紙筆與電腦工具對設計專家與設計生手草圖行為的評估與分析_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	紙筆與電腦工具對設計專家與設計生手草圖行為的評估與分析
書刊名：	藝術教育研究
作者：	陳慧霞／游萬來
作者(外文)：	Chen, Hui-hsia／You, Manlai
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	14
頁次：	頁61-95+97-99
主題關鍵詞：	草圖行為；紙筆工具；設計生手；設計專家；電腦工具；設計教育；Digital tool；Computer；Expert designer；Novice designer；Sketching；Traditional tool；Paper & pencil；Design education
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:17

電腦工具改變了設計行為，開啟電腦輔助概念設計議題的探討，不同經驗的設計專家與生手，因不同工具的使用造成草圖行為的差異。基於兩大議題的整合性，本研究目標：比較設計專家與生手在概念設計階段使用電腦與紙筆工具，第一，草圖行為的差異？不同特徵的草圖行為表現？第二，設計者與草圖進行溝通互動的過程（「看」與「動」的行為）分析？第三，構想過程與構想成果的異同？第四，提出兼具量化與質性的評估工具（2 構面與6 大指標）分析方法來紀錄與解構草圖行為。結果發現使用紙筆工具的設計專家與生手有別於使用電腦工具的草圖行為，包含草圖數量多、獨特性高、思考流暢度佳、較佳的構想搜尋模式等；專家的概念構想模式，可作為生手提升為專家的學習目標；專家與生手皆指出電腦工具的視覺化特性不會明顯影響進行設計問題的評估，但使用紙筆工具，卻可以快速表達構想、易於觀察圖像造形與執行「判斷的看」動作，同時所產生的觸覺心理因素，是電腦工具無法取代的。

以文找文

Computer tool has changed the behavior of design, and explore the issues of computer aided conceptual design. Designers’ sketching and thinking have been changed in accordance with different design tools in the conceptual stage. This study explores and analyzes the comparison between designers’ sketching in traditional and digital tools. The aims are: 1.Comparing the differences of novice and expert designers’ sketching with traditional and digital tools and finding some characteristics to decompose sketching; 2.Proposing a method on analyzing the interactive communication process (seeing-moving-seeing); 3.Detecting the similarities as well as differences on conceptual process and its outcomes; 4.Proposing a technique that consists of qualitative and quantitative analysis to record designers’ sketching and identify 2 dimensions and 6 characteristics. Results show that traditional tool has advantages over the digital tool, such as more number of sketches generated, higher originality of sketches, excellent fluency of design thinking, an ideal approach for concept generation adapted, etc. This study provides an expert’s approach for concept generation in order to make it a learning motivation for novices to upgrade to expert designers and a reference for design education. Both experts and novices have stated that visualization of computer tools would not exert an apparent compact on design evaluation and application. With traditional tool, however, it would be easier for them not only to express their ideation, but also to observe the sketches with judgment. Finally, computer tools can never replace traditional tool in the way that the latter can influence people physiologically through their tactility.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Elsas, P. A.、Vergeest, J. S. M.(1998)。New Functionality for Computer Aided Conceptual Design: The Displacement Feature。Design Studies，19(1)，81-102。
2.	Hanna, R.、Barber, T.(2001)。An Inquiry into Computers in Design: Attitude Before-attitudes After。Design Studies，22(3)，255-281。
3.	Marx, J.(2000)。A proposal for alternative methods for teaching digital design。Automation in Construction，9，19-35。
4.	Liu, Y. C.、Bligh, T.(2003)。Towards an "Ideal" approach for Concept Generation。Design Studies，24(4)，341-355。
5.	Lloyd, P.、Scott, P.(1995)。Difference in Similarity: Interpreting the Architectural Design Process。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design，22，383-406。
6.	Tasli, S.、Erkip, F.(2006)。Attitudes of Design Students towards Computer Usage in Design。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，16，79-95。
7.	Madrazo, L.(1999)。Types and Instances: A Paradigm for Teaching Design with Computers。Design Studies，20，177-193。
8.	Van Dijk, C. G. C.(1995)。New insights in computer-aided design。Design Studies，16(1)，62-80。
9.	Akin, Ö(1990)。Necessary Condition for Expertise and Creativity。Design Studies，11(2)，107-113。
10.	Jindo, Tomio、Hirasago, Kiyomi、Nagamachi, Mitsuo(1995)。Development of a design support system for office chairs using 3-D graphics。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，15(1)，49-62。
11.	Gamer, S.(2001)。Comparing graphic actions between remote and proximal design teams。Design Studies，22(4)，365-376。
12.	Won, P.-H(2001)。The Comparison between Visual Thinking Using Computer and Conventional Media in the Concept Generation Stages of Design。Automation in Construction，10，319-325。
13.	Verstijnen, I. M.、Leeumen, C.、Goldschmidt, G.、Hamel, R.、Hennessey, J. M.(1998)。Sketching and creative discovery。Design Studies，19(4)，519-546。
14.	Suwa, M.、Purcell, T.、Gero, J. S.(1998)。Macroscopic Analysis of Design Processes Based on a Scheme for Coding Designers' Cognitive Actions。Design Studies，19(4)，455-483。
15.	Stiny, George(1980)。Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design，B7，343-351。
16.	Stiny, G.、Mitchell, W. J.(1978)。The Palladian grammar。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design，5(1)，5-18。
17.	Scrivener, S. A. R.(1993)。Designing at a distance via real-time designer-to-designer interaction。Design Studies，14(3)，261-282。
18.	Schön, D. A.、Wiggins, G.(1992)。Kinds of seeing and their structures in designing。Design Studies，13，135-156。
19.	Purcell, A. T.、Gero, J. S.(1998)。Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology。Design Studies，19(4)，389-430。
20.	McGown, A.、Green, G.、Rodgers, P.(1998)。Visible ideas: information patterns of conceptual sketch activity。Design Studies，19(4)，431-453。
21.	Liu, Y. T.(1991)。Schematic-designer: a knowledge-based CAD system for schematic design in architecture。Design Studies，12(3)，151-167。
22.	Jenkins, D. L.、Martin, R. R.(1993)。The importance of free-hand sketching in conceptual design: automatic sketch input。American Society of Mechanical Division，53，115-128。
23.	Goldschmidt, Gabriela(1991)。The dialectics of sketching。Creativity Research Journal，4(2)，123-143。
24.	Gero, J. S.、Tang, H. H.(2001)。Differences between Retrospective and Concurrent Protocols in Revealing the Process-oriented Aspects of the Design Process。Design Studies，21(3)，283-295。
25.	Flemming, U.(1987)。More than the sum of parts: the grammar of Queen Anne Houses。Environ. Planning B，4，323-350。
26.	Cross, Nigel(1999)。Natural Intelligence in Design。Design Studies，20(1)，25-39。
27.	Suwa, Masaki、Tversky, Barbara(1997)。What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis。Design Studies，18(4)，385-403。
28.	Liu, Y. T.(1996)。Is Designing One Search or Two? A mModel of Deign Thinking Involving Symbolism and Connectionism。Design Studies，17(4)，435-449。
29.	Liu, Yu-Tung、Architecture Group(1996)。Is designing one search or two? A model of design thinking involving symbolism and connectionism。Design Studies，17(4)，435-449。
30.	Flemming, U.(1987)。More than the sum of part: the grammar of Queen Anne Houses。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design，14，323-350。
31.	Suwa, Masaki、Tversky, Barbara(1997)。What do architects and student perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis。Design Studies，18(4)，340-385。
32.	Liu, Y. T.(1996)。Is designing one search or two? A model of deign thinking involving symbolism and connectionism。Design Studies，17(4)，435-449。

會議論文
1.	Chen, S. C.(2001)。Analysis of the Use of Computer Media by Expert and Novice Designers。Computer Aided Architectural Design and Research in Asia Conference。Sydney, Australia：University of Sydney。71-80。
2.	Wong, C. H.(2000)。Some phenomena of design thinking in the concept generation stage using computer media。The Fifth Conference on Computer- Aided Architectural Design Research in Conference。Singapore：Nation University of Singapore。255-264。
3.	Chen, H. H.、You, M.(2004)。The Comparison between Novice and Expert Designers' Sketching in Conceptual Design。Melbourne, Australia。
4.	Suwa, M.、Purcell, T.、Gero, J.(2001)。Constructive Perception in Design。0。227-239。
5.	Chen, H. H.、You, M.、Lee, C. F.(2003)。The Sketch in Industrial Design Process。Japan。7-7。
6.	Chen, S. C.(2001)。Analysis of the use of computer media by expert and novice designers。Sydney。71-80。
7.	Suwa, Masaki、Purcell, T.、Gero, J.(2001)。Constructive perception in design227-239。
8.	Wong, C. H.(2000)。Some phenomena of design thinking in the concept generation stage using computer media。Singapore。255-264。
9.	Chen, H. H.、You, M.、Lee, C. F.(2003)。The sketch in industrial design process。Japan。7。
10.	Chen, H. H.、You, M.(2004)。The comparison between novice and expert designers' sketching in conceptual design。Australia。
11.	Suwa, M.、Purcell, T.、Gero, J.(2001)。Constructive perception in design227-239。

學位論文
1.	池蓉姬(2003)。不同文化對標誌符號的辨識與偏好影響研究--以台灣（華語系）與阿根廷（西班牙語系）為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學，新竹。延伸查詢
2.	池蓉姬(2003)。不同文化對標誌符號的辨識與偏好影響研究：以臺灣（華語系）與阿根廷（西班牙語系）為例，0。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Cross, N.(1994)。Engineering design methods, strategy or product design。John Wiley & Sons。
2.	Goel, Vinod(1995)。Sketches of Thought。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。
3.	Pugh, S.(1991)。Total Design, Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering。Addison-Wesley。
4.	Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者：專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北：遠流。延伸查詢
5.	Anderson, John R.(1983)。The Architecture of Cognition。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
6.	Simon, H. A.(1992)。The Science of the Artificial。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。
7.	Roozenburg, N. F. M.、Eekels, J.(1995)。Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods。John Wiley & Sons Ltd.。
8.	Pugh, S.(1991)。Total Design。Reading, Massachusetts。
9.	Pipes, A.(1990)。Drawing for 3-dimensional Design: Concepts, Illustration, and Presentation。London, UK：Thames and Hudson。
10.	Lawson, B.(1994)。Design in mind。Oxford：Butterworth Architecture。
11.	Herbert, D. M.(1993)。Architectural Study Drawings。New York, NY：Van Nostrand Reinhold。
12.	習嘉(1992)。商標設計1000。臺北：臺灣珠海。延伸查詢
13.	Torrance, E. P.(1965)。Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
14.	Simon, H. A.(1999)。The Science of the Artificial。The Science of the Artificial。Cambridge, MA。
15.	Larkin, J.(1981)。Enriching Formal Knowledge: A Model for Learning to Solve Textbook Physics Problems。Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition。Hillsdale, NJ。
16.	Scrivener, S. A. R.、Clark., S. M.(1994)。Sketching in Collaboration Design。Interacting Virtual Environment。Chichester, UK。
17.	Bonnardel, N.、Marmèche, E.(2001)。Creative Design Activities: The Evocation Process and Its Evolution with Regard to Expertise。Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design, V。Sydney, Australia。
18.	Goel, Vinod(1994)。Sketches of Thought。Sketches of Thought。Cambridge, MA。
19.	Bonnardel, N.、Marmèche, E.(2001)。Creative design activities: The evocation process and its evolution with regard to expertise。Computational and cognitive models of creative design V。Sydney。
20.	Dorst, D.、Dijkhuis, J.(1996)。Comparing paradigms for describing design activity。Analyzing design activity。UK。
21.	Guilford, Joy Paul(1970)。Traits of Creativity。Creativity and its cultivation。Harmondsworth。
22.	Larkin, J.(1981)。Enriching formal knowledge: A model for learning to solve textbook physics problems。Cognitive skills and their acquisition。Hillsdale, New Jersey。
23.	Lawson, Bryan(1994)。Design in mind。Design in mind。Oxford。
24.	Scrivener, Stephen A. R.、Clark, S. M.(1994)。Sketching in collaboration design。Interacting virtual environment。Chichester。
25.	Simon, H. A.(1999)。The science of the artificial (3rd Ed.)。Cambridge, MA。
26.	Bonnardel, N.、Marmèche, E.(2001)。Creative design activities: The evocation process and its evolution with regard to expertise。Computational and cognitive models of creative design V。Sydney。
27.	Scrivener, S. A. R.、Clark, S. M.(1994)。Sketching in collaboration design。Interacting virtual environment。Chichester。
28.	Larkin, J.(1981)。Enriching formal knowledge: A model for learning to solve textbook physics problems。Cognitive skills and their acquisition。Hillsdale, NJ。

其他
1.	Bilda, Z.，Demirkan, H.，Erkip, F.(2000)。Traditional versus Digital Design Medium: A Case Study in the Interior Design Studio，http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~zafer/exp.htm。
2.	Bilda, Z.，Demirkan, H.，Erkip, F.(2000)。Traditional versus digital design medium: A case study in the interior design studio，Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey。
3.	Chen, Hsiu-Han，You, M.，Lee, C. F.(2003)。The sketch in industrial design process，Japan。
4.	Chen, Hsiu-Han，You, M.(2004)。The Comparison between novice and expert designers' sketching in conceptual design，Australia。
5.	Bilda, Z.，Demirkan, H.，Erkip, F.(2000)。Traditional versus digital design medium: A case study in the interior design studio，Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey。，www.bilkent.edu.tr/-zafer。

圖書論文
1.	Guilford, J. P.(1970)。Traits of Creativity。Creativity and Its Cultivation。Harmondsworth：Creativity Penguin。
2.	Dorst, D.、Dijkhuis, J.(1996)。Comparing paradigms for describing design activity。Analyzing design activity。Chichester：John Wiley & Sons。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	不同認知型態對詞圖構思與分鏡腳本表現之影響
2.	平面設計過程中使用傳統工具與電腦工具的草圖行為研究

1.	認知型態於數位學習系統之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫