:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討想法聯想過程中想法與設計案例之間的動態連結
書刊名:朝陽設計學報
作者:賴怡成 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, Ih-cheng
出版日期:2005
卷期:6
頁次:頁33-47
主題關鍵詞:想法聯想案例基礎推理檢索調整口語分析Idea associationCase-based reasoningRetrievalAdaptationProtocol analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
本研究主要探討設計者在參與腦力激盪的會議中,進行想法聯想的設計行為時,想法與設計案例之間的連結機制。首先,我們提出一個語言定義的連結模型,這個模型結合了想法聯想的三個原則(相似性、對比性與相鄰性),與案例基礎推理兩個主要的運算過程(檢索與調整)。根據這個連結模型,我們執行一個設計實驗,藉由口語分析(protocol analysis)的方法,予以了解設計想法與設計案例之間的動態連結關係,與它們檢索與調整的相關機制;最後,本研究企圖建立一個案例基礎推理的架構,稱之為動態想法地圖(Dynamic Idea Maps,簡稱DIM),用以輔助設計者進行想法聯想。
For exploring the mechanism of idea association during brainstorming, this paper proposes a linking model integrated three principles of idea association (similarity, contrast and contiguity) with two processes of case-based reasoning (retrieval and adaptation). Based on this linking model, an experiment and its protocol analysis are conducted to understand the linking relationships between ideas and cases, and the mechanisms for retrieving and adapting. Finally, a framework for case-based reasoning to support idea association during brainstorming called Dynamic Idea-Maps (DIM) is proposed.
期刊論文
1.van der Lugt, Remko(2000)。Developing a graphic tool for creative problem solving in design groups。Design Studies,21(5),505-522。  new window
2.Oxman, R.(1994)。Precedents in design: a computational model for the organization of precedent knowledge。Design Studies,15(2),141-157。  new window
3.Oxman, R.(2004)。Think Maps: teaching design thinking in design education。Design Studies,25,63-91。  new window
4.Tsatsoulis, C.、Williams, A. B.(2000)。Case-Based Reasoning。Knowledge-Based System,3,807-837。  new window
5.Schön, D. A.、Wiggins, G.(1992)。Kinds of seeing and their structures in designing。Design Studies,13,135-156。  new window
6.Rhodes, M.(1961)。An analysis of creativity。The Phi Delta Kappan,42(7),305-310。  new window
會議論文
1.Chiu, M. L.(2001)。When and Where id Design Situated in Case-Based Design。6th Conference on CAADRIA2001,(會議日期: 2001/04/19-04/21)。Sydney。3-13。  new window
2.Chiu, M. L.、Shih, S. G.(1997)。Analogical Reasoning and Adaptation in Architectural Design: Computer vs. Human Designers。CAAD Future '97,787-800。  new window
3.Petrovic, I. K.(1997)。Computer Design Agents in a Brainstorming Session。ECAADE' 97。Vienna。  new window
圖書
1.Kolodner, J. L.(1993)。Case-Based Reasoning。Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. Press。  new window
2.Leake, D. B.(1996)。Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions。The MIT Press。  new window
3.Maher, M. L.、Balachandran, M. B.、Zhang, D. M.(1995)。Cased-Based Reasoning in Design。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Osborn, A. F.(1963)。Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of creativity Thinking。New York:Charles Scribiner's Son Press。  new window
5.De Bono, E.(1970)。Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity。London:Penguin Books。  new window
6.Mitchell, W. J.(1990)。The Logic of Architecture。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press。  new window
7.Ericsson, K. Anders、Simon, Herbert Alexander(1993)。Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data。MIT Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dave, B.、Schmitt, G.、Faltings, B.、Smith, I.(1994)。Case Based Design in Architecture。Artificial Intelligence in Design- AID ’94。Doordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Flemming, U.(1994)。Case-Based Design in the SEED System。Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Architectural Design。Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE