育主張。本文首先說明 Rorty 哲學的基本觀點,第二節與第三節分別說明他對西方傳統哲學的批判及其政治哲學論點,第四節說明Rorty 的人權主張,第五節為相關論辯,分析相關學者對Rorty 的批判與Rorty 的回應,第六節總結並析理Rorty 人權思想及其感性教育的主張。
This paper aims at clarifying Rorty’s conception of human rights and education. To do this it examines Rorty’s critique of traditional philosophy, his political thought and the related dispute about human rights. The paper will make clear the power of Rorty’s insights on education, especially his substitution of the “sentimental” approach for the traditional “rational” one. From Rorty’s view, the goal for education to build a human rights culture is not via more reasoning or knowing, but via sympathy and compassion for more people who could have been taken as “others” or “aliens” or “strangers.” In other words, the more people we care, the more people’s human rights are highlighted and thus respected and promoted. That is the reason why the Rortian educators need to put more stress on the cultivation of pupil’s sentimentality than rationality although the latter has been seen as the center of the conventional education.
期刊論文
1.Rorty, Richard(1996)。What's Wrong with "Rights"。Harper's Magazine,292(1753),15-19。  new window
2.Rorty, Richard(1996)。The Inspirational Value of Great Works of Literature。Raritan,16(1),8-17。  new window
3.Rorty, Richard(2000)。Response to Randall Peerenboom。Philosophy East and West,50(1),90-91。  new window
4.Rieff, David(1992)。Letter from Bosnia: Original Virtue, Original Sin。The New Yorker,82-95。  new window
5.Rorty, Richard、Rorty, R(1992)。A Pragmatist View of Rationality and Cultural Difference。Philosophy East & West,42(4),581-586。  new window
6.Peerenboom, Randall(2000)。Beyond Apologia: Respecting Legitimate Differences of Opinion While not Toadying to Dictators - A Reply to Richard Rorty。Philosophy East and West,50(1),92-96。  new window
7.Peerenboom, Randall(2000)。The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge。Philosophy East and West,50(1),56-89。  new window
8.Freeman, Michael(1994)。The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights。Human Rights Quarterly,16(3),491-514。  new window
圖書
1.徐文瑞、Rorty, Richard(1998)。偶然.反諷與團結:一個實用主義者的政治想像。臺北市:麥田圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Perry, M. J.(1988)。The idea of human rights: Four inquiries。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.張佛泉(1993)。自由與人權。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rorty, Richard(1979)。Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature。Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Rorty, Richard(1989)。Solidarity or Objectivity?。Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation。Notre Dame, IN。  new window
6.James, H.。Letters。Letters。Boston, MA。  new window
7.Rorty, Richard(2000)。Response to Habermas。Rorty and His Critics。Malden, MA。  new window
8.Murphy, Jeffrie G.(1988)。Afterword: Constitutionalism, Moral Skepticism, and Religious Belief。Constitutionism: The Philosophical Dimension。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Habermas, Jürgen(2000)。Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn。Rorty and His Critics。Blackwell Publishers Ltd.。  new window
2.蔡英文(2002)。人權之議題:人之主體權利、國家之政治權力與文化差異性。法治、人權與公民社會。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rorty, R.(1993)。Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality。On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE