:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:營業秘密在智慧財產權訴訟之開示與保護--以秘密保持命令之比較法考察為中心
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:黃國昌 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Kuo-chang
出版日期:2008
卷期:68
頁次:頁151-206
主題關鍵詞:營業秘密智慧財產權秘密保持命令事證開示專利訴訟Trade secretsIntellectual property rightsProtective orderDiscoveryPatent litigation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:42
期刊論文
1.范曉玲(20070400)。智慧財產案件審理法下啟動專利侵權案件的新挑戰--以定暫時狀態處分、證據蒐集及秘密保持命令為核心。全國律師,11(4),37-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝銘洋(20061200)。智慧財產法院之設置與專利商標行政救濟制度之改進。月旦法學,139,5-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳東都(20050200)。從美國專利訴訟制度論設立我國專利法院。臺灣本土法學雜誌,67,5-17。  延伸查詢new window
4.張宇樞(20061200)。評析「智慧財產案件審理法」草案中與秘密保持命令相關的規定--兼論美國實務之運作模式。月旦法學,139,41-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Grumbles, Ernest W., III、Jordan, George W., III(2006)。An Evolving Balancing Act: Blanket Protective Orders in Patent Litigation。The Patent Lawyer,April,9-11。  new window
6.Lowenfeld, Andreas F.(1986)。Some Reflections on Transnational Discovery。The Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Market Law,8,419-419。  new window
7.Shemanski(1983)。Obtaining Evidence in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Impact of American Judicial Cooperation。International Lawyer,17,465-465。  new window
8.Gerber, David J.(1986)。Extraterritorial Discovery and the Conflict of Procedural Systems: Germany and the United States。The American Journal of Comparative Law,34,745-745。  new window
9.James, Beardsley(1986)。Proof of Fact in French Civil Procedure。The American Journal of Comparative Law,34,459-459。  new window
10.Marcus, Richard L.(1983)。Myth and Reality in Protective Order Litigation。Cornell Law Review,69(1),1-75。  new window
11.張道周(2006)。建立智慧財產權專業法院應有之公共政策辯論。臺灣本土法學雜誌,78。  延伸查詢new window
12.Allen, Ronald J.(1988)。The German Advantage in Civil Procedure: A Plea for More Details and Fewer Generalities in Comparative Scholarship。Northwestern University Law Review,82。  new window
13.Miller, Arthur R.(1991)。Confidentiality, Protective Orders, and Public Access to the Courts。Harvard Law Review,105,427-427。  new window
14.高部真規子(2007)。知的財產権訴訟今後の課題(下)。New Business Law,860。  延伸查詢new window
15.高部真規子(2006)。知的財產権訴訟における秘密保護手続の現狀と課題。ジュリスト,1317。  延伸查詢new window
16.Marcus, Richard L.(1991)。The Discovery Confidentiality Controversy。University of Illinois Law Review,1991,457-457。  new window
圖書
1.沈冠伶(2007)。民事證據法與武器平等原則。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.張靜(2007)。營業秘密法及相關智權問題。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Moore, Kimberly Pace、Michel, Paul R.、Lupo, Raphael V.(2003)。Patent Litigation and Strategy。  new window
4.賴文智、顏雅倫(2004)。營業秘密法二十講。益思科技法律事務所。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃國昌(2003)。Introducing Discovery into Civil Law。Durham, N.C.:Carolina Academic Press。  new window
6.竹下守夫(1999)。研究會新民事訴訟法。有斐閣。  延伸查詢new window
7.王甲乙、楊建華、鄭健才(200510)。民事訴訟法新論。台北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳明軒(2004)。中國民事訴訟法。臺北市:吳明軒。  延伸查詢new window
9.謝銘洋、古清華、丁中原、張凱娜(1996)。營業秘密法解讀。臺北:月旦出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.新堂幸司(2005)。新民事訴訟法。弘文堂。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃國昌(2005)。在十字路口上自我選擇、自我負責的債務人-由釋字五八八論拒絕陳述或虛偽陳述之管收合憲性。自由.責任.法-蘇俊雄教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.近藤昌昭、齊藤友嘉(2004)。司法制度改革概說2:知的財產関係二法、労働審判法。司法制度改革概說2:知的財產関係二法、労働審判法。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.許士宦(2005)。文書之開示與秘匿,證據蒐集與紛爭解決。文書之開示與秘匿,證據蒐集與紛爭解決。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Miller(1994)。8 A Wright, & Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure §2284。8 A Wright, & Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure §2284。0。  new window
15.Kinney、Lange(2007)。Intellectual Property Law for Business Lawyers。Intellectual Property Law for Business Lawyers。0。  new window
16.Battersby, Gregory J.、Grimes, Charles W.(2003)。Patent Disputes: Litigation Forms and Analysis §4.08:4-106。Patent Disputes: Litigation Forms and Analysis §4.08:4-106。0。  new window
17.Brantley, Patricia N.(1993)。Patent Law Handbook。Patent Law Handbook。0。  new window
其他
1.邱聯恭(2005)。口述民事訴訟法講義(三),0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE