本研究以嶺東科技大學與勤益科技大學97年度入學新生爲研究對象，採隨機抽樣方式，有效樣本共1370人（嶺東科技大學入學新生男生195人、女生500人；勤益科技大學入學新生男生458人、女生217人）。本研究目的是希望藉由體適能檢測以瞭解嶺東科技大學與勤益科技大學入學新生體適能狀況及其差異情形，並與大專常模比較，研究結果除能提供學生評量本身的體適能狀況，更可以作爲訂定或調整體育授課內容和教學方向之參考。本研究測驗項目有身高、體重（身體質量指數BMI）、柔軟度、瞬發力、肌力（肌耐力）與心肺耐力（800公尺、1600公尺跑走）等，測驗所得資料之統計分析結果如下： （一）兩校男、女學生的身高、體重、身體質量指數大部份在大專常模正常範圍內，除了勤益科大女生體重比常模輕及兩校男、女學生的瞬發力比常模佳之外，其餘項目：柔軟度、肌力（肌耐力）和心肺耐力等項，大部份都比大專常模差。 （二）嶺東科大與勤益科大男、女生在坐姿體前彎測驗結果比較上無明顯差異；但嶺東科大與勤益科大在立定跳遠測驗結果有顯著性差異，男生（p值＜0.05）、女生（p值＜0.01），顯示勤益科大男、女生瞬發力比嶺東科大佳；嶺東科大與勤益科大在仰臥起坐測驗結果有顯著性差異，男生（p值＜0.01）、女生（p值＜0.10），顯示勤益科大男、女生肌力（肌耐力）比嶺東科大佳；嶺東科大與勤益科大男生在心肺耐力測驗結果比較上無明顯差異；但嶺東科大與勤益科大女生在心肺耐力測驗結果有顯著性差異（p值＜0.01），顯示勤益科大女生心肺耐力比嶺東科大佳。 整體而言，除嶺東科大男生的坐姿體前彎與立定跳遠測驗結果及勤益科大男、女生的立定跳遠測驗結果較大專常模佳之外，其餘項目兩校在柔軟度、肌力（肌耐力）和心肺耐力上的測驗結果都比大專常模差，因之，未來兩校在課程規劃中應特別加強柔軟度、肌力（肌耐力）和心肺耐力上的訓練，以提昇學生體適能水準。

The study is to take the freshmen of Ling Tung University and Chin-Yi University of Technology in 2008 as subjects and the valid samples are 1370 (including 195 male and 500 female students of Ling Tung University; 458 male and 217 female students of Chin-Yi University of Technology) by random sampling. The study aims to understand the conditions and differences of these freshmen's physical fitness of the two universities and compared with the collegiate norm. What was found in this study can be used not only to offer the students for evaluating their conditions of physical fitness, but provide reference materials for setting or adjusting the contents and goals for teaching of physical education. Testing items are height, weight (BMI), flexibility, strength, muscle strength (muscle endurance) and cardiovascular endurance (800 m、1600 m-run/walk). The empirical findings are as follows: 1. The height, weight and BMI of these two universities are within normal range of the norm of colleges and universities. Except for the female students' weight of Chin-Yi University of Technology is lighter than the norm and male and female students' strength of both universities perform better than the norm, other items (including flexibility, muscle strength (strength endurance) and cardiovascular endurance) are worse than the norm of colleges and universities. 2. The difference among the students of these two universities is not significant in sit and reach test, but is significant in standing long jump test. The male (p＜0.05) and female (p＜0.01) show the students' strength in Chin-Yi University of Technology is better than in Ling Tung University. The difference of these two universities is significant in sit-up, the male (p＜0.01) and female (p＜0.10) show muscle strength (muscle endurance) of students in Chin-Yi University of Technology is better than in Ling Tung University. The difference of male students of these two universities is not significant in cardiovascular endurance, but it is significant for female students (p＜0.01). It shows the cardiovascular endurance of female students in Chin-Yi University of Technology is better than in Ling Tung University. As a whole, the male students' results of sit and reach and standing long jump in Ling Tung University and those of standing long jump of all freshmen in Chin-Yi University of Technology are better than the norm of colleges and universities, but those of flexibility, strength, muscle strength (muscle endurance) and cardiovascular endurance are worse than the norm. In the future, these two universities should particularly enhance the training of flexibility, muscle strength (muscle endurance) and cardiovascular endurance in order to increase the level of physical fitness.