:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:An Inquiry into the Cultus of Living and Dying of Chinese People
書刊名:慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊
作者:余德慧李維倫李雪菱 引用關係彭榮邦石世明
作者(外文):Yee, Der-HeuyLee, Wei-LunLee, Shiue-LingPeng, Rong-BangShih, Shih-Ming
出版日期:2007
卷期:6
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:涵育文化生與死二律背反造作意識啟明意識CultusCultureLiving and dyingParadoxical tensionMaking consciousnessRevealing consciousness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
本研究旨在探討文化的的對立面向--「涵育」(Cultus)的性質。我們假設文化是一個明顯的意義對世界顯化的系統,通常透過公開的符意的連結,使得文化意義得以自外於個體而獲得保存,但是對文化心理學研究言之,最重要的問題則在於個體如何參與文化,但是個體的具現經驗並不反映文化也不在於文化符碼的內化,而是在於個體與文化之間的介面,在這介面裡,個體生產著隨個體處境變化的涵育而非系統性的文化。 為了探討這個假設,本研究將處於面對生死處境的癌症病人與其照顧者所遭遇的情況當作具體狀況,透過他們對面臨死亡處境的不同狀況:(1)瞬間感受到死亡的之切近性(以CS護士的經驗為例);(2)走到癌症的邊緣又走回來(以KA為例)、以及(3)接近死亡的終點,又活過來(以MG師姐為例),說明他們在這些「墜落」經驗裡所感受的經驗性質,以四種面向來說明涵育與文化的分野:(一)二律背反的緊張(paradoxical tension);(二)顯義的過程(signifying process);(三)他人與自我的臨現(presence of self and other);(四)主要的存在模式(primary mode of being)。經分析發現:具有涵育性質的墜落經驗,其與文化價值的二律背反緊張度愈高,其顯義過程愈見隱晦,主要的存在模式保持在知覺而非識覺層面,臨現感也愈為真摯。 這個結果我們以為涵育與文化的分殊在於意識狀態的差異,文化由人類的「造作意識」(making consciousness)所生產,而涵育則由「啟明意識」(revealing consciousness)所啟動,兩者的差異主要有個共同基底來操作,兩者的背反乃在於存在方式的運動方向,涵育朝內運動,主要在圓滿個體的存育,文化是朝外的運動,主要在於造就世界。
Dying in Chinese culture is a process of Cultus, that is, individuals who participate in the process of dying, whether he is the person who is dying or the person who is the carer, co-construct an embodied phenomenon within the cultural system, by which individuals first enact a discursive plot to make the meaning of the dying process well formed, and then manifest the temporally meaningful insights. But Nevertheless, this manifestation can'not be organized in text form to beas a manufactured as a and well well-defined 'culture form', rather it only embodies the situatedness of dying in the Chinese mind. In this study, staff and terminally ill patients and the staffs in a palliative ward and cancer patients in a Buddhist temple were interviewed,, and their narrative data were reframed by phenomenological reduction, and inquiry into the grounds of their speaking. The authors set up 4 four sub-processes to explore the meaning of cultus in contrast to culture: signifying process, paradoxical tension, primary mode of being and presence of self and others. The major findings are (1) By power searching of their falling experiences, there are some revealing moments make them get into a situatedness of unconcealment, we are able to specify the grounds that support such revealing moments become possible; (2) There are paradoxical tensions between the unconcealed cultus and cultural values in general. The ground for the tensions is supposed to be the antinomy of two modes of consciousness, one of which is the 'making' consciousness, that is the mind of 'production' and 'reproduction', which tends to make things happen in such ways that would help the dying person returning to Home in the Heaven or Home. While this making consciousness empties the substantial sense of a visible Tao (whether it is liberation or salvation), the revealing consciousness, the another mode of consciousness, leads to an existential re-grounding by falling into the abyss (knowing death first then to live), and by livinge on inner temporality. (3) The cultus of living andad dying shows the continuous interaction between visible cultural forms and the invisible embodied experiences.
期刊論文
1.Yee, D. H.(2000)。The unfolding of dying process。Taiwan Journal of Hospice Palliative Care,5(2),29-32。  new window
2.Shieh, S. M.、Yee, D. H.(2001)。A research into spiritual issues in terminal care。Formosa Journal of Mental Health,14(1),1-36。  new window
3.Hines, D. R.(1992)。Presence。Journal of Holistic Nursing,10(4),294-306。  new window
4.Parse, R. R.(1992)。Human becoming。Nursing Science Quarterly,5(1),35-42。  new window
5.McKivergin, M. J.、Daubenmire, M. J.(1994)。The healing process of presence。Journal of Holistic Nursing,12(1),65-82。  new window
6.Little, M.、Jordens, C. F. C.、Paul, K.、Montgomery, K.、Philipson, B.(1998)。Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness。Social Sciences and Medicine,47(10),1485-1494。  new window
7.Scheper-Hughes, Nancy、Lock, Margaret M.(198703)。The Mindful Body:A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology。Medical Anthropology Quarterly,1(1),6-41。  new window
圖書
1.Paterson, J. G.、Zderad, L. T.(1976)。Humanistic nursing。Humanistic nursing。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
2.Strathern, Andrew J.(1996)。Body Thoughts。Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan Press。  new window
3.Watts, Alan(1975)。Tao, The Watercourse Way。Penguin。  new window
4.Waley, A.(1968)。The Way and the Power。London:Allen & Unwin。  new window
5.Steere, D.(1967)。On being present where you are。Lebanon, PA:Sowers Printing。  new window
6.Jaspers K.、Manheim, R.(1951)。The Way to Wisdom。New Haven CT:London:Yale University Press。  new window
7.Charmaz, K.(1997)。Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press。  new window
8.Zaner, Richard M.(1981)。The Context of Self: A Phenomenological Inquiry Using Medicine as a Clue。Athens, OH:Ohio University Press。  new window
9.Merleau-Ponty, M.、McCleary, R. C.(1964)。Signs。Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press。  new window
10.Washburn, M.(1995)。The ego and the dynamic ground: Transpersonal theory of human development。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
11.Eliade, M.、Sheed, R.(1958)。Patterns in comparative religion。New York:Sheed & Ward。  new window
12.Lévinas, Emmanuel、Lingis, Alphonso(1969)。Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority。Duquesne University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Halton, E.(1992)。The cultic roots of culture。Theory of Culture。Berkeley, Ca.:University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE