:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Emergence of the Neo-Extended Family in Contemporary Taiwan
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:董安琪 引用關係陳肇男劉克智
作者(外文):Tung, An-chiChen, Chao-nanLiu, Paul Ke-chih
出版日期:2006
卷期:32
頁次:頁123-152
主題關鍵詞:Extended familyInformal social supportFamily change擴大家庭非正式社會支持家庭變遷
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:66
本文依受訪者與不同住親屬之互動關係提出一個新的家庭分類法,不但可與傳統分類法互補,而且可以用來檢視親人間的互動是否可以跨越同住的限制。文中以互動頻率與居住距離兩個面向來界定互動關係,兩個面向各再分兩類,共計四種類型,即新式擴大家庭、散居家庭、疏離家庭,與孤立家庭。我們利用台灣社會變遷第四期第二次調查資料進行實證分析,發現新式擴大家庭在四種類型中所佔比例最高,此類家庭的主要決定因素包括教育、工資、宗教、住屋所有權、子女奉養,與是否分產等。其中,後兩點顯示傳統價值與財產的積聚或分享乃是臺灣家庭型式變化相對較少的主因。而新式擴大家庭對社會支持的交換較他類家庭比例為高,說明互動頻繁與居住鄰近是家庭維繫的主因。
In response to industrialization and urbanization, changes in the form and function of family seem inevitable. In the study of family decline, a new typology of family is advanced that is based on kin relationships beyond co-residence boundaries. Four subtypes of family are distinguished according to contact frequency and spatial proximity, namely, the neo-extended, dispersed, alienated, and detached sub-types of family. Analyzing data collected from the fourth round of Taiwan Social Change Survey, we have identified the main determinants in the formation of a neoextended family, which include respondents’ socioeconomic status (education, wages, homeownership, religiousness), degree of adherence to traditional value, and whether or not family property has been divided. Moreover, we have found that most respondents belong to the neo-extended family, and exchanges between the respondents and their close relatives are relatively high. These findings point out that family function has been maintained despite of the progress of the nuclearization, due mainly to frequent contact and residential proximity between non-coresiding families.
期刊論文
1.Bengtson, V. L.(2001)。Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds。Journal of Marriage and the Family,63,1-16。  new window
2.Litwak, Eugene(1960)。Geographic Mobility and Extended Family Cohesion。American Sociological Review,25(3),385-394。  new window
3.Popenoe, D.(1993)。American Family Decline, 1960-1990: A Review and Appraisal。Journal of Marriage and Family,55(3),527-555。  new window
4.Ellison, C. G.、George, L. K.(1994)。Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,33(1),46-61。  new window
5.Hoyert, D. L.(1991)。Financial and Household Exchanges Between Generations。Research on Aging,13(2),205-225。  new window
6.Bonvalet, C.(2003)。The Neo-Extended Family Circle。Population - An English Selection,58(1),9-41。  new window
7.Bumpass, Larry L.(1990)。What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change。Demography,27(4),483-498。  new window
8.楊靜利、陳寬政(20021200)。臺灣地區子女離家的原因與步調。人口學刊,25,120-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.莊英章(19720900)。臺灣農村家族對現代化的適應:一個田野調查實例的分析。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,34,85-98。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉克智、董安琪(20030600)。臺灣都市發展的演進--歷史的回顧與展望。人口學刊,26,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Bernheim, B. Douglas、Shleifer, Andrei、Summers, Lawrence H.(1985)。The Strategic Bequest Motive。Journal of Political Economy,93(6),1045-1076。  new window
12.Lee, Yean-Ju、Parish, William L.、Willis, Robert J.(1994)。Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan。American Journal of Sociology,99(4),1010-1041。  new window
13.Coombs, L. C.、Sun, T. H.(1981)。Family Values in A Developing Society: A Decade of Change in Taiwan。Social Forces,59,1229-1255。  new window
14.Couch, K. A.、Mary, C. D.、Wolf, D. A.(1999)。Time? Money? Both? The Allocation of Resources to Older Parents。Demography,36(2),219-232。  new window
15.劉克智(1979)。Economic Aspects of Rapid Urbanization in Taipei。經濟論文,7(1),151-187。  new window
16.施樂苑(1993)。Family Financial and Household Support Exchange between Generations: A Survey of Chinese Rural Elderly。The Gerontologist,33(4),468-480。  new window
17.Thornton, A.、Thomas, E. F.(1987)。Social Change and the Family: Comparative Perspective From the West, China, and South Asia。Sociological Forum,2(4),746-779。  new window
會議論文
1.Chang, M. C.(1988)。Changing Family Network and Social Welfare in Taiwan。Taipei。  new window
2.Silverstein, M.、Li, S.、Zhang, W.(2002)。Intergenerational Exchange in Rural Chinese Families。0。  new window
研究報告
1.章英華、傅仰止(2002)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃:第四期第二次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC90-2420-H-001-004-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pannell, C. W.(1973)。Tai’Chung, T’aiWan: Structure and Function。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Department of Geography。  new window
2.Balchin, P. N.、Isaac, D.、Chen, J.(2000)。Urban Economics: A Global Perspective。Urban Economics: A Global Perspective。New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Chu, C. Y. Cyrus、Yu, R. R.、Tsay, R.(2005)。Bequeathable Assets, Kinship Pressure and Visits by Adult Children。Bequeathable Assets, Kinship Pressure and Visits by Adult Children。0。  new window
4.Hutter, M.(1998)。The Changing Family。The Changing Family。Boston, MA。  new window
5.劉克智(1992)。Science, Technology and Human Capital Formation。Taiwan from Developing to Mature Economy。Boulder。  new window
6.Alden, Speare, Jr.、Liu, K. C.、Tsay, C. L.(1980)。Urbanization and Development: The Rural-urban Transition in Taiwan。Urbanization and Development: The Rural-urban Transition in Taiwan。Boulder。  new window
7.Weinstein, M.、Sun, T. H.、Chang, M. C.、Freedman, R.(1994)。Co-residence and Other Ties Linking Couples and Their Parents。Social Change and the Family in Taiwan。Chicago, IL。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE