資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.128.155.149)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
政黨組織變革與組織定位調整之研究--以中國國民黨為案例
書刊名:
行政暨政策學報
作者:
陳政忠
/
陳振祥
/
黃旭男
作者(外文):
Chen, Cheng-chung
/
Chen, Jen-shyang
/
Hwang, Shiuh-nan
出版日期:
2005
卷期:
41
頁次:
頁81-113
主題關鍵詞:
政黨組織
;
定位調整
;
組織變革
;
中斷均衡
;
Political party
;
Repositioning
;
Organizational change
;
Punctuated equilibrium
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:47
組織在面對內外部環境變遷時,及時透過組織變革予以因應,實為維繫組織效能之關鍵所在。然而組織變革為一複雜的管理議題,以組織變革理論探討組織定位調整,對政黨發展有其重要性。組織演化觀點的「中斷均衡」(punctuated equilibrium)論點,認為組織遭遇環境重大變遷時,組織也需要進行大幅度的組織變革活動,然後持續進行組織構成要素的演化改進,是維持組織與環境最佳匹配的做法。本研究針對中國國民黨面對政治環境的激烈變遷時,探討其對於組織定他調整與推動變革的相關議題,以訪問資料進行探索性的驗證,結果顯示國民黨之組織變革與組織定位調整符合「中斷均衡」論點。另外,組織變革之文化慣性對政黨組織之變革行為產生較大的阻礙,而需推動組織學習與採取較大幅度的組織變革的活動,較能克服文化慣性對組織變革的抗拒。本研究對政黨進行組織變革與組織定位調整,具有政策制定上的涵義,對政黨組織與變革管理之相關後續研究,有拋磚引玉之效果。
以文找文
Organization’s reason for quick responds to organizational changes while facing both changing internal and external environments is to maintain organizational effectiveness. Organizational change is a complex management issue, according to the theory of organization change; adjusting the repositioning of organization is closely related to the development of party in political point of view. According to organization evolution, the theory of Punctuated Equilibrium suggest that when facing effected by the environmental changes, a great range of progressive organizational evolution, in addition to, the innovations regarding the factors of organization evolution are best for maintaining the equilibrium among organizations and the environment. The following research is based on the extreme political environment changes faced by The National Party (Kuo-Min Tang). Adjusting the repositioning of organization and motivating the political reform are discussed. The result of collected self-administered questionnaires strongly proved the hypothesis in this research by theory of Punctuated Equilibrium. More, the stereotypical culture of organization is the obstacle for organization reform. On the other hand, motivating organizational learning and upgrading and adapting a great range of progressive organizational evolution will overcome the conflict of the stereotypical culture of organization. The following research regarding repositioning of political party, in the case of KMT, is proved with meaningful political strategies and policies.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
O'Reilly, Charles A. III(1989)。Corporations, Culture, and Commitment: Motivation and Social Control in Organizations。California Management Review,31(4),9-25。
2.
Miller, D.、Friesen, P. H.(1982)。Structural Change and Performance: Quantum Versus Piecemeal-Incremental Approaches。Academy of Management Journal,25,867-892。
3.
Barnett, William P.、Carroll, Glenn R.(1995)。Modeling Internal Organizational Change。Annual Review of Sociology,21(1),217-236。
4.
Amburgey, Terry L.、Kelly, Dawn、Barnett, William P.(1993)。Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure。Administrative Science Quarterly,38(1),51-73。
5.
Mintzberg, H.(1984)。Power and Organizational Life Cycles。The Academy of Management Review,9(2),207-224。
6.
Burgelman, R. A.(1991)。Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research。Organization Science,2(2),239-262。
7.
Kotter, John P.(1995)。Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail。Harvard Business Review,73(2),59-67。
8.
Tushman, Michael L.、O'Reilly, Charles A. III(1996)。Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change。California Management Review,38(4),8-29。
9.
Dutton, Jane E.、Ashford, Susan J.、O'Neill, Regina M.、Hayes, Erika、Wierba, Elizabeth E.(1997)。Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers。Strategic Management Journal,18(5),407-425。
10.
Hannan, Michael T.、Freeman, John H.(1977)。The Population Ecology of Organizations。American Journal of Sociology,82(5),929-964。
11.
Porter, Michael E.(1996)。What is strategy?。Harvard Business Review,74(6),61-80。
12.
Greiner, Larry E.(1972)。Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow。Harvard Business Review,50(4),37-46。
13.
Tushman, Michael L.、Anderson, Philip(1986)。Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments。Administrative Science Quarterly,31(3),439-465。
14.
Gersick, Connie J. G.(1991)。Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Qquilibrium Paradigm。The Academy of Management Review,16(1),10-36。
15.
Tushman, Michael L.、Romanelli, Elaine(1994)。Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test。The Academy of Management Journal,37(5),1141-1166。
16.
Levinthal, Daniel A.(1991)。Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change。Organization Science,2,140-145。
17.
Lawson, Robert B.、Ventriss, Curtus L.(1992)。Organizational Change: The Role of Organizational Culture and Organizational Learning。Psychological Record,42(2),205-239。
18.
Bickhard, Mark H.、Campbell, Donald T.(2003)。Variations in Variation and Selection: Variation-and-Selection-Retention Ratchet in Emergent Organizational Complexity, Part II: Quantum Field Theory。Foundations of Science,8,215-282。
19.
Siggelkow, Nicolaj(2001)。Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne。Academy of Management Journal,44(4),838-857。
20.
McGuinness, Tony、Strong, Carolyn A.、Morgan, Robert E.(2003)。Product-market Positioning and Prospector Strategy。European Journal of Marketing,37(10),1409-1439。
21.
Dutton, Jane E.、Ashford, Susan J.、O'Neill, Regina M.、Lawrence, Katherine A.(2001)。Moves that Matter: Issue Selling and Organizational Change。Academy of Management Journal,44(4),716-736。
22.
Pentland, Brian T.、Rueter, Henry H.(1994)。Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action。Administrative Science Quarterly,39(3),484-510。
23.
Burgelman, Robert A.、Barnett, William P.(1996)。Evolutionary Perspectives on Strategy。Strategic Management Journal,17(2),5-19。
24.
Peters, Katherine M.(2001)。The War at Home。Government Executive,33(14),27-31。
25.
Siggelkow, Nicolaj(2002)。Evolution toward Fit。Administrative Science Quarterly,47,125-159。
26.
Wetlaufer, Suzy、Brabeck, Peter(2001)。The Business Case against Revolution: An Interview with Nestlè's Peter Brabeck。Harvard Business Review,79(2),113-119。
學位論文
1.
葉淑媚(2000)。我國憲政體制之選擇:一九九0到二000(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Jones, Gareth R.(1995)。Organizational Theory: Text and Cases。New Jersey:Prentice Hall。
2.
Nadler, D. A.、Tushman, M. L.(1997)。Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture。New York:Oxford University Press。
3.
Hammer, Michael、Champy, James(1993)。Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution。London:Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited。
4.
Mintzberg, H.(1993)。Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
5.
Tushman, Michael L.、O'Reilly, C. A.(1997)。Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press。
6.
Davenport, T. H.(1993)。Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology。Harvard Business School Press。
7.
Miles, Raymond E.、Snow, Charles C.(1978)。Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process。McGraw-Hill。
8.
Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。
9.
Eldredge, N.、Gould, S.(1972)。Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism。Models in Paleobiology。San Francisco, CA。
圖書論文
1.
Nadler, David A.、Tushman, Michael L.(1992)。Designing Organizations that Have Good Fit。Organizational Architecture: Designs For Chan^Inp Organizations。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
1.
論我國軍人的「政治中立」:政黨輪替之檢驗(2000~2008年)
1.
論我國軍人的「政治中立」:政黨輪替之檢驗(2000~2008年)
2.
論我國軍人的「政治中立」:政黨輪替之檢驗(2000~2008年)
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code