:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Interpretations on 228: The 28[90bb] February 1947 Incident on Taiwan and the Taiwan Independence Movement
書刊名:輔仁歷史學報
作者:Fleischauer, Stefan
出版日期:2006
卷期:17
頁次:頁517-552
主題關鍵詞:二二八事件臺灣獨立運動臺灣民族主義臺灣外省人二二八詮釋228-incidentTaiwan independence movementTaiwan nationalismMainlanders228-interpretations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
隨著一九四七年三月的軍事鎮壓,二二八事件被國民黨迅速掩蓋起來,一九五○年國民黨盡全力讓二二八事件在臺灣社會與媒體報導中消失;然而紮根於日本的海外臺灣獨立運動又重新喚起對此事件的注意,對臺灣獨立運動者而言,二二八是有利於臺灣獨立的重要政治因素,它是用來對抗來自大陸的國民黨政權。在臺灣民主化後,雖然臺灣獨立的請求與對二二八的討論已公開,但二二八仍在獨立運動中扮演重要角色。本文希望能展現臺灣獨立運動者如何為維持其在運動中的合理性,而對二二八作出不同的詮釋,藉以觀察二○○四年以來台灣政治的發展。
Following the brutal suppression of the 228-Incident in March 1947, the incident was swiftly covered up by the KMT-regime. In 1950, the 228-incident vanished from the Taiwanese media altogether, and the regime made every effort to erase the memory of 228 from Taiwanese society. However, the Taiwan Independence Movement (TIM) overseas, which first took root in Japan in the l950s, kept the memory of the incident alive. From the perspective of the TIM, 228 was an important political asset m their struggle for Taiwan Independence, since it could be utilized to rally support against the mainlander-dominated regime of the KMT. Even during and after the process of democratization in Taiwan, when both the call for Taiwan Independence as well as an open debate on the 228-incident were made possible, 228 continued to play an important role for the TIM. This article wishes to show how the TIM utilized the memory of 228 in their struggle for national independence, and how different interpretations of the incident had to be developed in order to preserve its legitimating power for the movement. As could be observed in 2004, these developments are still continuing today.
期刊論文
1.廖文毅(19451000)。發刊辭--告我臺灣同胞。前鋒,1,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
2.弔祭因二二八革命而成仁的英靈。臺灣青年,99,1。  延伸查詢new window
3.時事對話(4):臺灣獨立運動的背景及其本質。臺灣青年,97,4。  延伸查詢new window
4.天地人。臺灣獨立革命必定成功。臺灣青年,98,7。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1997)。FAPA為臺灣人作了什麼?。民主時代,5,58-61。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1984)。二二八的意義。Taidu Yuekan,12,2。  延伸查詢new window
7.偶陰(1983)。臺灣何處去?。Taidu Yuekan,4,10。  延伸查詢new window
8.先知(1961)。清算陳義,欽佩湯恩伯。Zili Wanbao,1。  延伸查詢new window
9.杜政隆(1996)。李登輝是受害人?林義雄率員抗議,要求說明。臺灣時報。  延伸查詢new window
10.(2004)。唐詩:〞天意?贏0.228%扁呂驚險連任〞。臺灣時報,1。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1992)。論民族主義及反帝。Taidu Yuekan,111,3。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.施正鋒、陳銘城(2000)。臺灣獨立建國聯盟的故事。前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王育德(2000)。臺灣─苦悶的歷史。臺灣─苦悶的歷史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.史明(1998)。臺灣人四百年史。草根文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.張炎憲(2006)。二二八事件責任歸屬研究報告。台北:財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會。  延伸查詢new window
5.張炎憲、胡慧玲、曾秋美(2000)。臺灣獨立運動的先聲:臺灣共和國。臺北:吳三連臺灣史料基金會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Chen, Yong-Xin(1988)。公佈真相,平反冤屈─二二八和平日宣言。走出二二八的陰影.二二八事件四十週年紀念專輯。Tokio。  延伸查詢new window
7.李筱峰(1999)。臺灣史100件大事(2)。臺灣史100件大事(2)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.劉峰松。一千八百萬人的臺灣史。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2003)。逾六成國人不了解二二八事件始末,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁束華(2002)。二二八,最成功的反對運動,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1999)。二十三位民進黨立委提出聯合質詢,要求公佈228真相,公開道歉。  延伸查詢new window
5.林正義(1999)。贊成〞臺獨〞列入黨綱,一萬比零也沒有用?,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(2004)。彭孟緝拒絕公開道歉,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1999)。李總統責無旁貸,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.林獻堂(1995)。新公園,臺上臺下兩樣情。  延伸查詢new window
9.李欣芳(2004)。手護臺灣圓滿,扁支持度上升,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.尹章義(2002)。以二二八事件作為鬥爭工具的時代已過去,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃文雄(2003)。四二四刺蔣事件的回顧與反思。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE